International Journal of Human Capital in Urban Management
Quarterly Publication

Exploring the dynamics of human resources apology in organizational communication

https://doi.org/10.22034/IJHCUM.2025.01.10
Volume 10, Issue 1 - Serial Number 37
Winter 2025
Pages 149-162
International Journal of Human Capital in Urban Management

Document Type : ORIGINAL RESEARCH ARTICLE

Authors

A. R. Rajabipoor Meybodi
M. Sabokro
A. Solhjoo
E. Hosseini
F. Forghani Elahabadi

Department of Business Administration, Faculty of Economics, Management & Accounting, Yazd University, Yazd, Iran.

Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The emotional expression of feelings and the satisfaction of social needs are two primary purposes of many communication interactions in an organization. As a universal aspect of human interaction, the apology has sparked great interest in its study across a wide range of disciplines. However, the human resources apology has not been involved integrally in the context of organizational communication. Therefore, the research question is, what are the dynamics of human resources apology in organizational communication in Iran?
METHODS: This was a qualitative study conducted using grounded theory. The research was conducted, and sampling was theoretical in municipalities in Iran. For data collection, semi-structured in-depth interviews with the 5W1H technique were conducted with 13 managers, who respond to citizens’ requests in the central building of municipalities in Iranian provinces. The researched community comprises human resource managers with at least five years of beneficial work experience in the municipality and relevant knowledge of apology. Targeted sampling has been done based on the researcher’s considerations.                                                         
FINDINGS: The analysis of the interviews resulted in a set of fundamental topics collected during the open coding process. Sixteen categories were extracted from these fundamental topics. Then, in the axial coding stage, the link between these categories was determined under the following headings causal conditions, core category, contextual conditions, intervening conditions, strategies, and consequences of human resources apology in the form of an axial coding paradigm. In the present study, data analysis was performed using ATLAS. ti software version 8 in three stages of primary, central, and selective coding, which resulted in the identification of 5 categories, 15 central concepts, and 126 final codes.
CONCLUSION: The developed process model provides a comprehensive understanding of the human resources apology process in municipalities in Iran. The study highlights the importance of conflict management, individual behavior, motivation, audience strength, acceptability, apology graph, apology method, audience identity, communication quality, patience, and incompatibility in the human resources apology process.
 

Keywords

Apology
Conflict management
Grounded Theory
Organizational communication
Subjects

OPEN ACCESS

©2024 The author(s). This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third-party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit: 

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ 

PUBLISHER NOTE
Tehran Urban Research & Planning Centre (TURPC) takes a neutral position about claims on disputed territories, place names, international boundaries, jurisdiction in published maps, and institutional affiliations. TURPC is committed to retracting a paper after its publication if it becomes apparent that there are serious problems in its content, in terms of research and publication ethics (https://www.ijhcum.net/journal/process?ethics).

CITATION METRICS & CAPTURES

Google Scholar | DOAJ | Scopus | EBSCO | Internet Archive |Twitter |Mendeley  

CURRENT PUBLISHER

 Tehran Urban Research and Planning Center: Tehran Municipality

Agba, M. S., (2018). Interpersonal relationships and organizational performance: the Nigerian public sector in perspective. Indian. J. Commerce. Manage. Stud., 9(3): 78-86 (9 pages).
Allan, A.; McKillop, D.; Dooley, J.; Allan, M. M.; Preece, D. A., (2015). Apologies following an adverse medical event: The importance of focusing on the consumer's needs. Patient. Educ.  Couns., 98(9): 1058-1062 (5 pages).
 Ambituuni, A.; Ejiogu, C.; Ejiogu, A.; Omar, M., (2024). Operational dilemmas in safety-critical industries: the tension between organizational reputational concerns and the effective communication of risk. J. Manage. Organ., 30(2): 269-286 (18 pages).
Andrews, H.; Tierney, S.; Seers, K., (2020). Needing permission: The experience of self-care and self-compassion in nursing: A constructivist grounded theory study. Inter.  J. Nurs. Stud., 101(2020): 103436.
Arabiun, A.; Tajpour, M.; Zahedi, M. R., (2024). The effect of digital leadership on the performance of businesses: the mediating role of organizational entrepreneurship. Int. J. Hum. Capital. Urban .Manage., 9(1): 17-28 (12 pages).
Barbour, J. B.; Jensen, J. T.; Call, S. R., (2024). Organizational communication design. Organizational Communication Theory and Research, 8: 107.
Battistella, E. L., (2014). Sorry about that: The language of public apology. Oxford University Press, USA.
Benoit, W. L. (2024). Accounts, excuses, and apologies: Image repair theory extended. State University of New York Press, Albany.
Bentley, J. M., (2018). What counts as an apology? Exploring stakeholder perceptions in a hypothetical organizational crisis. Manage. Commun. Q., 32(2): 202-232 (31 pages).
Bippus, A. M.; Young, S. L., (2020). How to say “I’m Sorry:” Ideal apology elements for common interpersonal transgressions. West. J. Commun., 84(1): 43-57 (15 pages).
Boyer, A. R., (2009). In a" Sorry" State: The Ethics of Institutional Apologies in Response to Medical Error (Doctoral dissertation, University of Pittsburgh).
Chaudhry, S. J.; Burdea, V., (2023). I’m sorry if you are: The risk of apologizing first and other unique dynamics in resolving two-sided conflicts.
 Chavez, J. V.; Cuilan, J. T.; Adalia, H. G., (2024). Message patterns through discourse analysis on the concept of apology and forgiveness during Ramadan among college students practicing Islam. Environ. Social. Psychol., 9(3): 1-13 (13 pages).
Cheung, S. O.; Zhu, L.; Tong, S. Y., (2019). How apology incentivizes construction dispute settlement. J. Leg. Aff. Dispute Resolut. Eng. Constr., 11(2): 04519002 (1 page).
Corbin, J.; Strauss, A., (2008). Qualitative research. Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory, third edition, London, sage publications.
Creswell, J. W.; Poth, C. N., (2016). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. second edition, London, Sage publications.
Creswell, J. W.; Tashakkori, A., (2007). Differing perspectives on mixed methods research. In (Vol. 1, pp. 303-308), Los Angeles, Sage publications.
Cloutier, C.; Langley, A., (2020). What makes a process theoretical contribution?. Org. Theory, 1(1): 2631787720902473 (1 pages).
Dalal, A. K.; Priya, K. R., (2016). Introduction to qualitative research. In Qualitative Research on Illness, Wellbeing and Self-Growth (pp. 15-36). Routledge India.  
Emeka-Okoli, S.; Otonnah, C. A.; Nwankwo, T. C.; Nwankwo, E. E., (2024). Internal and external communication in oil & gas for enhancing CSR implementation: A review. World. J. Advanced. Res. Rev., 21(3), 109-118 (10 pages).
Enwereji, P. C.; Uwizeyimana, D., (2020). Municipal consumer debt in South African municipalities: Contexts. causes. realities. Res. World. Eco., 11(3): 333-345 (13 pages).
Exline, J. J.; Deshea, L.; Holeman, V. T., (2007). Is apology worth the risk? Predictors, outcomes, and ways to avoid regret. J. Social. Clinical. Psychol., 26(4): 479-504 (26 pages).
Fang, Y., (2019). The Red Yellow Blue Event: How the timing of an apology affects the effectiveness of it. In 2019 5th International Conference on Humanities and Social Science Research (ICHSSR 2019) (pp. 311-316).France, Atlantis Press.
Fehr, R.; Gelfand, M. J., (2010). When apologies work: How matching apology components to victims’ self-construals facilitates forgiveness. Organ. behav. hum. Decis. Process., 113(1): 37-50 (14 pages).
Fehr, R.; Gelfand, M. J.; Nag, M., (2010). The road to forgiveness: a meta-analytic synthesis of its situational and dispositional correlates. Psychol. Bull., 136(5): 894–914 (21 pages).
Frandsen, S.; Grant, J.; Kärreman, D., (2024). Working with pride in the shadow of shame: Emotional dissonance and identity work during a corporate scandal. Hum. Relation., 1-29 (29 pages).
Gillespie, G. L.; Berry, P., (2023). Qualitative analysis of workplace assault outcomes from the perspectives of emergency nurses. J. Emerg. Nurs., 49(3): 450-460 (11 pages).
Glaser, B.; Strauss, A., (2017). Discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. 1st Edition. New York. Routledge.
Glikson, E.; Asscher, O., (2023). AI-mediated apology in a multilingual work context: Implications for perceived authenticity and willingness to forgive. Comput. Hum. Behav., 140 (2023): 107592 (1 page).
Gkinopoulos, T. (2022). Victim-focused political apology predicts political support via perceived sincerity, trust and positive emotional climate: The case of the 2018 bushfire in Attica. J. Social. Political Psychol., 10(2): 475-490 (16 pages)
Hennink, M.; Hutter, I.; Bailey, A., (2020). Qualitative research methods. Sage.
Hosseini, E.; Rajabipoor Meybodi, A., (2023). Proposing a Model for Sustainable Development of Creative Industries Based on Digital Transformation. Sustainability., 15 (14): 11451 (1 pages).
Hosseini, E.; Saeida Ardekani, S.; Sabokro, M.; Salamzadeh, A., (2022). The study of knowledge employee voice among the knowledge-based companies: the case of an emerging economy. Revista de Gestão., 29(2): 117-138  (22 pages).
Hosseini, E.; Tajpour, M.; Lashkarbooluki, M., (2020). The impact of entrepreneurial skills on manager's job performance. Int. J. Hum. Capital Urban Manage., 5(4): 361-372 (12 pages).
 
Imada, H.; Yamamoto, A.; Tsudaka, G., (2023). An Apology With a Tiny Monetary Compensation Is No More Effective Than a Verbal Apology Alone. Lett. Evol. Behav. Sci., 14(1): 32-36 (5 pages).
Kilag, O. K., Largo, J., Rabillas, A., Kilag, F., Angtud, M. K., Book, J. F., & Sasan, J. M. (2024). Administrators’ Conflict Management and Strategies. Inter. Multi. J. Res. Innovation. Sustainability. Excellence., 1(1): 60-67 (8 pages).
Lazare, A., (2005). On apology. 1st edition, California , Oxford University Press.
Langley, A.; Meziani, N., (2020). Making interviews meaningful.  J. Applied. Behav. Sci., 56(3): 370-391 (21 pages).
Lee, Y.; Tao, W., (2020). Employees as information influencers of organization’s CSR practices: The impacts of employee words on public perceptions of CSR. Public. Relat. Rev., 46(1): 101887 (1 page).
Liao, H., (2007). Do it right this time: The role of employee service recovery performance in customer-perceived justice and customer loyalty after service failures. J. Appl. Psychol., 92(2): 475–489 (15 pages).
Maykut, P.; Morehouse, R., (2002). Beginning qualitative research: A philosophical and practical guide. 1st edition, London, Routledge.
McCullough, M. E.; Worthington Jr, E. L.; Rachal, K. C., (1997). Interpersonal forgiving in close relationships. J. Personality. Asocial. Psychol., 73(2): 321–336 (16 pages).
Mifune, N.; Inamasu, K.; Kohama, S.; Ohtsubo, Y.; Tago, A., (2019). Social dominance orientation as an obstacle to intergroup apology. Plos One., 14(1): 0211379 (1 page).
Minei, E. M., (2022). An Apology Comparison: A Case Study of Two Different Discursive Leadership Approaches. 1st edition, United States , SAGE Publications: SAGE Business Cases Originals.
Morrison, R. L., (2008). Negative relationships in the workplace: Associations with organisational commitment, cohesion, job satisfaction and intention to turnover. J. Manage. Organ., 14(4): 330-344 (15 pages).
Myers, G. E.; Myers, M. T., (1988). The dynamics of human communication: A laboratory approach. 4th edition, United States, McGraw-Hill.
Nosratirad, E., (2023). The Effects of Sex and Culture on the Apology Performance of Native English Speakers and Learners. 1st edition, Germany, Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Nwinyokpugi, P. N.; Omunakwe, P. O., (2019). Interpersonal relationship at work; enhancing organizational productivity of deposit money banks in Port Harcourt. J. Res. Bus. Manage., 7(1): 22-33 (12 pages).
Palalic, R., (2017). The phenomenon of entrepreneurial leadership in gazelles and mice: A qualitative study from Bosnia and Herzegovina. World. Rev. Entrepreneurship. Manage. Sustainable. Dev., 13(2-3): 211-236 (26 pages).
Qin, Y. S.; Men, L. R., (2023). Exploring the impact of internal communication on employee psychological well-being during the COVID-19 pandemic: The mediating role of employee organizational trust. Int. J. Bus. Commun., 60(4): 1197-1219 (22 pages).
Rajabipoor Meybodi, A. R.; Jahanfekr, A.; Mahjoor, H.; Hosseini, E., (2024). Identifying the dimensions of employee experience according to the effect of satisfaction, work place and organizational culture. Int. J. Hum. Capital Urban Manage., 9(1): 85-100 (15 pages).
Risen, J. L.; Gilovich, T., (2007). Target and observer differences in the acceptance of questionable apologies. J. Personality. Social. Psychol., 92(3): 418–433 (16 pages).
Robertson, N.; Rotman, J.; McQuilken, L.; Ringer, A., (2023). The customer is often wrong: Investigating the influence of customer failures and apologies on frontline service employee well‐being. Psychol. Mark., 40(4): 825-844 (20 pages).
Scher, S. J.; Darley, J. M., (1997). How effective are the things people say to apologize? Effects of the realization of the apology speech act. J. Psycholinguistic. Res., 26(1997): 127-140 (14 pages).
Seiter, J. S.; Curran, T.; Elwood, R. E., (2023). Make no apologies: fear of negative evaluation, depressive symptoms, and the mediating role of accounting for CoViD-safe behavior amongst people at high-risk for severe illness. Health. Commun., 39(5): 1-10 (10 pages).
 
Shafa, S.; Harinck, F.; Ellemers, N., (2017). Sorry seems to be the hardest word: Cultural differences in apologizing effectively. J. Appl. Social. Psychol., 47(10): 553-567 (15 pages).
Skarlicki, D. P.; Folger, R.; Gee, J., (2004). When social accounts backfire: The exacerbating effects of a polite message or an apology on reactions to an unfair outcome 1. J. Appl. Social. Psychol., 34(2): 322-341 (20 pages).
Smith, N., (2008). I was wrong: The meanings of apologies. 1st edition, New York, Cambridge University Press.
Tajpour, M.; Salamzadeh, A.; Ramadani, V.; Palalić, R.; Hosseini, E., (2022). Knowledge sharing and achieving competitive advantage in international environments: The case of Iranian digital start-ups. In International Entrepreneurship in Emerging Markets (pp. 206-224). 1st edition, New York, Routledge.
Thompson, S., (2019). Hate speech and self-restraint. Ethical theory and moral practice, 22 (2019): 657-671 (15 pages).
Utikal, V.; Fischbacher, U., (2013). Disadvantageous lies in individual decisions. J. Econ. Behav. Organ., 85 (2013): 108-111 (4 pages).
Velmurugan, C., (2016). Interpersonal relationship and organizational effectiveness. Inter. J. Bus. Manage. Leadersh., 7(1): 1-5 (5 pages).
Wang, K.-Y.; Chih, W.-H.; Honora, A., (2023). How the emoji use in apology messages influences customers’ responses in online service recoveries: The moderating role of communication style. Inter. J. Inf. Manage., 69 (2023): 102618 (1 page).
Wooten, D. B., (2009). Say the right thing: Apologies, reputability, and punishment. J. Consum. Psychol, 19(2): 225-235 (11 pages).
Zammit Y. G., (2023). Apologies: a necessary soft skill or something to avoid? Minima Medica, 39-46  (8 pages).
  • Receive Date 08 April 2024
  • Revise Date 28 June 2024
  • Accept Date 23 July 2024

Home

Authorship

Submit Manuscript

Indexing and Abstracting

Editorial Board

Unrestricted Reuse in Compliance with BOAI

Open Access Policy

Self-Archiving Policy

Privacy Statement

Publisher Business Model

Publisher and Sponsor

Contact Us