International Journal of Human Capital in Urban Management
Quarterly Publication

Sustainable development of united territorial communities during the conflict: turning challenges into opportunities

https://doi.org/10.22034/IJHCUM.2024.04.06
Volume 9, Issue 4 - Serial Number 36
Autumn 2024
Pages 637-652
International Journal of Human Capital in Urban Management

Document Type : ORIGINAL RESEARCH ARTICLE

Authors

V. Shcherbak 1
M. Lyshenko 2
S. Tereshchenko 1
V. Yefanov 1
K. Vzhytynska 3
V. Yatsenko 4
A. Pietukhov 1

1 Department of Economics and Entrepreneurship, Sumy National Agrarian University, Sumy, 40000, Ukraine

2 2Department of Marketing and Logistics, Faculty of Economics and Management, Sumy National Agrarian University, Sumy, 40000, Ukraine

3 3Department of Trade Enterprise and Logistics, State University of Trade and Economics, Kyiv National University of Trade and Economics, Kyiv, 02156, Ukraine

4 Department of History and Socio-Economic Disciplines, Faculty of Social and Pedagogical Sciences and Foreign Philology, Municipal establishment "Kharkiv Humanitarian-Pedagogical Academy" of the Kharkiv regional council, Kharkiv, 61000, Ukraine

Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: In the context of global challenges and local conflicts, the sustainable development of united territorial communities took on special importance. Amid military conflict, united territorial communities encountered numerous economic, social, and environmental problems. This research builds on resilience and sustainable development theories and proposes that with appropriate support, united territorial communities can evolve into hubs of innovation and entrepreneurship even under conditions of conflict. The study necessitated the creation of strategies and programs for sustainable development and adaptation to new conditions, positing that united territorial communities, with proper development and support, could harness these challenges to foster significant entrepreneurial and innovative activities. The study’s objective was to analyze the potential of united territorial communities for innovation and sustainable development in conflict conditions and to develop recommendations for supporting entrepreneurship and infrastructure development.
METHODS: To achieve the objective, a variety of methods were utilized, including multi-regression, multifactor, correlational, and comparative analysis. All analyses were carried out using STATISTICA software (version 13).
FINDINGS: The research results confirmed the hypotheses, indicating the significant potential of united territorial communities for initiating innovative projects and developing entrepreneurial initiatives. Specifically, it was discovered that the level of institutional capability and sustainable development could increase by 43.7% with the integration of effective support programs. Crucial elements impacting sustainability were pinpointed, with investments in environmental projects showing an 85% variance, socio-demographic stability exhibiting a 92.8% variance, and the development and implementation of programs for small and medium-sized business development reflecting a 92.9% variance. This demonstrated the potential for enhancing the budget efficiency of territorial communities by up to 56.4%, representing a substantial incentive for recovery and progress in the post-conflict period.
CONCLUSION: Recommendations included developing targeted programs to support innovations in the agricultural sector, tourism, and eco-initiatives, which could catalyze attracting investments and improve the quality of life in territorial communities. The importance of integrating modern technologies, supporting local entrepreneurship, and developing infrastructure were key elements for the sustainable development of united territorial communities in conflict conditions. The developed recommendations could facilitate the formation of effective development strategies for territorial communities.

Graphical Abstract

Sustainable development of united territorial communities during the conflict: turning challenges into opportunities

Keywords

Conflict
Entrepreneurship
Infrastructure
Innovation
Sustainable development
United territorial communities
Subjects

OPEN ACCESS

©2024 The author(s). This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third-party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit: 

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ 

PUBLISHER NOTE
Tehran Urban Research & Planning Centre (TURPC) takes a neutral position about claims on disputed territories, place names, international boundaries, jurisdiction in published maps, and institutional affiliations. TURPC is committed to retracting a paper after its publication if it becomes apparent that there are serious problems in its content, in terms of research and publication ethics (https://www.ijhcum.net/journal/process?ethics).

CITATION METRICS & CAPTURES

Google Scholar | DOAJ | Scopus | EBSCO | Internet Archive |Twitter |Mendeley  

CURRENT PUBLISHER

 Tehran Urban Research and Planning Center: Tehran Municipality

Acunzo, M.; Vertiz, V., (2014). Promoting communication in agricultural and rural development: FAO’s priorities and initiatives in 2014. Glocal Times., 20: 1-8 (8 pages).
Akimov, O., (2022). Post-war economy of Ukraine: innovation and investment development project. Econ. Aff., 67(05): 943-959 (17 pages).
Beckmann, K.B.; Reimer, L., (2014). Dynamics of military conflict: an economics perspective. Rev. Econ., 65: 193-215 (23 pages).
Beyene, F.; Senapathy, M.; Bojago, E.; Tadiwos, T., (2023). Rural household resilience to food insecurity and its determinants: Damot Pulasa district, Southern Ethiopia. J. Agric. Food Res., 11(100500): 1-18 (18 pages).
Bruton, G.; Sutter, C.; Lenz, A.-K., (2021). Economic inequality – is entrepreneurship the cause or the solution? A review and research agenda for emerging economies. J. Bus. Venturing., 36(3): 106095 (51 pages).
Denton, P., (2017). Sustainability, ethics and war. Can. Mil. J., 17(3): 61-72 (12 pages).
Emtage, N.; Herbohn, J., (2012). Assessing rural landholders’ diversity in the Wet Tropics region of Queensland, Australia in relation to natural resource management programs: a market segmentation approach. Agric. Syst., 110: 107-118 (12 pages).
Folke, C.; Carpenter, S.R.; Walker, B.; Scheffer, M.; Chapin, T.; Rockstrom, J., (2010). Resilience thinking: integrating resilience, adaptability and transformability. Ecol. Soc., 15(4): 20-28 (9 pages).
Gignoux, J.; Menéndez, M., (2016). Benefit in the wake of disaster: long-run effects of earthquakes on welfare in rural Indonesia. J. Dev. Econ., 118: 26-44 (19 pages).
Gutierrez-Velez, V.H.; Gilbert, M.R.; Kinsey, D.; Behm, J.E., (2022). Beyond the ‘urban’ and the ‘rural’: conceptualizing a new generation of infrastructure systems to enable rural–urban sustainability. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustainability., 56: 101177 (33 pages).
Hansen, W.D., (2014). Generalizable principles for ecosystem stewardship-based management of social-ecological systems: lessons learned from Alaska. Ecol. Soc., 19(4): 13 (13 pages).
Harrington, L.M.B., (2016). Sustainability theory and conceptual considerations: a review of key ideas for sustainability, and the rural context. Pap. Appl. Geogr., 2(4): 365-382 (18 pages).
Higgins, V.; Lockie, S., (2002). Re-discovering the social: neo-liberalism and hybrid practices of governing in rural natural resource management. J. Rural Stud., 18(4): 419-428 (10 pages).
Hussain, S.; Ahonen, V.; Karasu, T.; Leviäkangas, P., (2023). Sustainability of smart rural mobility and tourism: A key performance indicators-based approach. Technol. Soc., 74: 102287 (18 pages).
Ilina, M.; Shpyliova, Y. (2021). Comprehensive spatial differentiation of territorial communities: case of Zhytomyr region. Visnyk Karazin Kharkiv Natl. Univ., Ser. Geol. Geogr. Ecol. Quot., 55: 174-186 (13 pages).
Jahanshahi, A.A.; Gholami, H.; Rivas, M.I., (2020). Sustainable development challenges in a war‐torn country: Perceived danger and psychological well‐being. J. Public Aff., 20(3): e2077 (9 pages).
Kajus, H.A.G.E.L.S.T.A.M.; Marcel, M.A.G.N.U.S.; Gereon, S.K., (2022). Economic repercussions of Russia’s war on Ukraine–Weekly Digest 19 August 2022 (20 pages).
Kumar, R., (2018). War and peace: Is our world serious about achieving Sustainable Development Goals by 2030? J. Fam. Med. Primary Care., 7(6): 1153-1156 (4 pages).
Leder, S., (2022). Beyond the feminization of agriculture: rural out-migration, shifting gender relations and emerging spaces in natural resource management. J. Rural Stud., 91: 157-169 (13 pages).
Lee, S.S., (2023). Entrepreneurship for all? The rise of a global “entrepreneurship for development” agenda, 1950–2021. World Dev., 166: 106226 (13 pages).
Loevinsohn, M.; Berdegué, J.; Guijt, I., (2002). Deepening the basis of rural resource management: learning processes and decision support. Agric. Syst., 73(1): 3-22 (20 pages). 
Mwesiumo, D.; Halfdanarson, J.; Shlopak, M., (2022). Navigating the early stages of a large sustainability-oriented rural tourism development project: Lessons from Træna, Norway. Tourism Manage., 89: 104456 (11 pages).
Pereira, P.; Zhao, W.; Symochko, L.; Inacio, M.; Bogunovic, I.; Barcelo, D., (2022). The Russian‐Ukrainian armed conflict will push back the sustainable development goals. Geogr. Sustainability., 3(3): 277-287 (11 pages).
Petrescu-Mag, R.M.; Petrescu, D.C.; Azadi, H.; Petrescu-Mag, I.V., (2018). Agricultural land use conflict management – vulnerabilities, law restrictions and negotiation frames. A wake-up call. Land Use Policy., 76: 600-610 (11 pages).
Prohorovs, A., (2022). Russia’s war in Ukraine: consequences for European countries’ businesses and economies. J. Risk Financ. Manage., 15(7): 1-15 (15 pages).
Raja, S.S.; Raju, V.; Husnain, M.; Sarfraz, S.; Malik, F.; Raja., S.S., (2022). Framework for sustainable rural development through entrepreneurial initiatives in emerging economies. Sustainability, 14(19): 11972-12003 (32 pages).
Rodríguez-Darias, A.J.; Díaz-Rodríguez, P., (2023). Some considerations on the implications of protected areas for sustainable development. Sustainability, 15(3): 1-15 (15 pages).
Roldan, C.S.; Giraldo, G.A.M.; Santana, E.L., (2023). Sustainable development in rural territories within the last decade: a review of the state of the art. Heliyon., 9(7): e17555 (23 pages).
Shan, L.; Yu, A.T.W.; Wu, Y., (2017). Strategies for risk management in urban–rural conflict: two case studies of land acquisition in urbanising China. Habitat Int., 59: 90-100 (11 pages).
Shcherbak, V.; Bryzhan, I.; Chevhanova, V.; Svistun, L.; Hryhoryeva, О., (2020). Impact of forced migration on the sustainable development of rural territories. Global J. Environ. Sci. Manage., 6(4): 481-496 (16 pages).
Shcherbak, V.; Danko, Y.; Tereshchenko, S.; Nifatova, O.; Dehtiar, N.; Stepanova, O.; Yatsenko, V., (2024). Circular economy and inclusion as effective tools to prevent ecological threats in rural areas during military operations. Global J. Environ. Sci. Manage., 10(3): 1-18 (18 pages).
Shcherbak, V.; Ganushchak-Yefimenko, L.; Nifatova, O.; Fastovets, N.; Plysenko, G.; Lutay, L.; Tkachuk, V.; Ptashchenko, O., (2020). Use of key indicators to monitor sustainable development of rural areas. Global J. Environ. Sci. Manage., 6(2), 175-190 (16 pages).
Shcherbak, V.; Gryshchenko, I.; Ganushchak-Yefimenko, L.; Nifatova, O.; Tkachuk, V.; Kostiuk, T.; Hotra, V., (2021). Using a sharing-platform to prevent a new outbreak of COVID-19 pandemic in rural areas. Global J. Environ. Sci. Manage., 7(2): 155-170 (16 pages).
Shkoda, M.; Marova, S.; Gorobets, N.; Tokuieva, N.; Zvonovskyi, R.; Babaiev, V.; Tereshchenko, S., (2023). Technological management of cluster innovations in the education system, personnel development and logistics in realising the potential in post-war renewal. Manage. Theory Stud. Rural Bus. Infrastruct. Dev., 45(4): 364-378 (15 pages).
Shortall, S., (2008). Are rural development programmes socially inclusive? Social inclusion, civic engagement, participation, and social capital: exploring the differences. J. Rural Stud., 24(4): 450-457 (8 pages).
Solana-Solana, M., (2010). Rural gentrification in Catalonia, Spain: a case study of migration, social change and conflicts in the Empordanet area. Geoforum., 41(3): 508-517 (10 pages).
Stevanović, M., (2016). The role of financial perspective of entrepreneurship and rural development for the purpose of strengthening Serbian economy. Procedia Social Behav. Sci., 221: 254-261 (8 pages).
Walker, D.H., (2002). Decision support, learning and rural resource management. Agric. Syst., 73(1): 113-127 (15 pages).
Zhu, J.; Yuan, X.; Yuan, X.; Liu, S.; Guan, B.; Sun, J.; Chen, H., (2021). Evaluating the sustainability of rural complex ecosystems during the development of traditional farming villages into tourism destinations: A diachronic emergy approach. J. Rural Stud., 86: 473-484 (12 pages).
  • Receive Date 18 January 2024
  • Revise Date 28 April 2024
  • Accept Date 17 May 2024

Home

Authorship

Submit Manuscript

Indexing and Abstracting

Editorial Board

Unrestricted Reuse in Compliance with BOAI

Open Access Policy

Self-Archiving Policy

Privacy Statement

Publisher Business Model

Publisher and Sponsor

Contact Us