International Journal of Human Capital in Urban Management
Quarterly Publication

Navigating the Shift: Exploring Barriers and Enablers of Agile Workforce Planning in Asia Pacific region

Articles in Press

Document Type : ORIGINAL RESEARCH ARTICLE

Authors

A. Khalid 1
H. Vasudevan 1
S. Y. Lee 1
K. Muhammad 2
S. R. Xavier 1
N. Abd Rahman 3
H. D. Madon 1

1 Tun Razak Graduate School, Universiti Tun Abdul Razak, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

2 Administration of Education, Teacher Training and Education, University of Bengkulu, Indonesia.

3 Faculty of Business and Communication, INTI International University, Persiaran Perdana BBN, Putra Nilai, 71800 Nilai, Negeri Sembilan, Malaysia

Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Many organizations in the Asia-Pacific region still use outdated annual workforce planning methods that fail to match the fast-evolving business landscape and changing skill needs. Agile Workforce Planning is gaining global recognition for its flexibility, but APAC organizations encounter structural, cultural, and governance obstacles that hinder its implementation. Most literature on Agile Workforce Planning is Western-centric, providing scant insight into its application in the Asia-Pacific region context. This study explores the perceptions and experiences of HR practitioners in APAC organizations regarding workforce planning and recruitment, aiming to identify the main enablers, barriers, and outcomes related to Agile Workforce Planning.
METHODS: A qualitative research design involved semi-structured interviews with six HR practitioners from APAC organizations. A pilot with six interviews tested question clarity and relevance but was excluded from the final analysis. Purposive sampling was used for participant selection, and thematic analysis was performed to identify data patterns.
FINDINGS: Agile Workforce Planning is facilitated by strong leadership, collaboration between HR and business leaders, and access to workforce data and analytics. Implementation is limited by governance frameworks, budgetary and approval processes, and cultural barriers such as managerial reluctance to redeploy talent and a general aversion to risk. Agile Workforce Planning is typically executed in a reactive, incremental way instead of as a comprehensive planning strategy. A more complete implementation can improve an organization's responsiveness, focus on essential roles, and alignment with market conditions. These positive outcomes may lead to increased pressure on talent acquisition teams and create uncertainty for employees.
CONCLUSION: This study enhances the Agile Workforce Planning literature by offering qualitative insights from the APAC region. It highlights that achieving agility necessitates leadership-driven cultural changes, improved governance, and increased workforce visibility. The research provides a foundational framework and roadmap for APAC organizations' HR leaders to transform agile intentions into effective workforce planning outcomes.

Keywords

Agile workforce planning
Enablers of agile workforce planning
Barriers to agile workforce planning
Perceived outcomes of agile workforce planning
Subjects

OPEN ACCESS

©2027 The author(s). This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third-party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit: 

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ 

PUBLISHER NOTE
Tehran Urban Research & Planning Centre (TURPC) takes a neutral position about claims on disputed territories, place names, international boundaries, jurisdiction in published maps, and institutional affiliations. TURPC is committed to retracting a paper after its publication if it becomes apparent that there are serious problems in its content, in terms of research and publication ethics (https://www.ijhcum.net/journal/process?ethics).

CITATION METRICS & CAPTURES

Google Scholar | DOAJ | Scopus | EBSCO | Internet Archive |Twitter |Mendeley  

CURRENT PUBLISHER

 Tehran Urban Research and Planning Center: Tehran Municipality

 

Ajzen, I., (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process., 50(2): 179–211. (33 pages)
Anggara, S., (2025). Public policy reform in Indonesia: Navigating bureaucratic culture in the age of disruption. Tec Empre., 20(2): 716-728 (13 pages)
Austen, A.; Piwowar-Sulej, K., (2025). An integrative literature review on sustainability-oriented HRM: how multilevel thinking may help to extend the state of the art. J. Change Manag., 25(3): 229-259 (31 pages)
Babashahi, L.; Barbosa, C. E.; Lima, Y.; Lyra, A.; Salazar, H.; Argôlo, M.; Souza, J. M. D., (2024). AI in the workplace: A systematic review of skill transformation in the industry. Adm. Sci., 14(6): 2-28 (27 pages)
Billing, F.; De Smet, A.; Reich, A.; Schaninger, B., (2021). Building workforce skills at scale to thrive during—and after—the COVID-19 crisis. Designed by McKinsey Global Publishing (1 page)
Breu, K.; Hemingway, C. J.; Strathern, M.; Bridger, D., (2002). Workforce agility: the new employee strategy for the knowledge economy. J. Inf. Technol., 17(1): 21-31 (11 pages)
Burns, T.; Stalker, G. M., (1994). The management of innovation. Oxford University Press (1 page)
Chan, J. I. L.; Muthuveloo, R., (2020). Vital organisational capabilities for strategic agility: An empirical study. Asia-Pac. J. Bus. Admin., 12(3/4): 223–236 (14 pages)
Chandratreya, A., (2025). Building a future-ready public sector cultural shift in digital governance. In Digital competency development for public officials: Adapting new technologies in public services (pp. 517-544). IGI Global Scientific Publishing (28 pages)
Chong, S. S. F.; Ong, S. H. M.; Long, S. M.; Kanno, M.; Harnpramukkul, U.; Wong, K. C.; Binos, R. S. R., (2024). Advancements in regulatory agility, regional collaboration, and digital transformation: insights from the Asia Partnership Conference of Pharmaceutical Associations (APAC). AAPS Open., 10(1): 2-19 (18 pages)
Creswell, J. W.; Poth, C. N., (2016). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Sage publications (1 page)
Ding, Y.; Pulford, J.; Bates, I., (2020). Practical actions for fostering cross-disciplinary global health research: lessons from a narrative literature review. BMJ global health., 5(4): 1-13 (13 pages)
Gandhi, L., (2023). HR challenges in the post-Covid-19 world: role of agile leadership towards organizational effectiveness. In Agile Leadership for Industry 4.0 (pp. 285-296). Apple Academic Press. (12 pages)
Jio, W.; Kant, S.; Lemi, K., (2025). Ethical Leadership: Effect on Future of Organizational Citizenship Behavior by Mediation of Organizational Culture in Ethiopia. In Generation Alpha and Next Generation Leadership for Greener Futures (pp. 41-62). IGI Global Scientific Publishing (22 pages)
Jooss, S.; Collings, D. G.; McMackin, J.; Dickmann, M., (2024). A skills‐matching perspective on talent management: Developing strategic agility. Human Resource Manag., 63(1): 141-157 (17 pages)
Kotter, J. P., (2012). Leading change. Harvard business press (1 page)
Lewin, K., (1951). Field theory in social science. New York: Harper & Row (1 page)
Marku, M., (2024). Navigating the future of work: human capital in the age of industry 4.0. Interdisciplinary J. Res. Dev., 11(1): 190-195 (6 pages)
Muduli, A., (2016). Exploring the facilitators and mediators of workforce agility: an empirical study. Manag. Res. Review, 39(12): 1567-1586 (20 pages)
Nwisagbo, A. E.; Osuji, C. U.; Amachree, T., (2025). Leading changes in education: Strategies for managing resistance and building buy-in. Int. J. Educ. Manag., Rivers State University., 1(1): 387-402 (16 pages)
Petermann, M. K. H.; Zacher, H., (2022). Workforce agility: Development and validation of a multidimensional measure. Front. Psychol., 13: 1-15 (15 page)
Reilly, P.; Williams, T., (2016). Strategic HR: Building the capability to deliver. Routledge (1 page)
Singh, D.; Kataria, A., (2025). Mapping workforce agility: an ADO–TCM-guided systematic review and research agenda. J. Bus. Strategy, 1-23 (23 pages)
Tajpour, M.; Dekamini, F.; Madadpour, F.; Norouzimovahed, M.; SafarMohammadluo, S., (2024). A decision-making framework in family-owned hotels for evaluating and selecting suppliers and strategic partners. J. Family Bus. Manag., 14(6): 1084–1098 (15 pages)
Triandis, H. C., (1982). Review of culture's consequences: International differences in work-related values. Hum. Org., 41(1): 86-90 (5 pages)
Vakola, M.; Nikolaou, I., (2005). Attitudes towards organizational change: The role of employees’ stress and commitment. Emp. Relations., 27(2): 160–174 (15 pages)
Van der Laan, L.; Yap, J., (2016). Foresight & Strategy in the Asia Pacific Region. Management for Professionals. Springer Singapore., 181-198 (18 pages)
Wang, A., (2024). Enhancing HR management through HRIS and data analytics. Appl. Comput. Eng., 64(1): 223-229 (7 pages)
Wijayanayake, J.; Meher, K. C.; Prasad, N.; Herath, P., (2025). THE WINNING FROM WITHIN: HARNESSING THE HUMAN FACTOR FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE THROUGH ERP IMPLEMENTATION IN SMES OF THE APAC REGION: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW, 1-16 (16 pages)
Zhixian, S. A., (2015). Leadership constructs and assessment (No. 13). The Head Foundation Working Paper Series (1 page)
 

LETTERS TO EDITOR

International Journal of Human Capital in Urban Management (IJHCUM) welcomes letters to the editor for the post-publication discussions and corrections which allows debate post publication on its site, through the Letters to Editor. Letters pertaining to manuscript published in IJHCUM should be sent to the editorial office of IJHCUM within three months of either online publication or before printed publication, except for critiques of original research. Following points are to be considering before sending the letters (comments) to the editor.


[1] Letters that include statements of statistics, facts, research, or theories should include appropriate references, although more than three are discouraged.

[2] Letters that are personal attacks on an author rather than thoughtful criticism of the author’s ideas will not be considered for publication.

[3] Letters can be no more than 300 words in length.

[4] Letter writers should include a statement at the beginning of the letter stating that it is being submitted either for publication or not.

[5] Anonymous letters will not be considered.

[6] Letter writers must include their city and state of residence or work.

[7] Letters will be edited for clarity and length.

Send comment about this article
Enter Name.
Enter a valid email address.
Enter a vaid affiliation.
Enter comments (At leaset 10 words)
CAPTCHA Image
Enter Security Code Correctly.
International Journal of Human Capital in Urban Management

Articles in Press, Accepted Manuscript
Available Online from 23 August 2026

  • Receive Date 21 November 2025
  • Revise Date 15 June 2026
  • Accept Date 21 August 2026

Home

Authorship

Submit Manuscript

Indexing and Abstracting

Editorial Board

Unrestricted Reuse in Compliance with BOAI

Open Access Policy

Self-Archiving Policy

Privacy Statement

Publisher Business Model

Publisher and Sponsor

Contact Us