International Journal of Human Capital in Urban Management
Quarterly Publication

On the master plan conformance with urban reality: A comparative assessment

Document Type : ORIGINAL RESEARCH ARTICLE

Authors

M. Jahanbani 1
E. Lashkari 2

1 Faculty of Arts, Department of Geography, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada

2 Department of Architecture and Urban Engineering, Faculty of Civil, Architecture, and Urban Engineering, Sadjad University, Mashhad, Iran

https://doi.org/10.22034/IJHCUM.2025.01.02
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The gap between urban planning and its implementation in cities has led to the evaluation of urban plans which heightens the efficiency of plans. This research evaluates the dissimilarities between the city’s reality and planned prospects.
METHODS: To assess that, the Delphi technique was utilized to determine the criteria then Geographic Information System and quantitative models namely Mean Center, Standard Deviational Ellipse, and Planning Implementation Rate were employed.
FINDINGS: The outcomes reveal that Mashhad’s direction of urban development corresponds to the master plan. The second estimated alternative for the population (with 83.52%) has a high level of conformity. On the subject of land use, conforming and non-conforming uses account for 47% and 23.80% respectively. A preponderance of non-conforming uses is in the south-to-east, north, and northwest parts of the city, and zone 7 accommodates the highest area of non-conforming uses among other zones. The implementation rate is 94.7%, showing that the current urban forms were implemented following the master plan to a large extent. However, the construction outside the city’s limit is not under regulation. Three areas with high density located in the west, northwest, and east (Bahonar town) have the highest level of non-conformity.
CONCLUSION: The master plan could not achieve its street network goal due to an approximately 58% mismatch with the existing network. As a result, the conflicts in spatial findings could have been shaped by the implementation or inattention to planning regulations.

Graphical Abstract

On the master plan conformance with urban reality: A comparative assessment

Keywords

Master plan evaluation
Conformance-based approach
Non-conformance
Planning implementation rate

OPEN ACCESS

©2024 The author(s). This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third-party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit: 

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ 

PUBLISHER NOTE
Tehran Urban Research & Planning Centre (TURPC) takes a neutral position about claims on disputed territories, place names, international boundaries, jurisdiction in published maps, and institutional affiliations. TURPC is committed to retracting a paper after its publication if it becomes apparent that there are serious problems in its content, in terms of research and publication ethics (https://www.ijhcum.net/journal/process?ethics).

CITATION METRICS & CAPTURES

Google Scholar | DOAJ | Scopus | EBSCO | Internet Archive |Twitter |Mendeley  

CURRENT PUBLISHER

 Tehran Urban Research and Planning Center: Tehran Municipality

Alexander, E.R.; Faludi, A., (1989). Planning and plan implementation: notes on evaluation criteria. Environ. Plann. B: Plann. Des., 16(2): 127–140 (14 pages).
Alterman, R., (1979). Whatever happened to our land use plan? A method for analyzing transformations in planned land uses. Socio- Econ Plan Sci., 13(5): 275–283 (9 pages).
Alterman, R.; Hill, M., (1978). Implementation of Urban Land Use Plans. J. Am. Plann. Assoc., 44(3): 274–285 (12 pages).
Asgari, A., (2011). Spatial statistics analysis with ArcGIS. Tehran: Information Technology Organization and Communication of Tehran Municipality. (127 pages). (In Persian)
Berke, P.; Backhurst, M.; Day, M.; Ericksen, N.; Laurian, L..; Crawford, J.; Dixon, J., (2006). What makes plan implementation successful? An evaluation of local plans and implementation practices in New Zealand. Environ. Plann. B: Plann. Des., 33(4): 581–600 (20 pages).
Calkins, H.W., (1979). The planning monitor: an accountability theory of plan evaluation. Environ. Plann. A: Econ. Space, 11(7): 745–758 (14 pages).
Cowan, R., (2002). Urban Design Guidance: Urban Design Frameworks, Development Briefs and Master Plans. First. Thomas Telford Publishing. (68 pages)
Cowan, R., (2005) The dictionary of urbanism. First. Streetwise press. (468 pages)
Dalkey, N.; Helmer, O., (1963). An experimental application of the Delphi method to the use of experts. Manage. Sci., 9(3): 458–467 (10 pages).
Deputy of human capital planning and development of Mashhad municipality, (2021). Statistical Report of Mashhad City. Mashhad. (In Persian)
Farnahad Consulting Engineers, (2011). Development and construction plan of Mashhad metropolis (Master Plan). Mashhad. (In Persian)
Ghodrati, M., (2002). Evaluation of Shirvan’s master plan with emphasis on its spatial-physical aspects. Tarbiat Moalem University. (In Persian)
Jahanbani, M.; Lashkari, E., (2022). Investigation of spatial-physical development model based on spatial analysis, GIS and Holdern entropy model. Int. J. Hum. Capital Urban Manage., 7(4): 545–560 (16 pages).
Laurian, L.; Day, M.; Berke, P.; Ericksen, N.; Backhurst, M.; Crawford, J.; Dixon, J., (2004). Evaluating plan implementation: A conformance-based methodology. J. Am. Plann. Assoc., 70(4): 471–480 (10 pages).
Li, J.; Li, G.; Li, J.; Liu, A., (2022). Integrating conformance and performance for the evaluation of urban planning implementation from a goal-oriented perspective. Environ. Plann. B: Urban Anal. City Sci., 49(2): 737–753 (17 pages).
Loh, C.G., (2011). Assessing and interpreting non-conformance in land-use planning implementation. Plann. Pract. Res., 26(3): 271–287 (17 pages).
Long, Y.; Gu, Y.; Han, H., (2012). Spatiotemporal heterogeneity of urban planning implementation effectiveness: Evidence from five urban master plans of Beijing. Landscape Urban Plann., 108(2–4): 103–111 (9 pages).
Mabaso, A.; Shekede, M. D.; Chirisa, I.; Zanamwe, L.; Gwitira, I.; Bandauko, E., (2015). Urban physical development and master planning in Zimbabwe: an assessment of conformance in the City of Mutare. J. Stud. Humanit. Social Sci., 4(1): 72–88 (17 pages).
Mashhoodi, S., (1944). Fluid Urban Plans. Second. Process and urban planning company.(250 pages). (In Persian)
Mehdizadeh, J.; Sarafzadeh, H,; Amiri, M.D.; Jahanshahi, M.H.; Motlagh, M.T.; Pirzade Nohoochi, M.H., (2015). Strategic planning of urban development. Fourth. Arman Shahr. (556 pages). (In Persian)
Menzori, I.D.; Sousa, I.C.N. de; Gonçalves, L.M., (2021). Urban growth management and territorial governance approaches: A master plans conformance analysis. Land Use Policy, 105: 105436.
Moradi Masihi, V.; Khalaj, M., (2010). Urban planning transformations in the world and Iran. First. The Islamic Azad University.(236 pages). (In Persian)
Oliveira, V.; Pinho, P., (2010). Evaluation in urban planning: Advances and prospects. J. Plann. Lit., 24(4): 343–361 (19 pages).
Pimpler, E., (2017). Spatial Analytics with ArcGIS. First. Packt Publishing. (290 pages)
Qian, Z., (2013). Master plan, plan adjustment and urban development reality under China’s market transition: A case study of Nanjing. Cities, 30(1): 77–88 (12 pages).
Qiao, X.J.; Kristoffersson, A.; Randrup, T.B., (2018). Challenges to implementing urban sustainable stormwater management from a governance perspective: A literature review. J. Cleaner Prod., 196: 943–952 (10 pages).
Rasoolimanesh, S.M.; Jaafar, M.; Badarulzaman, N., (2013). Urban planning and management system in Iran: A review and assessment. Middle East J. of Scientific Res., 18(2): 220–229 (10 pages).
Ryan, B.D; Gao, S., (2019). Plan Implementation Challenges in a Shrinking City: A Conformance Evaluation of Youngstown’ s (OH) Comprehensive Plan with a Subsequent Zoning Code. J. Am. Plann. Assoc., 85(4):  424–444 (23 pages).
Shen, X.; Wang, X.; Zhang, Z.; Fei, L., (2021). Does non-conforming urban development mean the failure of zoning? A framework for conformance-based evaluation. Environ. Plann. B: Urban Anal. City Sci., 48(5): 1279–1295 (17 pages).
Talen, E., (1996). Do plans get implemented? A review of evaluation in planning. J. Plann. Lit., 10(3): 248–259 (12 pages).
Vahidi Borji, G.; Nourian, F; Azizi, M.M., (2016). Identifying the obstacles to the implementation of proposed land uses in Iran’s Urban Development plans using Grounded Theory. Honar-ha-ye-ziba Memari-Va-Shahrsazi, 22(1): 5-14 (10 pages). (In Persian)
Varesi, H.; Ghanbari, M.; Poorghayoomi, H., (2013). Evaluation of performance of master plan of Binalood new town (Population, Housing, Employment). Geogr. Environ. Plann., 23(4): 139-150 (12 pages). (In Persian)
 

LETTERS TO EDITOR

International Journal of Human Capital in Urban Management (IJHCUM) welcomes letters to the editor for the post-publication discussions and corrections which allows debate post publication on its site, through the Letters to Editor. Letters pertaining to manuscript published in IJHCUM should be sent to the editorial office of IJHCUM within three months of either online publication or before printed publication, except for critiques of original research. Following points are to be considering before sending the letters (comments) to the editor.


[1] Letters that include statements of statistics, facts, research, or theories should include appropriate references, although more than three are discouraged.

[2] Letters that are personal attacks on an author rather than thoughtful criticism of the author’s ideas will not be considered for publication.

[3] Letters can be no more than 300 words in length.

[4] Letter writers should include a statement at the beginning of the letter stating that it is being submitted either for publication or not.

[5] Anonymous letters will not be considered.

[6] Letter writers must include their city and state of residence or work.

[7] Letters will be edited for clarity and length.

Send comment about this article
Enter Name.
Enter a valid email address.
Enter a vaid affiliation.
Enter comments (At leaset 10 words)
CAPTCHA Image
Enter Security Code Correctly.

  • Receive Date 10 June 2024
  • Revise Date 03 August 2024
  • Accept Date 07 September 2024

Home

Authorship

Submit Manuscript

Indexing and Abstracting

Editorial Board

Unrestricted Reuse in Compliance with BOAI

Open Access Policy

Self-Archiving Policy

Privacy Statement

Publisher Business Model

Publisher and Sponsor

Contact Us