International Journal of Human Capital in Urban Management
Quarterly Publication

A Systematic Review and Evidence-Based Conceptual Framework for Municipal Performance Measurement: Development of Key Performance Indicators

Articles in Press

Document Type : REVIEW PAPER

Authors

K. Fahimi
A. Alaeddini
B. Tolouee

Planning, Human capital development and Council Affairs department, Tehran municipality, Tehran, Iran

Abstract
ABSTRACT:
Municipalities play a central role in improving citizens’ quality of life and advancing sustainable urban development; however, existing municipal performance evaluation approaches remain fragmented, inconsistent across jurisdictions, and insufficiently aligned with evidence-based decision-making, while the lack of standardized indicators limits benchmarking and accountability. This study aimed to systematically identify, synthesize, and structure municipal performance indicators and to develop an evidence-based conceptual framework for municipal performance measurement. A systematic literature review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA 2020) guidelines to identify and consolidate performance indicators reported in previous studies. The extracted indicators were screened, classified, and synthesized into an integrated domain-based framework. Indicator weights were subsequently determined through a Delphi-based expert consensus process, overall municipal performance was assessed using the Simple Weighted Mean, and the results were interpreted through Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats analysis. Six normalization techniques were also applied to ten hypothetical municipalities to examine the robustness and stability of municipality rankings. The systematic review resulted in 77 core indicators and 170 sub-indicators organized into eleven municipal governance domains. Application of the proposed framework showed that, under target-based normalization, Municipality 8 achieved the highest performance score of 59.43%. Comparison of absolute differences among rankings generated by the alternative normalization methods further indicated that vector normalization, following 177 iterations, produced the most robust and stable ranking outcomes. The proposed framework provides a comprehensive and evidence-based architecture for municipal performance measurement by integrating the broad spectrum of municipal responsibilities within an 11-domain key performance indicator system. By combining systematic evidence synthesis, expert-based weighting, SWOT-oriented interpretation, and normalization robustness assessment, the framework offers a practical basis for municipal benchmarking, accountability enhancement, strategic alignment, and evidence-based urban governance.

Keywords

Municipal performance measurement
Systematic review
Key performance indicators
Normalization techniques
Urban governance
Subjects

OPEN ACCESS

©2027 The author(s). This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third-party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit: 

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ 

PUBLISHER NOTE
Tehran Urban Research & Planning Centre (TURPC) takes a neutral position about claims on disputed territories, place names, international boundaries, jurisdiction in published maps, and institutional affiliations. TURPC is committed to retracting a paper after its publication if it becomes apparent that there are serious problems in its content, in terms of research and publication ethics (https://www.ijhcum.net/journal/process?ethics).

CITATION METRICS & CAPTURES

Google Scholar | DOAJ | Scopus | EBSCO | Internet Archive |Twitter |Mendeley  

CURRENT PUBLISHER

 Tehran Urban Research and Planning Center: Tehran Municipality

 

Alexander, C., (2020). The nature of order: An essay on the art of building and the nature of the universe: The process of creating life. Center Environ. Struct.
Alexander, D., (2013). Resilience and disaster risk reduction: An etymological journey. Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 13(11): 2707–2716 (10 pages).
Alam, M. (Ed.), (2010). Municipal infrastructure financing: Innovative practices from developing countries (No. 2). Commonw. Secretariat.
Angelakoglou, K.; Nikolopoulos, N.; Giourka, P.; Svensson, I.-L.; Tsarchopoulos, P.; Tzovaras, D., (2019). A methodological framework for the selection of key performance indicators to assess smart city solutions. Smart Cities, 2(2): 269–306 (38 pages).
Abbasov, R., (2025). Government budgeting and expenditure: A multifaceted analysis of economic growth, fiscal sustainability, and social impact. iBusiness, 17(1): 32–55 (24 pages).
Aldrich, D. P., (2012). Building resilience: Social capital in post-disaster recovery. Univ. Chicago Press.
Armstrong, M., (2006). A handbook of human resource management practice. Kogan Page.
Armstrong, M., (2009). Armstrong’s handbook of performance management: An evidence-based guide to delivering high performance. Kogan Page.
Atkinson, S.; Joyce, K. E., (2011). The place and practices of well-being in local governance. Environ. Plan. C: Gov. Policy, 29(1): 133–148 (16 pages).
Badawy, M.; Abd El-Aziz, A. A.; Idress, A. M.; Hefny, H.; Hossam, S., (2016). A survey on exploring key performance indicators. Future Comput. Inform. J., 1(1–2): 47–52 (6 pages).
Bahl, R.; Linn, J., (1992). Urban public finance in developing countries. Oxford Univ. Press.
Banister, D., (2008). The sustainable mobility paradigm. Transp. Policy, 15(2): 73–80 (8 pages).
Battersby, J., (2017). Food system transformation in the absence of food system planning: The case of supermarket and shopping mall retail expansion in Cape Town, South Africa. Built Environ., 43(3): 417–430 (14 pages).
Berman, E. M.; Bowman, J. S.; West, J. P.; Van Wart, M., (2021). Human resource management in public service: Paradoxes, processes, and problems. CQ Press.
Bisogno, M.; Cuadrado-Ballesteros, B.; García-Sánchez, I. M., (2017). Financial sustainability in local governments: Definition, measurement and determinants. In: Financial sustainability in public administration. Springer, pp. 57–83 (27 pages).
Boyne, G. A. (Ed.), (2006). Public service performance: Perspectives on measurement and management. Cambridge Univ. Press.
Brans, J. P.; Vincke, P.; Mareschal, B., (1986). How to select and how to rank projects: The PROMETHEE method. Eur. J. Oper. Res., 24(2): 228–238 (11 pages).
Brignall, S.; Modell, S., (2000). An institutional perspective on performance measurement and management in the ‘new public sector’. Manage. Account. Res., 11(3): 281–306 (26 pages).
Carmona, M., (2014). The place-shaping continuum: A theory of urban design process. J. Urban Des., 19(1): 2–36 (35 pages).
Cascio, W. F.; Boudreau, J. W., (2016). The search for global competence: From international HR to talent management. J. World Bus., 51(1): 103–114 (12 pages).
Cervero, R., (1998). The transit metropolis: A global inquiry. Island Press.
Creutzig, F.; Jochem, P.; Edelenbosch, O. Y.; Mattauch, L.; Vuuren, D. P. V.; McCollum, D.; Minx, J., (2015). Transport: A roadblock to climate change mitigation? Science, 350(6263): 911–912 (2 pages).
Canton, J., (2015). Future smart: Managing the game-changing trends that will transform your world. Grand Central Publ.
Castells, M., (2015). Networks of outrage and hope: Social movements in the Internet age. John Wiley & Sons.
Cheema, S., (2020). Governance for urban services: Towards political and social inclusion in cities. In: Governance for Urban Services: Access, Participation, Accountability, and Transparency. Springer, pp. 1–30 (30 pages).
Christensen, T.; Lægreid, P.; Rykkja, L. H., (2016). Organizing for crisis management: Building governance capacity and legitimacy. Public Admin. Rev., 76(6): 887–897 (11 pages).
Comfort, L. K., (2007). Crisis management in hindsight: Cognition, communication, coordination, and control. Public Admin. Rev., 67: 189–197 (9 pages).
Crawford, G.; Williams, C., (1985). A note on the analysis of subjective judgment matrices. J. Math. Psychol., 29(4): 387–405 (19 pages).
Creutzig, F.; Jochem, P.; Madanat, S.; Sathaye, J., (2015). Transport demand and climate change mitigation. Energy Policy, 77: 64–72 (9 pages).
Cutter, S. L.; Burton, C. G.; Emrich, C. T., (2010). Disaster resilience indicators for benchmarking baseline conditions. J. Homeland Secur. Emerg. Manage., 7(1): 1–22 (22 pages).
Dalkey, N.; Helmer, O., (1963). An experimental application of the Delphi method to the use of experts. Manage. Sci., 9(3): 458–467 (10 pages).
DeNisi, A. S.; Sonesh, S., (2011). The appraisal and management of performance at work. APA 255–279 (25 pages).
Domínguez, E.; Pérez, B.; Rubio, Á. L.; Zapata, M. A., (2019). A taxonomy for key performance indicators management. Comput. Stand. Interfaces, 64: 24–40 (17 pages).
Drucker, P., (2012). The practice of management. Routledge.
Djatmiko, G. H.; Sinaga, O.; Pawirosumarto, S., (2025). Digital transformation and social inclusion in public services: A qualitative analysis of e-government adoption for marginalized communities. Sustainability, 17(7): 2908 (20 pages).
European Foundation for Quality Management, (2019). The EFQM model. EFQM, Brussels.
Evans, J.; Karvonen, A.; Raven, R., (2016). The experimental city: New modes and prospects of urban transformation. In: The experimental city. Routledge, pp. 1–12 (12 pages).
Excellence Canada, (2018). Excellence, innovation and wellness standard. Excellence Canada, Toronto.
Fainstein, S. S., (2014). The just city. Int. J. Urban Sci., 18(1): 1–18 (18 pages).
Fahimi, K.; Jafari Shahrestani, A.; Zamaninejad, A. R.; Kaboli, F., (2024). Proposing a performance assessment model for the Tehran municipality using TOPSIS and AHP. J. Appl. Res. Ind. Eng., 11(2): 298–317 (20 pages).
Fahimi, K.; Amirabadi, M., (2024). Constructing the organizational excellence model using technique for order of preference by similarity to ideal solution and Analytic hierarchy process. Int. J. Hum. Cap. Urban Manage., 9(1): 157–176 (20 pages).
Franklin, A. L.; Raadschelders, J. C., (2023). What is public administration? The nature of the study. In: Introduction to Governance, Government and Public Administration. Springer Nature Switzerland, Cham, pp. 265–277 (13 pages).
Fichtner, J., (1986). On deriving priority vectors from matrices of pairwise comparisons. Socio-Econ. Plann. Sci., 20(6): 341–345 (5 pages).
Flyvbjerg, B., (2014). What you should know about megaprojects and why: An overview. Proj. Manage. J., 45(2): 6–19 (14 pages).
Fourie, M. L.; Opperman, L.; Scott, D.; Kumar, K., (2011). Municipal finance and accounting. Van Schaik Publ., Pretoria.
Fukuyama, F., (2001). Social capital, civil society and development. Third World Q., 22(1): 7–20 (14 pages).
Galea, S.; Vlahov, D., (2005). Urban health: Evidence, challenges, and directions. Annu. Rev. Public Health, 26(1): 341–365 (25 pages).
Guest, D. E., (2017). Human resource management and employee well-being: Towards a new analytic framework. Hum. Resour. Manage. J., 27(1): 22–38 (17 pages).
Hwang, C. L.; Yoon, K., (1981). Methods for multiple attribute decision making. In: Multiple attribute decision making: Methods and applications a state-of-the-art survey. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, pp. 58–191 (134 pages).
Hara, M.; Nagao, T.; Hannoe, S.; Nakamura, J., (2016). New key performance indicators for a smart sustainable city. Sustainability, 8(3): 206 (15 pages).
Healey, P., (2006). Urban complexity and spatial strategies: Towards a relational planning for our times. Routledge.
Hallegatte, S.; Rentschler, J.; Rozenberg, J., (2019). Lifelines: The resilient infrastructure opportunity. World Bank Publ.
Hsu, C. C.; Sandford, B. A., (2007). The Delphi technique: Making sense of consensus. Pract. Assess. Res. Eval., 12(1): 1–13 (13 pages).
Heinrich, C. J.; Marschke, G., (2010). Incentives and their dynamics in public sector performance management systems. J. Policy Anal. Manage., 29(1): 183–208 (26 pages).
Innes, J. E.; Booher, D. E., (2010). Planning with complexity: An introduction to collaborative rationality for public policy. Routledge.
Jacobson, W. S.; Sowa, J. E., (2015). Strategic human capital management in municipal government. Rev. Public Pers. Admin., 35(1): 5–28 (24 pages).
Jensen, M. C., (1993). The modern industrial revolution, exit, and the failure of internal control systems. J. Finance, 48(3): 831–880 (50 pages).
Kaplan, R. S.; Norton, D. P., (2005). The balanced scorecard: Measures that drive performance. Harv. Bus. Rev., 70: 71–79 (9 pages).
Kaynak, H., (2003). The relationship between total quality management practices and their effects on firm performance. J. Oper. Manage., 21(4): 405–435 (31 pages).
Kelly, J. M.; Swindell, D., (2002). A multiple–indicator approach to municipal service evaluation: Correlating performance measurement and citizen satisfaction across jurisdictions. Public Admin. Rev., 62(5): 610–621 (12 pages).
Kendall, M.G.; Gibbons, J.D., (1990). Rank correlation methods. 5th Ed. Oxford University Press, New York.
Kort, M.; Klijn, E. H., (2011). Public–private partnerships in urban regeneration projects: Organizational form or managerial capacity? Public Admin. Rev., 71(4): 618–626 (9 pages).
Kusek, J. Z.; Rist, R. C., (2004). Ten steps to a results-based monitoring and evaluation system. World Bank.
Kunst, L. S., (2016). United Nations Africa Human Development Report 2016: Accelerating gender equality and women’s empowerment in Africa. UNDP.
Lanin, D.; Hermanto, N., (2019). The effect of service quality toward public satisfaction and public trust on local government in Indonesia. Int. J. Soc. Econ., 46(3): 377–392 (16 pages).
Lægreid, P.; Rykkja, L. H., (2022). Accountability and inter-organizational collaboration within the state. Public Manage. Rev., 24(5): 683–703 (21 pages).
Latupeirissa, J. J. P.; Dewi, N. L. Y.; Prayana, I. K. R.; Srikandi, M. B.; Ramadiansyah, S. A.; Pramana, I. B. G. A. Y., (2024). Transforming public service delivery: A comprehensive review of digitization initiatives. Sustainability, 16(7): 2818 (20 pages).
Lee, J.; Yoon, Y., (2021). Indicators development to support intelligent road infrastructure in urban cities. Transp. Policy, 114: 252–265 (14 pages).
Linstone, H. A.; Turoff, M. (Eds.), (1975). The Delphi method. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, pp. 3–12 (10 pages).
Litman, T., (2011). Measuring transportation, traffic, mobility and accessibility. Victoria Transp. Policy Inst.
Litman, T., (2025). Evaluating public transportation benefits and costs. Victoria Transp. Policy Inst.
Lucas, K., (2012). Transport and social exclusion: Where are we now? Transp. Policy, 20: 105–113 (9 pages).
Marsden, G.; Reardon, L., (2017). Questions of governance: Rethinking the study of transportation policy. Transp. Res. Part A: Policy Pract., 101: 238–251 (14 pages).
Mazur-Wierzbicka, E., (2021). Circular economy: Advancement of European Union countries. Environ. Sci. Eur., 33(1): 111 (15 pages).
Marans, R. W.; Stimson, R. J. (Eds.), (2011). Investigating quality of urban life: Theory, methods, and empirical research (Vol. 45). Springer.
McGlade, J.; Bankoff, G.; Abrahams, J.; Cooper-Knock, S. J.; Cotecchia, F.; Desanker, P.; Wood, M., (2019). Global assessment report on disaster risk reduction 2019. UN Office Disaster Risk Reduct.
Miletzki, J.; Broten, N., (2017). An analysis of Amartya Sen’s Development as freedom. Macat Library.
Mikhailov, L., (2003). Deriving priorities from fuzzy pairwise comparison judgements. Fuzzy Sets Syst., 134(3): 365–385 (21 pages).
National Institute of Standards and Technology, (2021). Baldrige excellence framework: Proven leadership and management practices for organizational excellence. U.S. Dept. Commerce, Gaithersburg, MD.
Niemelä, J.; Saarela, S. R.; Söderman, T.; Kopperoinen, L.; Yli-Pelkonen, V.; Väre, S.; Kotze, D. J., (2010). Using the ecosystem services approach for better planning and conservation of urban green spaces: A Finland case study. Biodivers. Conserv., 19(11): 3225–3243 (19 pages).
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) Staff, (2017). The governance of land use in OECD countries: Policy analysis and recommendations. OECD.
OECD, (2017). The governance of land use in OECD countries: Policy analysis and recommendations. OECD Publ.
OECD, (2017). Government at a Glance 2017. OECD Publ.
OECD, (2017). How’s Life? Measuring Well-being. OECD Publ.
OECD Staff, (2017). The governance of land use in OECD countries: Policy analysis and recommendations. OECD Publ.
Okoli, C.; Pawlowski, S. D., (2004). The Delphi method as a research tool: An example, design considerations and applications. Inform. Manage., 42(1): 15–29 (15 pages).
Onyango, G., (2019). Organizational trust and accountability reforms in public management: Analysis of inter-agency implementation relations in Kenya. Int. J. Public Admin., 42(10): 874–889 (16 pages).
Onyango, G., (2020). Legislative oversight and policy-reforms in “unsettled” political contexts of public administration. Int. J. Public Admin., 43(3): 213–228 (16 pages).
Opricovic, S.; Tzeng, G. H., (2004). Compromise solution by MCDM methods: A comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS. Eur. J. Oper. Res., 156(2): 445–455 (11 pages).
Putnam, R. D., (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. Simon & Schuster.
Pacione, M., (2003). Urban environmental quality and human wellbeing: A social geographical perspective. Landsc. Urban Plan., 65(1–2): 19–30 (12 pages).
Page, M.J.; McKenzie, J.E.; Bossuyt, P.M.; Boutron, I.; Hoffmann, T.C.; Mulrow, C.D.; Shamseer, L.; Tetzlaff, J.M.; Akl, E.A., Brennan, S.E.; and Chou, R., (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. bmj, 372: n71 (10 pages)
Paton, D., (2003). Disaster preparedness: A social-cognitive perspective. Disaster Prev. Manage., 12(3): 210–216 (7 pages).
Parmenter, D., (2015). Key performance indicators: Developing, implementing, and using winning KPIs. John Wiley & Sons.
Pemberton, J. D.; Stonehouse, G. H.; Yarrow, D. J., (2001). Benchmarking and the role of organizational learning in developing competitive advantage. Knowl. Process Manage., 8(2): 123–135 (13 pages).
Pulakos, E. D.; Mueller-Hanson, R.; Arad, S., (2019). The evolution of performance management: Searching for value. Annu. Rev. Organ. Psychol. Organ. Behav., 6(1): 249–271 (23 pages).
Pyykkönen, M., (2012). UNESCO and cultural diversity: Democratisation, commodification or governmentalisation of culture? Int. J. Cult. Policy, 18(5): 545–562 (18 pages).
Rezaei, J., (2015). Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method. Omega, 53: 49–57 (9 pages).
Roberts, P.; Sykes, H. (Eds.), (1999). Urban regeneration: A handbook. Sage.
Rockström, J.; Steffen, W.; Noone, K.; Persson, Å.; Chapin III, F. S.; Lambin, E.; Foley, J., (2009). Planetary boundaries: Exploring the safe operating space for humanity. Ecol. Soc., 14(2): 32 (32 pages).
Saaty, T. L., (1980). The analytic hierarchy process. McGraw-Hill.
Saaty, T. L., (2004). Fundamentals of the analytic network process—Dependence and feedback in decision-making with a single network. J. Syst. Sci. Syst. Eng., 13(2): 129–157 (29 pages).
Scheer, A. W., (2002). Business process excellence: ARIS in practice. Springer, Berlin/New York.
Serrano, M.; Griffor, E.; Wollman, D.; Dunaway, M.; Burns, M.; Rhee, S.; Greer, C., (2022). Smart cities and communities: A key performance indicators framework. NIST Spec. Publ.
Sen, A., (2014). Development as freedom. In: The globalization and development reader: Perspectives on development and global change. Routledge, pp. 525 (20 pages).
Shah, A. (Ed.), (2006). Local governance in developing countries. World Bank Publ.
Shannon, C. E., (1948). A mathematical theory of communication. Bell Syst. Tech. J., 27(3): 379–423 (45 pages).
Sahoo, S. K.; Goswami, S. S., (2023). A comprehensive review of multiple criteria decision-making (MCDM) methods: Advancements, applications, and future directions. Decis. Making Adv., 1(1): 25–48 (24 pages).
Smith, W. K., (2014). Dynamic decision making: A model of senior leaders managing strategic paradoxes. Acad. Manage. J., 57(6): 1592–1623 (32 pages).
Supply Chain Council, (2008). Supply Chain Operations Reference (SCOR) model, Version 9.0. Supply Chain Council Inc.
Talen, E., (2012). City rules: How regulations affect urban form. Island Press.
Tamiz, M.; Jones, D. F.; El-Darzi, E., (1995). A review of goal programming and its applications. Ann. Oper. Res., 58(1): 39–53 (15 pages).
Taticchi, P.; Balachandran, K.; Tonelli, F., (2012). Performance measurement and management systems: State of the art, guidelines for design and challenges. Meas. Bus. Excell., 16(2): 41–54 (14 pages).
Tausanovitch, C.; Warshaw, C., (2014). Representation in municipal government. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev., 108(3): 605–641 (37 pages).
Taylor, F. W., (1911). The principles of scientific management. NuVision Publ.
Thapa, I., (2020). Local government: Concept, roles and importance for contemporary society. Public Admin. Campus, 4: 10.13140 (20 pages).
Thesari, S. S.; Lizot, M.; Trojan, F., (2021). Municipal public budget planning with sustainable and human development goals integrated in a multi-criteria approach. Sustainability, 13(19): 10921 (18 pages).
Throsby, D., (2010). The economics of cultural policy. Cambridge Univ. Press.
Tierney, K., (2020). The social roots of risk: Producing disasters, promoting resilience. Stanford Univ. Press.
UN-Habitat, (2022). World Cities Report 2022: Envisaging the future of cities. United Nations Human Settlements Programme.
Ubaid, A. M.; Dweiri, F. T.; Ojiako, U., (2020). Organizational excellence methodologies (OEMs): A systematic literature review. Int. J. Syst. Assur. Eng. Manage., 11(6): 1395–1432 (38 pages).
Union of Japanese Scientists and Engineers, (2010). Deming Prize. JUSE, Tokyo.
UN-Habitat, (2022). World Cities Report 2022: Envisaging the future of cities. UN.
Valmohammadi, C.; Servati, A., (2011). Performance measurement system implementation using Balanced Scorecard and statistical methods. Int. J. Product. Perform. Manage., 60(5): 493–511 (19 pages).
Walker, R. M.; Andrews, R., (2015). Local government management and performance: A review of evidence. J. Public Admin. Res. Theory, 25(1): 101–133 (33 pages).
Wilson, D. C.; Velis, C.; Cheeseman, C., (2006). Role of informal sector recycling in waste management. Habitat Int., 30(4): 797–808 (12 pages).
 

LETTERS TO EDITOR

International Journal of Human Capital in Urban Management (IJHCUM) welcomes letters to the editor for the post-publication discussions and corrections which allows debate post publication on its site, through the Letters to Editor. Letters pertaining to manuscript published in IJHCUM should be sent to the editorial office of IJHCUM within three months of either online publication or before printed publication, except for critiques of original research. Following points are to be considering before sending the letters (comments) to the editor.


[1] Letters that include statements of statistics, facts, research, or theories should include appropriate references, although more than three are discouraged.

[2] Letters that are personal attacks on an author rather than thoughtful criticism of the author’s ideas will not be considered for publication.

[3] Letters can be no more than 300 words in length.

[4] Letter writers should include a statement at the beginning of the letter stating that it is being submitted either for publication or not.

[5] Anonymous letters will not be considered.

[6] Letter writers must include their city and state of residence or work.

[7] Letters will be edited for clarity and length.

Send comment about this article
Enter Name.
Enter a valid email address.
Enter a vaid affiliation.
Enter comments (At leaset 10 words)
CAPTCHA Image
Enter Security Code Correctly.
International Journal of Human Capital in Urban Management

Articles in Press, Accepted Manuscript
Available Online from 26 October 2026

  • Receive Date 07 January 2026
  • Revise Date 20 June 2026
  • Accept Date 24 October 2026

Home

Authorship

Submit Manuscript

Indexing and Abstracting

Editorial Board

Unrestricted Reuse in Compliance with BOAI

Open Access Policy

Self-Archiving Policy

Privacy Statement

Publisher Business Model

Publisher and Sponsor

Contact Us