International Journal of Human Capital in Urban Management
Quarterly Publication

The social responsibility of dual education in an unstable environment

https://doi.org/10.22034/IJHCUM.2023.03.01
Volume 8, Issue 3 - Serial Number 31
Summer 2023
Pages 303-316
International Journal of Human Capital in Urban Management

Document Type : ORIGINAL RESEARCH ARTICLE

Authors

O. Kolodiziev 1
V. Shcherbak 2
M. Krupka 3
V.r Kovalenko 3
T. Kolodizieva 3
V. Yatsenko 4

1 Department of Customs and Financial Services, Simon Kuznets Kharkiv National University of Economics, Kharkiv, Ukraine

2 Department of Entrepreneurship and Business, Kyiv National University of Technologies and Design, Kyiv, Ukraine

3 Department of Finance, Money Circulation and Credit, Ivan Franko National University of Lviv, Lviv, Ukraine

4 Municipal establishment "Kharkiv Humanitarian-Pedagogical Academy" of the Kharkiv regional council, Kharkiv, Ukraine

Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: In a context of instability caused by various crises, including military crises, the higher education system is at great risk. Practice-oriented (dual) education is one of the most effective ways to address this problem. The innovation of this study is that for the first time a theoretical and practical model for involving all stakeholders in this process has been created and tested. The aim of the article is to substantiate a socially responsible dual education system in an unstable environment.
METHODS: In terms of objective, this is an applied and quantitative study. The study population is estimated at 13 universities, 10 companies, 50 students between November 2021 and November 2022. The sample size is estimated using the Cochrane formula. A standard 5-point Likert scale questionnaire was used to collect data, where groups of questions corresponded to 4 hypotheses. All data were investigated by factor and cluster analysis using STATISTICA software (version 10.0).
FINDINGS: All four hypotheses were confirmed. Before the war, the first and second hypotheses were prioritized. According to them, the process approach of social responsibility of dual education allows designing and launching a system of social responsibility of dual education and creating a talent pool at the employing enterprise. After the outbreak of hostilities, the priorities changed. The third and fourth hypotheses allow, through the organization of supportive (enabling) processes, to ensure the effective functioning of the system. As a result, the majority of stakeholders (31%) consider it necessary to modernize the mentoring system and provide graduates with relevant professional skills, while methodological and career guidance came in second and third (16% and 13% respectively).
CONCLUSION: Using the theoretical and practical model of formation and implementation of dual education in the unstable conditions of Ukraine will help to solve the problems of the country out of crisis, post-war recovery of higher education system, to bring the requirements of production with the possibilities of training specialists in universities and can be applied in other countries in a similar situation.

Graphical Abstract

The social responsibility of dual education in an unstable environment

Keywords

Factor analysis
Mentoring
Practice-oriented learning
Stakeholders
Subjects
Ante, G.; Ken, K., (2014). The effects of perceived corporate social responsibility on employee attitudes. Bus. Ethics Q., 24(2): 165-202 (38 pages).
Baethge, M.; Wolter, A., (2015). The German skill formation model in transition: from dual system of VET to higher education? J. Lab. Mark. Res., 48 (2): 97–112 (16 pages).
Baumann-Pauly, D.; Wickert, C.; Spence, L.J.; Scherer, A.G., (2013). Organizing corporate social responsibility in small and large firms: Size matters. J. Bus. Ethics, 115(4): 693-705 (30 pages).
Beaudoin, M., (2016). Issues in education: a primer for higher education decision makers. New Direct. High. Educ., 173: 9-19 (11 pages).
Beerkens, M.; Mägi, E.; Lill, L., (2011). University studies as a side job. Causes and consequences of massive student employment in Estonia. High. Educ., 61(6): 679–692 (14 pages).
Boer, N.I.; Berends, H.; Van Baalen, P., (2011). Relational models for knowledge sharing behavior. Eur. Manage. J., 29(2): 85-97 (13 pages).
Campbell, T.A., (2018). A phenomenological study of business graduates’ employment experiences in the changing economy. J. Lab. Mark. Res., 52(4): 1-10 (10 pages).
Cedefop, (2015). Policy handbook: Access to and participation in continuous vocational education and training (CVET) in Europe. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. Cedefop working paper, 25 (120 pages).
Chennamaneni, A. ; Teng, J.T.; Raja, M.K. (2012). A unified model of knowledge sharing behaviors: theoretical development and empirical test. Behav. Inf. Technol. BE., 31(11): 1097-1115 (19 pages).
Chin, C.P.Y.; Evans, N.; Choo, K.K.R., (2015). Exploring factors influencing the use of enterprise social networks in multinational professional service firms. J. Organ. Comput. Electron., 25(3): 289-315 (27 pages).
Chuang, S.H., (2004). A resource-based perspective on knowledge management capability and competitive advantage: an empirical investigation. Expert Syst. Appl., 27(3): 459-465 (7 pages).
Cohen, J., (1988). Set correlation and contingency tables. Appl. Psychol. Meas., 425-434 (10 pages).
Delmas, M.; Blass, V., (2010). Measuring corporate environmental performance: the trade‐offs of sustainability ratings. Bus. Strateg. Environ., 19(4): 245-260 (16 pages).
Di Paolo, A.; Matano, A., (2016). The impact of working while studying on the academic and labour market performance of graduates: The joint role of work intensity and job-field match. (30 pages).
Donald, W.E.; Melanie, J.A.; Baruch, Y., (2018). Students’ perceptions of education and employability: facilitating career transition from higher education into the labor market. Career Dev. Int., 23(5): 513–540 (29 pages).
Donia, Ma B.L.; Tetrault Sirsly, Carol-Ann., (2016). Determinants and consequences of employee attributions of corporate social responsibility as substantive or symbolic. Eur. Manage. J., 34(3):232-242 (11 pages).
Gangi, F.; Mustilli, M.; Varrone, N.; Daniele, L., (2018). Corporate social responsibility and banks’ financial performance. Int. Bus. Res., 11(10): 42-58 (17 pages).
Geel, R.; Backes-Gellner, U., (2012). Earning while learning. When and how student employment is beneficial. Labo., 26(3): 313–340 (30 pages).
Göhringer, A., (2002). University of cooperative education – Karlsruhe: the dual system of higher education in Germany. Asia-Pac. J. Cooper. Educ., 3(2): 53–58 (6 pages).
Groza, M.; Pronschinske, M.; Walker, M., (2011). Perceived organizational motives and consumer responses to proactive and reactive CSR. J. Bu. Ethics., 102(4):639-652 (15 pages).
Hąbek, P.; Wolniak, R., (2016). Assessing the quality of corporate social responsibility reports: the case of reporting practices in selected European Union member states. Qual. Quant., 50: 399-420 (22 pages).
Hair Jr, J.F. ; Sarstedt, M.; Hopkins, L.; Kuppelwieser, V.G., (2014). Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM): An emerging tool in business research. Eur. Bus. Rev., 107-122 (16 pages).
Hansen, S.; Dunford, B.; Boss, A.; Boss, R.; Angermeier, I., (2011). Corporate social responsibility and the benefits of employee trust: a cross-disciplinary perspective. J. Bus. Ethics, 102(1): 29-45 (17 pages).
Hong, D.; Suh, E.; Koo, C., (2011). Developing strategies for overcoming barriers to knowledge sharing based on conversational knowledge management: A case study of a financial company. Expert Syst. Appl., 38(12): 14417-14427 (11 pages).
Huerta, E.; Salter, S.B.; Lewis, P.A.; Yeow, P., (2012). Motivating employees to share their failures in knowledge management systems: Anonymity and culture. J. Inf. Syst., 26(2): 93-117 (25 pages).
Islam, M.; Wu, D.; Usman, M.; Nazir, M., (2021). The impact of ceo's personal characteristics on corporate social responsibility: evidence from Bangladesh. Indep. J. Manage. Prod., 12(1): 032–053 (22 pages).
Juanatey, A. G.; Jordana, J.; Durán, I.P.; Royo, D.S., (2021). Independence, accountability and responsibilities of quality assurance agencies in higher education: European and Latin American countries compared. Eur. J. High. Educ., 11(2): 175-196 (22 pages).
Javernick-Will, A., (2012). Motivating knowledge sharing in engineering and construction organizations: power of social motivations. J. Manage. Eng., 28(2): 193-202 (10 pages).
Kabir, R.; Thai, H., (2017). Does corporate governance shape the relationship between corporate social responsibility and financial performance? Pac. Acc. Rev., 29(2): 227-258 (32 pages).
Khosro, J.; Gaye, A., (2009). Marketing communications and corporate social responsibility (CSR): marriage of convenience or shotgun wedding? J. Bus. Ethics, 88(1):103-113 (11 pages).
Kocsis, Z.; Pusztai, G., (2021). A double road to success? Impact of dual education on effectiveness. Res. Post-Compuls. Educ., 26(2): 164-188 (27 pages).
Kolodiziev, O.; Gontar, D., (2014). Scenario modeling of the Bank's Market value strategic management. Economic Annals-XXI, 9-10, 19-23 (5 pages).  
Kuratko, D.F., (2005). The emergence of entrepreneurship education: development, trends, and challenges. Entrepreneurship Theory Pract., 29(5): 577-597 (21 pages).
Powell, T.H.; Kouropalatis, Y.; Morgan, R.E.; Karhu, P., (2016). Mapping knowledge and innovation research themes: Using bibliometric for classification, evolution, proliferation and determinism. Int. J. Entrepreneurship Innov., 20(3-4): 174-199 (26 pages).
Šajeva, S., (2014). Encouraging knowledge sharing among employees: how reward matters. Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci., 156: 130-134 (5 pages).
Selcuk, E., (2019). Corporate social responsibility and financial performance: The moderating role of ownership concentration in Turkey. Sustainability, 11(13): 1-10 (10 pages).
Shcherbak, V.; Nifatova, О.; Kuzheliev, M.; Erkes, O.; Mylashko, O., (2019). The assessment of corporate social responsibility at Ukrainian banks. Banks Bank Syst., 14(3): 140-151 (12 pages).
Stevens, M.; Shibanova, E., (2021). Varieties of state commitment to higher education since 1945: toward a comparative-historical social science of postsecondary expansion. Eur. J. High. Educ., 11(3): 219-238 (20 pages).
Strike, V.; Gao, J.; Bansal, P., (2006). Being good while being bad: social responsibility and the international diversification of US firms. J. Int. Bus. Stud., 37(6): 850-862 (13 pages).
Ukraine. Internal Displacement Report. General Population Survey Round 4, (2022). IMO.
Ukraine: Civilian casualty update, (2022). OHCHR: 1-2 (2 pages).
Urbanek, P., (2020). Reform of the higher education system in Poland from the perspective of agency theory. Eur. J. High. Educ., 10(2): 130-146 (17 pages).
Vnukova, N.; Kavun, S.; Kolodiziev, O.; Achkasova, S.; Gontar, D., (2020). Indicators-markers for assessment of probability of insurance companies relatedness in implementation of risk-oriented approach. Economic Stud., 32(1), 151-173 (23 pages).
World Migration Report (2022). IMO. 2022.
Yehorycheva, S., Kolodiziev, O., Prasolova, S., (2017). Actual Problems of the Ukraine’s Banking System Capital Stability Management. Banks and Bank Systems, 12(2):60-67 (8 pages).  
  • Receive Date 07 November 2022
  • Revise Date 11 January 2023
  • Accept Date 04 March 2023

Home

Authorship

Submit Manuscript

Indexing and Abstracting

Editorial Board

Unrestricted Reuse in Compliance with BOAI

Open Access Policy

Self-Archiving Policy

Privacy Statement

Publisher Business Model

Publisher and Sponsor

Contact Us