Defining the social-sustainable framework for smart cities

Tavanaei Marvi, L.; Behzadfar, M.; Mofidi Shemirani, S.M.

doi:10.22034/IJHCUM.2023.01.08

Document Type : ORIGINAL RESEARCH ARTICLE

Authors

Department of Urban Design, School of Architecture and Environmental Design, Iran University of Science and Technology ,Tehran, Iran

https://doi.org/10.22034/IJHCUM.2023.01.08

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Smart cities have been criticized for being too technologically driven and reinforcing entrepreneurial thinking rather than focusing on citizens and social sustainability. This paper aims to “define the implementing principles for Smart Cities in Tehran as a social construct”. In this regard, this study tries to develop smart city indicators and suggest a set of implementing principles for smart cities, citizens, and civic organizations in Tehran. Furthermore, this paper illustrates how in-progress smart city projects are meeting the citizens' needs in 22 districts of Tehran Municipality.
METHODS: The present study has used a qualitative and quantitative methodology based on theoretical frameworks. In this paper, Maslow's hierarchy of needs acts as a meta-method for defining the principles of social sustainability to implement smart city projects. First, smart sustainable cities and associated indicators were evaluated based on Maslow’s hierarchy of needs. Second, a case study approach was utilized to assess Tehran’s smart city projects. Finally, the Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, Threats and Quantitative Strategic Planning Matrix techniques were used to define strategies based on internal and external environmental factors and relation to social sustainability.
FINDINGS: The results indicated that promoting innovation centers and living labs to create a vibrant, active, and healthy public realm was the most effective strategy for smart city development in Tehran (Weaknesses-Opportunities8=.1.323). Two important additional strategies were “involve stakeholders and focus on people and consider urban residents not only as recipients or users of smart cities but also as designers of smart cities” (Strengths-Opportunities3=1.075) and “promote community involvement in council decision-making by developing interactive platforms” (Strengths-Opportunities8=0.884).
CONCLUSION: This paper contributes knowledge on how cities such as Tehran can achieve and implement social sustainability using a smart city approach. Plans and projects for a smart city in Tehran were deemed neither realistic nor sufficiently strategic, and they are assumed to satisfy neither policymakers nor citizens. Social sustainability-based principles and strategies are necessary to incorporate citizen perspectives into Tehran’s smart city plan and policies. The present study adds several significant insights to the existing frameworks for implementing smart city frameworks in Tehran.

Keywords

Main Subjects

Information and communications technology in Urban Management

OPEN ACCESS

©2023 The author(s). This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third-party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit:

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

PUBLISHER NOTE

IJHCUM Publisher remains neutral concerning jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

CITATION METRICS & CAPTURES

CURRENT PUBLISHER

Tehran Municipality: Tehran Urban Research and Planning Center

References

Agency, (2012). Indicators for Sustainability: How Cities are Monitoring and Evaluating Their Success. Canada: p. 84 (1 page).

Albino, V.; Berardi, U.; Dangelico, R. M., (2015). Smart cities: Definitions, dimensions, performance, and initiatives. J. Urb. Tech., 22(1): 3–21 (18 pages).

Babbie, E., (2004). The logic of sampling, The basics of social research, Cengage Learning.

Badi, I. ; Muhammad, L.J. ; Abubakr, M. ; Bakir, M., (2022). Measuring Sustainability Performance Indicators Using FUCOM-MARCOS Methods. Oper. Res. Eng. Sci., 5(2): 99-116 (18 pages).

Ben Yahia, N.; Eljaoued, W.; Bellamine Ben Saoud, N.; Colomo-Palacios, R., (2019). Towards sustainable collaborative networks for smart cities co-governance. Int. J. of Inf. Manage., 56: 1-16 (16 pages).

Bouzguenda, I.; Alalouch, C.; Fava, N., (2019). Towards smart sustainable cities: A review of the role digital citizen participation could play in advancing social sustainability. S. C. S., 50(101627): 1-15 (15 pages).

Branny, A.; Møller, M. S.; Korpilo, S.; McPhearson, T.; Gulsrud, N.; Olafsson, A. S.; Andersson, E., (2022). Smarter greener cities through a social-ecological-technological systems approach. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain., 55: 1-11 (11 pages).

Caird, S., (2018). City approaches to smart city evaluation and reporting: case studies in the United Kingdom. Urban Res. Pract., 11(2): 159-179 (20pages).

Caird, S. P.; Hallett, S. H., (2019). Towards evaluation design for smart city development. J. Urban Des., 24(2): 188-209(21 pages).

European Commission DG. (2012). Science for environment policy: European Commission DG environment news alert service.

Freestone, R.; Favaro, P., (2022). The social sustainability of smart cities: a conceptual framework. City Cult. Soc., 29(1): 1-14 (14 pages).

Gonzalez-Garcia, S.; Manteiga, R.; Moreira, M. T.; Feijoo, G., (2018). Assessing the sustainability of Spanish cities considering environmental and socioeconomic indicators. J. of Clea. Prod., 178: 599–610 (11 pages).

Harrison, C.; Eckman, B.; Hamilton, R.; Hartswick, P.; Kalagnanam, J.; Paraszczak, J.; Williams, P., (2010). Foundations for smarter cities. IBM J. of Res. and Dev., 54(4): 1-16 (15 pages).

Hosseini, E.; Tajpour, M.; Lashkarbooluki, M., (2020). The impact of entrepreneurial skills on manager’s job performance, Int. J. Hum. Capital Urban Manage., 5(4): 361-372 (11 pages).

Höjer, M.; Wangel, J., (2014). Smart sustainable cities: definition and challenges. Adv. in Intel. Sys. and Comp., 310: 333–349 (16 pages).

Huovila, A.; Bosch, P.; Airaksinen, M., (2019). Comparative analysis of standardized indicators for smart sustainable cities: what indicators and standards to use and when?. Cities, 89: 141–153 (12 pages).

Jiang, H.; Geertman, S.; Witte, P., (2022). Smart urban governance: an alternative to technocratic “smartness”. GeoJournal, 87(3): 1639–1655 (16 pages).

Joss, S.; Cook, M.; Dayot, Y., (2017). Smart cities: Towards a new citizenship regime? A discourse analysis of the British smart city standard. J. Urban Technol., 24(4): 29-49(20 pages).

Komeily, A.; Srinivasan, R. S., (2017). Sustainability in smart cities: balancing social, economic, environmental, and institutional aspects of urban life. smart cities: foundations, principles, and applications. 503–534 (31 pages).

Lang, J. T., (1994). Urban design: the American experience. John Wiley & Sons.

Marsal-Llacuna, M. L., (2016). City indicators on social sustainability as standardization technologies for smarter (citizen-centered) governance of cities. Soc. Ind. Res., 128(3): 1193–1216 (23 pages).

Martin, C. J.; Evans, J.; Karvonen, A., (2018). Smart and sustainable? five tensions in the visions and practices of the smart-sustainable city in Europe and North America. Tec. Fore. and Soc. Chan., 133: 269–278 (9 pages).

Maslow, A. H., (1967). A Theory of meta motivation: the biological rooting of the value-life. J. of Hum. Psych., 7(2): 93–127 (34 pages).

Maslow, A. H, (1954). The instinctoid nature of basic needs. J. of Pers., 22(3): 326–347 (21 pages).

Marzukhi, M. A.; Omar, D.; Leh, O. L. H.; Hamir, M. S.; Barghchi, M. , (2011). Malaysian urban indicators network: a sustainable development initiative in Malaysia. Eur. J. of Soc. Sci., 25(1): 77-83 (6 pages).

Mohebbi, N.; Nouri, J.; Khorasani, N.; Riazi, B. , (2022). Environmental management for human communities around wetlands adjacent urban region by ecological risk approach. Int. J. Hum. Capital Urban Manage., 7(1): 1-16 (16 pages).

Monfaredzadeh, T.; Krueger, R., (2015). Investigating social factors of sustainability in a smart city. Proc. Eng., 118: 1112–1118 (6 pages).

Mora, L.; Deakin, M., (2019). The social shaping of smart cities, untangling smart cities. Elsevier, 215–234 (19 pages).

Moser, C. A.; Kalton, G., (2017). Survey methods in social investigation. Routledge.

Phillis, Y. A.; Kouikoglou, V. S.; Verdugo, C., (2017). Urban sustainability assessment and ranking of cities. Comp., Env. and Urb. Sys., 64: 254–265 (11 pages).

Sharifi, A., (2021). Urban sustainability assessment: an overview and bibliometric analysis. Ecol. Indic, 121: 1-18 (18 pages).

Shmelev, S. E.; Shmeleva, I. A., (2019). Multidimensional sustainability benchmarking for smart megacities. Cities, 92: 134–163 (29 pages).

Smart Tehran Center., (2018). The Local model of Tehran smart city.

Song, H.; Srinivasan, R. S.; Sookoor, T.; Jeschke, S., (2017). Smart Cities: foundations, principles, and applications. John Wiley & Sons.

Statistical Centre of Iran, (2016). National population and housing census Tehran: Statistical Center of Iran.

Wang, J. ; Liu, C. ; Zhou, L. ; Xu, J. ; Wang, J. ; Sang, Z., (2022). Progress of standardization of urban infrastructure in smart city. standards, 2(3): 417-429 (12 pages).

Yigitcanlar, T.; Kamruzzaman, M.; Foth, M.; Sabatini-Marques, J.; da Costa, E.; Ioppolo, G. , (2019). Can cities become smart without being sustainable? A systematic review of the literature. Sus. Cit. and Soc., 45: 348–365 (17 pages).

Zhang, Y.; Liu, F.; Gu, Z.; Chen, Z.; Shi, Y.; Li, A., (2019). Research on smart city evaluation based on hierarchy of needs. Proc. Comp. Sci., 162: 467–474 (7 pages).

LETTERS TO EDITOR

International Journal of Human Capital in Urban Management (IJHCUM) welcomes letters to the editor for the post-publication discussions and corrections which allows debate post publication on its site, through the Letters to Editor. Letters pertaining to manuscript published in IJHCUM should be sent to the editorial office of IJHCUM within three months of either online publication or before printed publication, except for critiques of original research. Following points are to be considering before sending the letters (comments) to the editor.

[1] Letters that include statements of statistics, facts, research, or theories should include appropriate references, although more than three are discouraged.

[2] Letters that are personal attacks on an author rather than thoughtful criticism of the author’s ideas will not be considered for publication.

[3] Letters can be no more than 300 words in length.

[4] Letter writers should include a statement at the beginning of the letter stating that it is being submitted either for publication or not.

[5] Anonymous letters will not be considered.

[6] Letter writers must include their city and state of residence or work.

[7] Letters will be edited for clarity and length.

Name *

Email Address *

Affiliation *

Comments *

Security Code *

International Journal of Human Capital in Urban Management

Defining the social-sustainable framework for smart cities

References

References

Send comment about this article

Volume 8, Issue 1 - Serial Number 29
January 2023
Pages 95-110

Defining the social-sustainable framework for smart cities

References

References

Send comment about this article

Volume 8, Issue 1 - Serial Number 29January 2023Pages 95-110

Volume 8, Issue 1 - Serial Number 29
January 2023
Pages 95-110