Utilizing Virtual Reality in the participatory urban policy-making process: A step toward facilitating effective citizen engagement

Document Type : REVIEW PAPER

Authors

1 Department of Urban Planning and Design, School of Architecture and Urban Studies, Iran University of Art, Tehran, Iran.

2 Department of Landscape Architecture, School of Architecture and Environmental Design, Iran University of Science and Technology, Tehran, Iran.

Abstract
In traditional participatory urban processes, effective collaboration among designers, citizens, and urban managers is often hindered by inadequate environmental visualization, inefficient communication tools, and limited appeal. These challenges, particularly related to time, cost, and the difficulty of attracting diverse participants, have prompted researchers to explore alternative tools and technologies to enhance citizen involvement. Virtual Reality modeling has emerged as a promising technology for urban design, planning, and management, offering improved ways to visualize spaces, develop creative ideas, and support the realization of urban policies. This research is qualitative and developmental in purpose, and it is classified as a review study with an interpretive perspective. The methods employed include documentary analysis and case studies, with data collected from documents, library resources, and relevant articles in this field. The study draws on theoretical frameworks such as Arnstein’s Ladder of Citizen Participation and Healey’s Collaborative Planning Theory to examine Virtual Reality's potential in participatory processes. The study addresses the limitations of traditional participatory methods, highlighting how Virtual Reality technology can facilitate more accessible, inclusive, and efficient urban policymaking processes. Despite technological limitations, physical and psychological constraints, ethical concerns, and issues related to privacy and legal matters, the findings indicate that virtual Reality offers significant potential in participatory urban processes. By providing immersive simulations, virtual Reality can improve transparency, enhance stakeholder collaboration, and facilitate informed decision-making in urban planning. The technology's ability to engage diverse demographic groups, particularly those reluctant to engage in traditional methods, shows promise for making urban policy discussions more interactive and understandable. Virtual Reality presents a valuable tool for overcoming the limitations of conventional participatory processes and holds promise for enhancing urban policymaking. The study identifies several avenues for future exploration, including improving accessibility, addressing ethical concerns, and developing hybrid engagement models that integrate Virtual reality with traditional methods. Empirical evaluations of Virtual Reality’s impact on decision-making and stakeholder engagement are also recommended to optimize its application in urban governance. Its potential benefits make it an important area for further exploration of urban planning and participatory governance.
 

Graphical Abstract

Utilizing Virtual Reality in the participatory urban policy-making process: A step toward facilitating effective citizen engagement

Keywords

Subjects
  1. Agudelo-Vélez, A.; Sarmiento-Ordosgoitia, I.; Córdoba-Maquilón, J. (2021). Virtual reality as a new tool for transport data collection. Arch. Transp., 60(4): 23–38 (16 pages).

     Al Shawabkeh, R.; Arar, M. (2024). The role of virtual reality in improving neighborhood park design: A comparative study of virtual reality and traditional approaches. Int. J. Geoheritage Parks: 75–97 (23 pages).

    Al-Kodmany, K. (2020). Tall buildings and the city: Improving the understanding of placemaking, imageability, and tourism. Springer Nature: 83–119 (37 pages).

    Al-Kodmany, K. (2002). Visualization tools and methods in community planning: from freehand sketches to virtual reality, J. Plan. Lit., 17(2): 189–211 (23 pages).

    Arabiun, A.; Tajpour, M.; Zahedi, M. R. (2024). The effect of digital leadership on the performance of businesses: the mediating role of organizational entrepreneurship. International Journal of Human Capital in Urban Management., 9(1): 17–28 (12 pages).

    Araiza-Alba, P.; Keane, T.; Chen, W. S.; Kaufman, J. (2021). Immersive virtual reality as a tool to learn problem-solving skills. Comput. Educ., 164: 1–33 (34 pages).

     

    Bakhanova, E.; Garcia, J. A.; Raffe, W. L.; Voinov, A. (2020). Targeting social learning and engagement: What serious games and gamification can offer to participatory modeling. Environ. Modell. Software., 134: 1–15 (15 pages).

    Barki, H.; Hartwick, J. (1989). Rethinking the concept of user involvement. MIS Quarterly: 53–63 (11 pages).

    Baniasadi, T.; Niakan Kalhori, S. R.; Ayyoubzadeh, S. M.; Zakerabasali, S.; Pourmohamadkhan, M. (2018). Study of challenges to utilize mobile-based health care monitoring systems: a descriptive literature review. J. Telemed. Telecare., 24(10): 661–668 (8 pages).

    Basu, A. (2019). A brief chronology of Virtual Reality. Preprint submitted to ArXiv, November 22: 1–18 (18 pages).

    Batty, M. (2013). Big data, smart cities, and city planning. Dialogues in Human Geography., 3(3): 274–279 (6 pages).

    Boertien, R. (2021). Immersive Virtual Reality, a participatory-enhancing tool for collaborative spatial planning and design (Doctoral dissertation): 1–73 (73 pages).

    Boos, Bolton, T.; Dargahi, T.; Belguith, S.; Al-Rakhami, M. S.; Sodhro, A. H. (2021). On the security and privacy challenges of virtual assistants. Sensors., 21(7): 1–19 (19 pages).

    Brilakis, I.; Fischer, H.; Pan, Y.; Borrmann, A.; Mayer, H.-G.; Rhein, F.; Vos, C.; Pettinato, E.; Wagner, S. (2019). Built environment digital twinning: Report of the international workshop on built environment digital twinning. Technical University of Munich, Germany: 1–40 (40 pages).

    Burdea, G.; Coiffet, P. (1994). Virtual Reality Technology. John Wiley & Sons: 1–23 (23 pages).

    Caldarola, E. G.; Rinaldi, A. M. (2017). Big data visualization tools: a survey. Research Gate: 1–10 (10 pages).

    Castelnovo, W.; Misuraca, G.; Savoldelli, A. (2016). Smart cities governance: The need for a holistic approach to assessing urban participatory policy making. Social Sci. Comput. Rev., 34(6): 724–739 (16 pages).

    Ceconello, M.; Spallazzo, D. (2008, October). Virtual reality for enhanced urban design. In Proceedings of 5th INTUITION, International Conference Virtual Reality in Industry and Society: From Research to Application. 6-8 Ottobre 2008. Torino: 1–8 (8 pages).

    Checa, D.; Bustillo, A. (2020). A review of immersive virtual reality serious games to enhance learning and training. Multimedia Tools and Applications., 79(9): 5501–5527 (27 pages).

    Clarke, E. (2021). Virtual reality simulation—the future of orthopedic training? A systematic review and narrative analysis. Advances in Simulation., 6: 1–10 (10 pages).

    Connor, D. M. (1988). A new ladder of citizen participation. Nat'l Civic Rev., 77: 248–257 (10 pages).

    Cosgrave, E.; Tryfonas, T.; Crick, T. (2014). The smart city from a public value perspective: 1–10 (10 pages).

    Cruz-Neira, C.; Sandin, D. J.; DeFanti, T. A. (1993). Surround-screen projection-based virtual reality: The design and implementation of the CAVE. In Proceedings of the 20th Annual Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques: 135–142 (8 pages).

    Delgado, J. M. D.; Oyedele, L.; Demian, P.; Beach, T. (2020). A research agenda for augmented and virtual reality in architecture, engineering, and construction. Advanced Engineering Informatics., 45: 1–21 (21 pages).

    Dembski, F.; Wössner, U.; Letzgus, M.; Ruddat, M.; Yamu, C. (2020). Urban digital twins for smart cities and citizens: The case study of Herrenberg, Germany. Sustainability., 12(6): 1–17 (18 pages).

    Deterding, S.; Sicart, M.; Nacke, L.; O'Hara, K.; Dixon, D. (2011). Gamification: Using game-design elements in non-gaming contexts. In CHI'11 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems., 2425–2428 (4 pages).

    Dyer, M.; Corsini, F.; Certomà, C. (2017). Making urban design a public participatory goal: toward evidence-based urbanism. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Urban Design and Planning, 170(4):173–186 (13 pages).

     

    Ehab, A.; Heath, T.;  Burnett, G. (2023, July). Virtual Reality and the Interactive Design of Elevated Public Spaces: Cognitive Experience vs VR Experience. In International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction., 176–184 (9 pages).

    El Araby, M. (2002, February). Possibilities and constraints of using virtual reality in urban design. In Proceedings of the 7Th International CORP Symposium, Vienna, Austria., 457–463 (7 pages).

    Falanga, R. (2020). Participatory design: participatory urban management. In Sustainable Cities and Communities (pp. 449-457). Cham: Springer International Publishing., 449–457 (8 pages).

    Fares, F.; Taha, D. S.; Sayad, Z. T. E. (2018). Achieving public participation in inaccessible areas using virtual reality a case study of Beit Hanoun–Gaza–Palestine. Alexandria Engineering Journal., 57(3): 1821–1828 (8 pages).

    Feeney, M. K.; Welch, E. W. (2012). Electronic participation technologies and perceived outcomes for local government managers. Public Management Review., 14(6): 815–833 (18 pages).

    Fernández, R. P.; Alonso, V. (2015). Virtual Reality in a shipbuilding environment. Advances in Engineering Software., 81: 30–40 (11 pages).

     Fraser, M.; Bjornsson, H. (2004). Real-time digital modeling in design education and practice. Urban Design International., 9: 187–196 (9 pages).

    Gandhi, R. D.; Patel, D. S. (2018). Virtual reality–opportunities and challenges. Virtual Reality., 5(01): 2714–2724 (11 pages).

    García, M.; Eizaguirre, S.; & Pradel, M. (2015). Social innovation and creativity in cities: A socially inclusive governance approach in two peripheral spaces of Barcelona. City, Culture and Society, 6(4), 93-100 (8 pages).

    Getso, M. M. A.; Bakon, K. A. (2017). Virtual reality in education: the future of learning. International Journal of Information System and Engineering., 5(2): 30–39 (10 pages).

    Greenhalgh, T.; Robert, G.; Macfarlane, F.; Bate, P.; Kyriakidou, O. (2004). Diffusion of innovations in service organizations: systematic review and recommendations. The Milbank Quarterly., 82(4): 581–629 (49 pages).

    Halvorsen, K. E. (2003). Assessing the effects of public participation. Public Administration Review., 63(5): 535–543 (9 pages).

    Harris, T.; Weiner, D. (1998). Empowerment, marginalization, and" community-integrated" GIS. CaGIS., 25(2): 67–76 (10 pages).

    Hassan, L.; Hamari, J. (2020). Gameful civic engagement: A review of the literature on gamification of e-participation. Government Information Quarterly., 37(3): 1–21 (22 pages).

    Healey, P. (2020). Collaborative planning: Shaping places in fragmented societies. Bloomsbury Publishing., 1–362 (363 pages).

    Hidayah, N.; Meidiana, C.; Firdausiyah, N.; Ghosh, R. K.; Amalia, R. (2024). STATUS OF THE RURAL COMMUNITY ON THE LADDER OF PUBLIC PARTICIPATION. THE CASE OF WASTE MANAGEMENT PROGRAM IN MOJOSARI VILLAGE, BOJONEGORO. Journal of Environmental Engineering and Sustainable Technology., 11(01): 14–23 (10 pages).

    Hirzle, T. (2023). Digital Eye Strain in Virtual Reality Head-Mounted Displays: Properties, Causes, Solutions, and Perspective (Doctoral dissertation, Universität Ulm)., 1–248 (248 pages).  

    Ismail, A. W.; Sunar, M. S. (2009). Collaborative augmented reality: multi-user interaction in urban simulation., 382–391 (10 pages).

    Jamei, E.; Mortimer, M.; Seyedmahmoudian, M.; Horan, B.; Stojcevski, A. (2017). Investigating the role of virtual reality in planning for sustainable smart cities. Sustainability., 9(11): 1–16 (16 pages).

    Jiang, L.; Masullo, M.; Maffei, L.; Meng, F.; Vorländer, M. (2018). How do shared-street design and traffic restriction improve urban soundscape and human experience?—An online survey with virtual reality. Building and Environment., 143: 318–328 (11 pages).

    Johansen, A. G.; Pedersen, C. B. (2019). Gamified participation: Challenging the current participation methods in urban development with Minecraft. Institute of Architecture & Design, Aalborg University., 1–102 (102 pages).

     

    Kaddoura, S.; Al Husseiny, F. (2023). The rising trend of Metaverse in education: Challenges, opportunities, and ethical considerations: PeerJ Comput. Sci., 9: 1–33 (33 pages).

    Kaimara, P.; Oikonomou, A.; Deliyannis, I. (2022). Could virtual reality applications pose real risks to children and adolescents? A systematic review of ethical issues and concerns. Virtual Reality., 26(2): 697–735 (38 pages).

    Kamińska, D.; Sapiński, T.; Wiak, S.; Tikk, T.; Haamer, R. E.; Avots, E.; Anbarjafari, G. (2019). Virtual reality and its applications in education: Survey. Information., 10(10): 1–20 (20 pages).

    Kaplan, A. D.; Cruit, J.; Endsley, M.; Beers, S. M.; Sawyer, B. D.; Hancock, P. A. (2021). The effects of virtual reality, augmented reality, and mixed reality as training enhancement methods: A meta-analysis. Human factors., 63(4): 706–726 (11 pages).

    Kim, J.; Kim, S. (2019). Finding the optimal D/H ratio for an enclosed urban square: Testing an urban design principle using immersive virtual reality simulation techniques. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health., 16(5): 1–19 (19 pages).

    Kim, Y. M.; Rhiu, I.; Yun, M. H. (2020). A systematic review of a virtual reality system from the perspective of user experience, Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Interact., 36(10): 893–910 (18 pages).

    Kitson, J.; Leiva, M.; Christman, Z.; Dalton, P. (2019). Evaluating urban odor with field olfactometry in Camden, NJ. Int. J. Urban Sci., 3(3): 1–12 (12 pages).

    Korkut, E. H.; Surer, E. (2023). Visualization in virtual reality: a systematic review. Virtual Reality., 27(2): 1447–1480 (34 pages).

    Kulal, S.; Li, Z.; Tian, X. (2022). Security and privacy in virtual reality: A literature review. Issues in Information Systems., 23(2): 185–192 (8 pages).

    Kuna, P.; Hašková, A.; Borza, Ľ. (2023). Creation of virtual reality for education purposes. Sustainability., 15(9): 1–19 (20 pages).

    Lanier, J. (2017). Dawn of the New Everything: Encounters with Reality and Virtual Reality. Henry Holt and Co., 1–350 (351 pages).

    Lele, A. (2013). Virtual reality and its military utility. J. Ambient Intell. Hum. Comput., 4: 17–26 (10 pages).

    Li, H.; Zhang, J.; Xia, L.; Song, W.; Bode, N. W. (2019). Comparing the route-choice behavior of pedestrians around obstacles in a virtual experiment and a field study. Transp. Res. Part C Emerging Technol., 107: 120–136 (17 pages).

    Lippman, A. (1980). Movie-maps: An application of the optical videodisc to computer graphics Proc. ACM Comput. Graphics Comput. Syst., 32–42 (11 pages).

    Lironi, E. (2016). Potential and Challenges of E-participation in the European Union., 1–76 (77 pages).

    Liu, X. (2020). Three-dimensional visualized urban landscape planning and design based on virtual reality technology. IEEE Access., 8: 149510–149521 (12 pages).

     Meenar, M.; Kitson, J. (2020). Using multi-sensory and multi-dimensional immersive virtual reality in participatory planning. Int. J. Urban Sci., 4(3), 34: 1–19 (19 pages).

    Mueller, J.; Lu, H.; Chirkin, A.; Klein, B.; Schmitt, G. (2018). Citizen Design Science: A strategy for crowd-creative urban design. Cities., 72: 181–188 (8 pages).

    Nesti, G. (2020). Partnerships for innovation: The case of the urban living lab in Turin. In C. Van Montfort, & A. Michels (Eds.), Partnerships for livable cities., 317–334 (28 pages).

    Nochta, T.; Wan, L.; Schooling, J. M.; Parlikad, A. K. (2021). A socio-technical perspective on urban analytics: The case of city-scale digital twins. J. Urban Technol., 28(1-2): 263–287 (24 pages).

    Oksman,V.; Väätänen, A.; Ylikauppila, M. (2014). Future Illustrative and Participative Urban Planning Developing Concepts for Co-creation. Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Creative Content Technologies., 22–29 (8 pages).

    Pallavicini, F.; Argenton, L.; Toniazzi, N.; Aceti, L.; Mantovani, F. (2016). Virtual reality applications for stress management training in the military. Aerosp. Med. Hum. Perform., 87(12): 1021–1030 (10 pages).

    Pimentel, D.; Kalyanaraman, S. (2022). The effects of embodying wildlife in virtual reality on conservation behaviors. Sci. Rep., 12(1): 1–18 (19 pages).

     

    Portman, M. E., Natapov, A., & Fisher-Gewirtzman, D. (2015). To go where no man has gone before: Virtual reality in architecture, landscape architecture and environmental planning. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems., 54: 376-384 (9 pages).

    Rheingold, H. (1991). Virtual Reality. Summit Books: 1–415 (416 pages).

    Rogers, S. L.; Broadbent, R.; Brown, J.; Fraser, A.; Speelman, C. P. (2022). Realistic motion avatars are the future for social interaction in virtual reality. Front. Virtual Reality., 2: 1–12 (12 pages).

    Saeed, Z. O.; Mancini, F.; Glusac, T.; Izadpanahi, P. (2022). Future city, digital twinning, and the urban realm: A systematic literature review. Buildings., 12(5): 1–24 (24 pages).

    Sagnier, C.; Loup-Escande, E.; Valléry, G. (2020). Effects of gender and prior experience in immersive user experience with virtual reality. In Advances in Usability and User Experience: Proceedings of the AHFE 2019 International Conferences on Usability & User Experience, and Human Factors and Assistive Technology, July 24-28, 2019, Washington DC, USA 10 (pp. 305-314). Springer International Publishing: 305–314 (9 pages).

    Sarjakoski, T. (1998). Networked GIS for public participation—emphasis on utilizing image data. Computers, Environment, and Urban Systems., 22(4): 381–392 (12 pages).

    Savoldelli, A.; Codagnone, C.; Misuraca, G. (2014). Understanding the e-government paradox: Learning from literature and practice on barriers to adoption. Government Information Quarterly., 31: S63–S71 (9 pages).

    Scerri, K.; Attard, M. (2023). People as planners: Stakeholder participation in the street experimentation process using a virtual urban living lab. J. Urban Mobility., 4: 1–8 (8 pages).

    Schively, C. (2007). A quantitative analysis of consensus building in local environmental review. JPER., 27(1): 82–98 (18 pages).

    Schrom-Feiertag, H.; Stubenschrott, M.; Regal, G., Matyus, T.; Seer, S. (2020, May). An interactive and responsive virtual reality environment for participatory urban planning. In Proceedings of the 11th Annual Symposium on Simulation for Architecture and Urban Design., 1–7 (7 pages).

    Schrotter, G.; Hürzeler, C. (2020). The digital twin of the city of Zurich for urban planning. PFG–Journal of Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Geoinformation Science., 88(1): 99–112 (14 pages).

    Scrivner, O.; Madewell, J.; Buckley, C.; Perez, N. (2019). Best practices in the use of augmented and virtual reality technologies for SLA: Design, implementation, and feedback. Teaching language and teaching literature in virtual environments., 55–72 (18 pages).

    Shahat, E.; Hyun, C. T.; Yeom, C. (2021). City digital twin potentials: A review and research agenda. Sustainability., 13(6): 1–20 (20 pages).

    Shakeri, M. (2017). The use of digital games in participatory planning practices (Master's thesis, The University of Manchester)., 1–209 (209 pages).

    Sherman, W. R.; Craig, A. B. (2003). Understanding Virtual Reality: Interface, Application, and Design. Morgan Kaufmann., 1–903 (903 pages).

    Smith, L.; Lyons, F.; Bridges, B.; & Casey, R. (2022, December). WithFeelVR: the spatial and textural affordances of VR as a mapping strategy for an accessible digital musical instrument. In Proceedings of the International Computer Music Conference 2022: Standing Wave, 124–131 (8 pages).

    Springs, D. (2024). Elements of Smart Leadership Approaches for Smart City Development. Business Ethics and Leadership., 8(2): 35–48 (14 pages).

    Stanberry, B. (2001). Legal ethical and risk issues in telemedicine. Comput. Methods Programs Biomed., 64(3): 225–233 (9 pages).

    Stanney, K.; Fidopiastis, C.; Foster, L. (2020). Virtual reality is sexist: but it does not have to be. Front. Rob. AI., 7: 1–19 (19 pages).

    Stauskis, G. (2014). Development of methods and practices of virtual reality as a tool for participatory urban planning: a case study of Vilnius City as an example for improving environmental, social and energy sustainability. Energy Sustainability Soc., 4: 1–13 (14 pages).

    Stern, E.; Amir, I. (2006). "Benefits of public participation as evaluated by the participating citizens''. In Annual Conference of Israel Planning Association, Hertzelia (in Hebrew)., 1067–1085 (19 pages).

    Stern, E.; Gudes, O.; Svoray, T. (2009). Web-based and traditional public participation in comprehensive planning: a comparative study. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design., 36(6): 1067–1085 (19 pages).

    Sutherland, I. E. (1965). The Ultimate Display. Proceedings of the IFIP Congress., 506–508  (3 pages).

    Thiel, S. K. (2017). Let’s play Urban Planner: the use of game elements in public participation platforms. plaNext–next-generation planning., 4: 58–75 (18 pages).

    1. C.; Reichenbacher, T.; Kiefer, P.; Sailer, C. (2023). An augmented reality study for public participation in urban planning. J. Locat. Based Serv., 17(1): 48–77 (30 pages).

    Van Dessel, A. (2019). The Use of Virtual Reality in Urban Planning: Review paper on the (dis)advantages and a new perspective for future research., 3–8 (6 pages).

    Van Leeuwen, J. P.; Hermans, K.; Jylhä, A.; Quanjer, A. J.; Nijman, H. (2018, November). Effectiveness of virtual reality in participatory urban planning: A case study. In Proceedings of the 4th Media Architecture Biennale Conference., 128–136 (9 pages).

     Wang, Y.; Lin, Y. S. (2023). Public participation in urban design with augmented reality technology based on indicator evaluation— Front. Virtual Reality., 4: 1–18 (18 pages).

    Weil, M. (2014). Community practice: Conceptual models. Routledge: 1–31 (31 pages).

    Weinstock, M. (2013). E-Participation–New opportunities for citizen participation in urban planning projects. Citizen Participation in Project Development (German), Immobilien Manager Verlag, Köln., 1–18 (18 pages).

    Weiner, D.; Harris, T. M.; Craig, W. J. (2002). Community participation and geographic information systems. In Community participation and geographical information systems., 3–16 (14 pages).

    Whyte, J.; Nikolić, D. (2018). Virtual Reality and the Built Environmen., 14–25 (12 pages).

    Wohlgenannt, I.; Simons, A.; Stieglitz, S. (2020). Virtual reality. (BISE)., 62: 455–461 (7 pages).

    Won, M.; Ungu, D. A. K.; Matovu, H.; Treagust, D. F.; Tsai, C. C.; Park, J.; Tasker, R. (2023). Diverse approaches to learning with immersive Virtual Reality identified from a systematic review. Comput. Educ., 195: 1–24 (24 pages).

    Wu, B.; Yu, X.; Gu, X. (2020). Effectiveness of immersive virtual reality using head‐mounted displays on learning performance: A meta‐analysis. J. Educ. Technol. Syst., 51(6): 1991–2005 (15 pages).

    Xiang, R. (2024). Enhancing Democratic Governance: The Crucial Role of Broad Public Participation in Government Public Consultations. International Journal of Education and Humanities., 13(3): 254–256 (3 pages).

    Xu, S. (2021). Three‐Dimensional Visualization Algorithm Simulation of Construction Management Based on GIS and VR Technology. J. Complexity., 2021(1) : 1–13 (13 pages).

    Yamu, C.; Poplin, A.; Devisch, O.; De Roo, G. (2017). The virtual and the real in planning and urban design: perspectives, practices and applications. Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group., 1–279 (280 pages).

  • Receive Date 10 August 2024
  • Revise Date 28 October 2024
  • Accept Date 03 December 2024