International Journal of Human Capital in Urban Management
Quarterly Publication

Flexible manufacturing systems and their role in human resource sustainability: Analytical study

Articles in Press

Document Type : ORIGINAL RESEARCH ARTICLE

Authors

R. A. Hussein 1
A. K. Hussein 2
N. Y. Mohammed 1
A. S. Yousif 1

1 Technical College of Management/Mosul, Northern Technical University, Mosul, 41001, Iraq

2 College of Management and Economics, University of Mosul, Mosul, 41001, Iraq

https://doi.org/10.22034/IJHCUM.2026.04.08
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: This study investigated how Flexible Manufacturing Systems—including workstations, automated handling/storage, inspection equipment, ancillary components, and computer control—were related to Human Resource sustainability (justice, job well-being, and employee development) at the Samarra Pharmaceutical Factory. The objective was to identify which FMS dimensions most strongly supported sustainable HR outcomes.
METHODS: A descriptive–analytical design was used. A structured questionnaire was administered to 230 employees; 207 valid responses were obtained (response rate = 90%). The measurement model and hypotheses were tested in AMOS v26 using standard validation criteria and structural equation modeling.
RESULTS: Overall FMS capability was positively associated with HR sustainability (standardized regression weight = 0.932; unstandardized estimate = 2.079; 95% CI = 0.896–0.971; p = 0.02). Bivariate correlations between individual FMS components and HR sustainability were significant: workstations r = 0.841 (α = 0.05), handling & storage r = 0.833 (α = 0.05), inspection equipment r = 0.644 (α = 0.05), computer control systems r = 0.902 (α = 0.05), and other components r = 0.928 (α = 0.05). Model fit indices met accepted thresholds (e.g., GFI = 0.927, AGFI = 0.916, RMR = 0.068, NFI = 0.913, RFI = 0.905).
CONCLUSION: Strengthening Flexible Manufacturing Systems—particularly computer control systems—was associated with higher HR sustainability by improving safety, reducing physical/psychological strain, and expanding development opportunities. Managers seeking technology investments that advance operational efficiency and workforce well-being could prioritize FMS upgrades aligned with these results.

Keywords

Automated material handling
Computer control systems
Employee development
Flexible manufacturing systems
Human resource sustainability
Structural equation modeling
Subjects

OPEN ACCESS

©2026 The author(s). This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third-party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit: 

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ 

PUBLISHER NOTE
Tehran Urban Research & Planning Centre (TURPC) takes a neutral position about claims on disputed territories, place names, international boundaries, jurisdiction in published maps, and institutional affiliations. TURPC is committed to retracting a paper after its publication if it becomes apparent that there are serious problems in its content, in terms of research and publication ethics (https://www.ijhcum.net/journal/process?ethics).

CITATION METRICS & CAPTURES

Google Scholar | DOAJ | Scopus | EBSCO | Internet Archive |Twitter |Mendeley  

CURRENT PUBLISHER

 Tehran Urban Research and Planning Center: Tehran Municipality

 

 
Al-Abadi, A. R.; Aziz, S. A., (2017). The effect of organizational socialization in creative behavior: the mediating role for employees’ well-being. Iraqi J. Adm. Sci., 13(53): 151–191(41pages).
Al-Awimer, H. H.; Al-Shabli, H. H., (2024). The impact of employee well-being on job loyalty: the mediating role of job satisfaction—an empirical study of telecommunications companies in Jordan. Arab J. Manage. 44(5): 243-260 (18 pages).
Al-Ghannam, M. A., (2022). The effect of applying the fundamentals of lean manufacturing on competitive advantage strategies: a field study. J. Contemp. Bus. Stud. 8(13): 235-269 (35 pages).
Al-Khalayleh, F. O., (2019). The impact of applying human resource development strategy on the performance of employees: case study on the Al Hassan Industrial City–Jordan. J. Taibah Univ.  13(10): 1955–1968 (14 pages).
Anlesinya, A.; Susomrith, P., (2020). Sustainable human resource management: a systematic review of a developing field. J. Global Responsib., 11(1): 79–94 (16 pages).
Balal, S. B. I.; Mohammed, B. M.; Al-Dosari, M., (2025). The mediating role of positive organizational behavior in the relationship between perceived organizational justice and service performance: a study of service institutions in Eastern Province, Saudi Arabia. Univ. Kirkuk J. Adm. Econ. Sci. 15(1): 328–340 (13 pages).
Blecha, P.; Jankovych, R.; Holub, M.; Sramek, J.; Marek, T.; Jelínek, A.; Marek, J., (2025). Evaluation of measurement capability when using CNC machine tools as a measurement system. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 138: 585–601 (17 pages).
 
Blondheim Jr., D. J., (2025). The 6C framework to build a connected factory. Inter Metalcast (Advance online publication): 1–21 (21 pages).
Cherian, J.; Farouk, S., (2017). Impact of sustainable human resource practices on organizational performance. Int. J. Manage. Appl. Sci. 3(8): 35–39 (5 pages).
Dumitrana, M.; Dumitru, M.; Jianu, I.; Jinga, G.; Radu, G., (2009). Human resources role in sustainable development. Seria Ştiinţe Economice. 6(3): 44–53 (10 pages).
Ehnert, I., (2006). Sustainability issues in human resource management: linkages, theoretical approaches, and outlines for an emerging field. Proceedings of the 21st EIASM SHRM Workshop, Aston, Birmingham, UK, March 28–29: 1–22 (22 pages).
Ewis, M.; Elsebaey, A.; Obayah, H., (2025). The impact of supply chain flexibility on organizational excellence: an empirical study on the Egyptian pharmaceutical manufacturing companies. Sci. J. Bus. Res. Stud. 39(1): 1609–1616 (8 pages).
Groover, M. P., (2008). Automation, production systems, and computer-integrated manufacturing. 3rd ed. Pearson Education, Upper Saddle River, NJ. (815 pages).
Haller, J.; Kaven, L.; Göppert, A.; Schmitt, R. H., (2025). Industry 4.0 advancements in discrete production ramp-ups: a systematic literature review. J. Intell. Manuf. (Advance online publication): 1–21 (21 pages).
Hamidi, B. R., (2018). The effect of developing flexible lean, green production systems in directing managerial accounting thought toward a strategic approach. J. Adm. Econ. 41(117): 204–222 (19 pages).
Jones, N.; Bromley, C.; Creegan, C.; Kinsella, R., (2010). Building understanding of fairness, equality and good relations. National Centre for Social Research and Scottish Centre for Social Research. 1–137 (137 pages).
Kalogiannidis, S.; Chatzitheodoridis, F.; Giannarakis, G.; Mavrommati, A., (2022). Business organizations’ flexibility as an innovation tool: factors affecting flexibility in organizations. J. Logist. Informatics Serv. Sci. 9(4): 259–312 (54 pages).
Kaushal, A.; Vardhan, A.; Rajput, R. S., (2016). Flexible manufacturing system: a modern approach to manufacturing technology. Int. Ref. J. Eng. Sci. 5(4): 62–67 (6 pages).
Kavaliauskiene, I. M.; Çiğdem, Ş.; Yildiz, B., (2022). The effect of supply chain learning on flexibility performance: an empirical study. Indep. J. Manag. Prod. 13(2): 841–859 (19 pages).
Kostal, P.; Velisek, K., (2011). Flexible manufacturing system. Int. J. Ind. Manuf. Eng. 5(5): 917–918 (2 pages).
Kumar, S.; Goyal, A.; Singhal, A., (2017). Manufacturing flexibility and its effect on system performance. Jordan J. Mech. Ind. Eng. 11(2): 105–112 (8 pages).
Lafou, M.; Mathieu, L.; Pois, S.; Alochet, M., (2016). Manufacturing system flexibility: sequence flexibility assessment. Procedia CIRP 41: 425–430 (6 pages).
Liu, C., (2024). The role of human resource management in sustainable development. Int. J. Educ. Humanit. 14(3): 118–122 (5 pages).
Lu, Y.; Zhang, M.; Yang, M. M.; Wang, Y., (2023). Sustainable human resource management practices, employee resilience, and employee outcomes: toward common good values. Hum. Resour. Manage. 62(3): 331–353 (23 pages).
Sas, A. L., (2022). How sustainable human resource management affects work engagement and perceived employability. Econ. Sociol., 15(4): 65–80 (16 pages).
Schroeder, H., (2012). The importance of human resource management in strategic sustainability: an art and science perspective. J. Environ. Sustain., 2(2): 75–82 (8 pages).
Shukla, S.; Gangwar, P., (2021). Flexible manufacturing system. Int. Res. J. Eng. Technol. 8(9): 641–647 (7 pages).
Spooner, K.; Kaine, S., (2010). Defining sustainability and human resource management. Int. Employ. Relat. Rev. 16(2): 70–81 (12 pages).
Stankevičiūtė, Ž.; Savanevičienė, A., (2018). Designing sustainable HRM: the core characteristics of emerging field. Sustainability 10(12): 4798 (23 pages).
 
Vanka, S.; Madasu, B. R.; Singh, S.; Pulaparthi, M. R., (2020). Sustainable human resource management: transforming organizations, societies and environment. Springer Nature, Singapore.1–313 (312 pages).
Yeoman, R.; Santos, M., (2016). Fairness and organizational performance: insights for supply chain   
             management. Mutuality in Business Briefing Paper No. 3, Saïd Business School, University of
             Oxford. 1–31 (31 pages).
 

LETTERS TO EDITOR

International Journal of Human Capital in Urban Management (IJHCUM) welcomes letters to the editor for the post-publication discussions and corrections which allows debate post publication on its site, through the Letters to Editor. Letters pertaining to manuscript published in IJHCUM should be sent to the editorial office of IJHCUM within three months of either online publication or before printed publication, except for critiques of original research. Following points are to be considering before sending the letters (comments) to the editor.


[1] Letters that include statements of statistics, facts, research, or theories should include appropriate references, although more than three are discouraged.

[2] Letters that are personal attacks on an author rather than thoughtful criticism of the author’s ideas will not be considered for publication.

[3] Letters can be no more than 300 words in length.

[4] Letter writers should include a statement at the beginning of the letter stating that it is being submitted either for publication or not.

[5] Anonymous letters will not be considered.

[6] Letter writers must include their city and state of residence or work.

[7] Letters will be edited for clarity and length.

Send comment about this article
Enter Name.
Enter a valid email address.
Enter a vaid affiliation.
Enter comments (At leaset 10 words)
CAPTCHA Image
Enter Security Code Correctly.
International Journal of Human Capital in Urban Management

Articles in Press, Accepted Manuscript
Available Online from 08 January 2026

  • Receive Date 21 August 2025
  • Revise Date 29 November 2025
  • Accept Date 03 January 2026

Article View 3,417

Home

Authorship

Submit Manuscript

Indexing and Abstracting

Editorial Board

Unrestricted Reuse in Compliance with BOAI

Open Access Policy

Self-Archiving Policy

Privacy Statement

Publisher Business Model

Publisher and Sponsor

Contact Us