International Journal of Human Capital in Urban Management
Quarterly Publication

Adoption intention of artificial intelligence enabled smart city services from citizens' perspective

https://doi.org/10.22034/IJHCUM.2024.01.03
Volume 9, Issue 1 - Serial Number 33
Winter 2024
Pages 29-46
International Journal of Human Capital in Urban Management

Document Type : ORIGINAL RESEARCH ARTICLE

Authors

S. Kuberkar 1
Sh. Singh 1
T.K. Singhal 2

1 Symbiosis Centre for Management Studies, Symbiosis International Deemed University, India

2 Department of Information Technology, FORE School of Management, India

Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Urban administrators of major cities in India are planning to deploy advanced information technologies such as artificial intelligence to deliver e-governance services. It is expected to enable citizens to acquire relevant information to their commonly asked questions without significant technological expertise. With its text, speech, and image processing capabilities similar to human beings, artificial intelligence is predicted to have both positive and negative social impact. The objective of this paper was to develop a conceptual framework consisting of enablers and barriers in adopting artificial intelligence enabled service delivery in a smart city from citizens’ perspectives. The study is novel in terms of empirically finding factors influencing adoption intention of artificial intelligence for availing citizen services in a nation like India which has a very large population and developing economy.
METHODS: The study utilized an extended unified theory of acceptance and use of technology framework and employed survey-based data collection technique. A structured survey was circulated as part of primary data collection. The responses were collected from 772 sample respondents from three upcoming smart cities in India and were further examined by deploying the structural equation modeling technique using IBM SPSS and AMOS tools.
FINDINGS: The proposed framework in this research study has social implications in terms of key factors that are critical when conceptualizing government services using artificial intelligence to avoid any harmful effects on society. The findings demonstrated six enablers and three barriers significantly affecting adoption intention (p<0.05) and explained 81 percent of the variance (R2) with the model's Goodness-of-fit index above 0.9. The quantitative results are also validated with the case studies from six smart cities across the globe for designing and deploying artificial intelligence-based services in the public sector.  
CONCLUSION: the study highlights that the smart city management must make sufficient effort to ensure that artificial intelligence service delivery in a smart city is equitable for all socioeconomic levels of city residents. The study provides several policy recommendations for governments and technology service providers when deploying artificial intelligence-based services for citizens in developing countries like India.

Graphical Abstract

Adoption intention of artificial intelligence enabled smart city services from citizens perspective

Keywords

Artificial Intelligence
Ethics
Technology Adoption
Smart City Citizen Services
Subjects

OPEN ACCESS

©2024 The author(s). This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third-party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit: 

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ 

PUBLISHER NOTE

Tehran Urban Research and Planning Center Publisher remains neutral concerning jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. 

CITATION METRICS & CAPTURES

Google Scholar | DOAJ | Scopus | EBSCO | Internet Archive |Twitter |Mendeley  

CURRENT PUBLISHER

Akman, I.; Mishra, A., (2017). Factors influencing consumer intention in social commerce adoption, Inf. Technol. People, 30(2): 356-370 (15 pages).
Almaiah, M.A.; Nasereddin, Y., (2020). Factors influencing the adoption of e-government services among Jordanian citizens. Electron. Gov. Int. J., 16(3): 236-259 (24 pages).
Artyushina, A., (2020). Is civic data governance the key to democratic smart cities? The role of the urban data trust in Sidewalk Toronto, Telemat. Inf., 55: 101456 (13 pages).
Batayneh, R.M.A.; Taleb, N.; Said, R.A.; Alshurideh, M.T.; Ghazal, T.M.; Alzoubi, H.M., (2021). IT Governance framework and smart services integration for future development of Dubai infrastructure utilizing AI and big data, its reflection on the citizens standard of living, In the International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Computer Vision, 235-247 (13 pages).
Bednarska-Olejniczak, D.; Olejniczak, J.; Svobodová, L., (2019). Towards a smart and sustainable city with the involvement of public participation—The case of Wroclaw, Sustainability, 11(2): 332 (33 pages).
Bibri, S.E.; Krogstie, J., (2018). The big data deluge for transforming the knowledge of smart sustainable cities: A data mining framework for urban analytics, In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Smart City Applications, 1-10 (10 pages).
Camero, A.; Alba, E., (2019). Smart City and information technology: A review, Cities, 93: 84-94 (11 pages).
Caragliu, A.; Del Bo, C.; Nijkamp, P., (2011). Smart cities in Europe, J. Urban Technol., 18(2): 65-82 (18 pages).
Census of India. (2011). Primary census abstract. Office of the Registrar General and Census Commissioner.
Chatterjee, S.; Kar, A.K., (2018). Regulation and governance of the Internet of Things in India, Digit. Policy Regul. Gov., 20(5): 399-412 (14 pages).
Dillman, D. (2000). Mail and internet surveys: the tailored design method. New York: Wiley.
Drobyazko, S.; Hilorme, T.; Nesterenko, S.; Shatskaya, Z., (2023). Formation of the intelligent energy system based on digital technologies in urban management, Int. J. Hum. Cap. Urban Manage., 8(1): 17-30 (16 pages).
Dwivedi, Y.K.; Hughes, L.; Ismagilova, E.; Aarts, G.; Coombs, C.; Crick, T.; Duan, Y.; Dwivedi, R.; Edwards, J.; Eirug, A.; Galanos, V., (2021). Artificial intelligence (ai): multidisciplinary perspectives on emerging challenges, opportunities, and agenda for research, practice and policy, Int. J. Inf. Manage., 57, 101994 (47 pages).
Dwivedi, Y.K.; Rana, N.P.; Jeyaraj, A.; Clement, M.; Williams, M.D., (2019). Re-examining the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT): Towards a revised theoretical model, Inf. Syst. Front., 21(3): 719-734 (16 pages).
Falco, G.; Shneiderman, B.; Badger, J.; Carrier, R.; Dahbura, A.; Danks, D.; Yeong, Z.K., (2021). Governing AI safety through independent audits. Nat. Mach. Intell., 3(7): 566-571 (16 pages).
Fahimah, N.; Salami, I.R.S.; Oginawati, K.; Yapfrine, S.J.; Supriatin, A.; Thaher, Y.N., (2023). Mapping and determining chemical of potential concerns from heavy metals in water usage in the uppers watershed. Global J. Environ. Sci. Manage., 9(4): 765-788 (24 pages).
Følstad, A.; Nordheim, C.B.; Bjørkli, C.A., (2018). What makes users trust a chatbot for customer service? an exploratory interview study, In International Conference on Internet Science, 194-208 (14 pages).
Gupta, K.P.; Singh, S.; Bhaskar, P., (2016). Citizen adoption of e-government: a literature review and conceptual framework, Electron. Gov. Int. J., 12(2): 160-185 (16 pages).
Hair, J.F.; Black, W.C.; Babin, B.J.; Anderson, R.E.; Tatham, R.L., (2006). Multivariate data analysis (Vol. 6), Pearson-Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
Henseler, J.; Ringle, C M.; Sarstedt, M., (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling, J. Acad. Mark. Sci., 43(1): 115-135 (21 pages).
Irani, Z.; Weerakkody. V.; Kamal, M.; Hindi, N.M.; Osman, I.H.; Anouze, A.L.; Al-Ayoubi, B., (2012). An analysis of methodologies utilised in e‐government research: A user satisfaction perspective, J. Enterp. Inf. Manage., 25(3): 298-313 (16 pages).
Kuberkar, S.; Singhal, T.K., (2020). Factors influencing adoption intention of ai powered chatbot for public transport services within a Smart City, Int. J. Emerg. technol., 11(3): 948-958 (11 pages).
Kuberkar, S.; Singhal, T.K., (2021). Factors Influencing the Adoption Intention of Blockchain and Internet-of-Things Technologies for Sustainable Blood Bank Management, Int. J. Healthc. Inf. Syst. Inform., 16(4): 1-21 (21 pages).
Kuberkar, S.; Singhal, T.K.; Singh, S., (2022). Fate of AI for smart city services in India: A Qualitative Study, Int. J. Electron. Gov. Res., 18(2): 1-21 (21 pages).
Kupfer, A.; Ableitner, L.; Schöb, S.; Tiefenbeck, V., (2016). Technology Adoption vs. Continuous Usage Intention: do Decision Criteria Change when Using a Technology?, In Proceedings of the 22th Americas Conference on Information Systems (AMCIS), AIS Electronic Library  (10 pages).
Lee, M.C., (2009). Factors influencing the adoption of internet banking: An integration of TAM and TPB with perceived risk and perceived benefit, Electron. Commer. Res. Appl., 8(3): 130-141 (12 pages).
Lee, S. G.; Trimi, S.; Kim, C. (2013). The impact of cultural differences on technology adoption, J. World Bus., 48(1): 20-29 (10 pages).
Lewis, M.; Sycara, K.; Walker, P., (2018). The role of trust in human-robot interaction. In foundations of trusted autonomy, Springer, Cham, 135-159 (25 pages).
Lnenicka, M.; Saxena, S., (2021). Re-defining open government data standards for smart cities websites: a case study of selected cities, Digit. Policy Regul. Gov., 23(4): 398-411 (13 pages).
Mark, R.; Anya, G., (2019). Ethics of using smart city AI and big data: The case of four large European cities, Orbit, 2(2): 1-36 (36 pages).
Marvi, L.T.; Behzadfar, M.; Shemirani, S.M., (2023). Defining the social-sustainable framework for smart cities. Int. J. Hum. Capital Urban Manage., 8(1): 95-110 (16 pages).
Minsky, M., (1961). Steps toward artificial intelligence, Proc. IRE, 49(1): 8-30 (23 pages).
Nakamoto, S., (2008). Bitcoin: A peer-to-peer electronic cash system. Dec. Bus. Rev., 21260 (9 pages).
Nam, T.; Pardo, T.A., (2011). Conceptualizing smart city with dimensions of technology, people, and institutions, In Proceedings of the 12th annual international digital government research conference: digital government innovation in challenging times, 282-291 (10 pages).
Nevala, K., (2017). The machines learning primer. Cary, NC: SAS Institute.
Ng, A., (2018). AI is the new electricity. OReilly Media.
NITI Aayog., (2018). National Strategy for Artificial Intelligence.
Nunnally, J.C., (1994). Psychometric theory 3E, Tata McGraw-hill education.
Ølnes, S.; Jansen, A., (2017). Blockchain technology as s support infrastructure in e-government, In International conference on electronic government, Springer, Cham, 215-227 (13 pages).
Pillai, R.; Sivathanu, B., (2020). Adoption of AI-based chatbots for hospitality and tourism, Int. J. Contemp. Hosp. Manag., 32(10): 3199-3226 (28 pages).
Praharaj, S.; Han, J.H.; Hawken, S., (2018). Urban innovation through policy integration: Critical perspectives from 100 smart cities mission in India, City, Cult. Soc., 12: 35-43 (9 pages).
Rana, N.P.; Dwivedi, Y.K.; Lal, B., Williams, M.D.; Clement, M., (2017). Citizens adoption of an electronic government system: towards a unified view, Inf. Syst. Front., 19(3): 549-568 (20 pages).
Samimi, M., (2024). Efficient biosorption of cadmium by Eucalyptus globulus fruit biomass using process parameters optimization. Global J. Environ. Sci. Manage., 10(1): 27-38 (12 pages).
Samimi, M.; Mohammadzadeh, E.; Mohammadzadeh, A., (2023). Rate enhancement of plant growth using Ormus solution: optimization of operating factors by response surface methodology. Int. J. Phytoremediation, 25(12), 1636-1642 (7 pages).
Siau, K.; Wang, W., (2020). Artificial intelligence (AI) ethics: ethics of AI and ethical AI, J. Database Manag., 31(2): 74-87 (14 pages).
Singh, N.; Zhao, H.; Hu, X., (2005). Analyzing the cultural content of websites: A cross-national comparison of China, India, Japan, and US. Int. Marke. Rev., 22(2): 129-146 (18 pages).
Sjoberg, G., (1955). The preindustrial city, Am. J. Sociol., 60(5): 438-445 (8 pages).
Tajpour, M.; Razavi, S. M., (2023). The effect of team performance on the internationalization of Digital Startups: The mediating role of entrepreneurship, Int. J. Hum. Cap. Urban Manage., 8(1): 17-30 (14 pages).
World Bank., (2022). Urban population (% of total population) - India.
United Nations. (2020). UN E-Government Survey.
Venkatesh, V.; Morris, M.G.; Davis, F.D.; Davis, G.B., (2003). User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View, MIS. Q., 27: 425-478 (54 pages).
Yang, L.; Elisa, N.; Eliot, N., (2019). Privacy and security aspects of E-government in smart cities, In Smart cities cybersecurity and privacy, Elsevier, 89-102 (14 pages).
Yang, Y.; Liu, Y.; Lv, X.; Ai, J.; Li, Y., (2022). Anthropomorphism and customers willingness to use artificial intelligence service agents, J. Hosp. Mark. Manage., 31(1): 1-23 (23 pages).
Yeh, H., (2017). The effects of successful ICT-based smart city services: From citizens perspectives, Gov. Inf. Q., 34(3): 556-565 (10 pages).
Yigitcanlar, T.; Kankanamge, N.; Vella, K., (2021). How are smart city concepts and technologies perceived and utilized? A systematic geo-Twitter analysis of smart cities in Australia, J. Urban Technol., 28(1-2): 135-154 (20 pages).
Zajko, M., (2021). Conservative AI and social inequality: conceptualizing alternatives to bias through social theory, AI Soc., 36(3): 1047-1056 (10 pages).
Zeng, C.; Deng, X.; Dong, J.; Hu, P., (2016). Urbanization and sustainability: comparison of the processes in BIC countries. Sustainability, 8(4): 400 (18 pages).
  • Receive Date 11 July 2023
  • Revise Date 27 September 2023
  • Accept Date 16 October 2023

Home

Authorship

Submit Manuscript

Indexing and Abstracting

Editorial Board

Unrestricted Reuse in Compliance with BOAI

Open Access Policy

Self-Archiving Policy

Privacy Statement

Publisher Business Model

Publisher and Sponsor

Contact Us