International Journal of Human Capital in Urban Management
Quarterly Publication

Energy risk management in urban projects management

Document Type : ORIGINAL RESEARCH ARTICLE

Authors

F. Nazarova 1
T. Voropayeva 2
N. Horobets 3
O. Sokolova 4

1 Department of Management and Marketing, Tashkent Financial Institute, Uzbekistan

2 Faculty of Philosophy, Center for Ukrainian Studies, Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, Ukraine

3 Sumy State University, Academic and Research Institute of Law, Ukraine

4 Department of Economics, Entrepreneurship and Economics Security, State Тax University, Irpin, Ukraine

https://doi.org/10.22034/IJHCUM.2023.02.01
Abstract
global and significantly affect (negatively, positively) the state and development of the national and world economy. The purpose of the paper is the formation of methodical-practical foundations of energy risk management in the energy sector.
METHODS: The matrix method was used in building the energy security risk assessment matrix. Economic-mathematical modeling was used. Depending on the characteristics of the dynamic series and the available information, the methods of analytical alignment, smoothing using the moving average, the average absolute increase, and the average coefficient of change were applied.
FINDINGS: The energy security risk assessment matrix was created. The development of a strategy for the behavior of subjects of market relations in the electricity market should be based not only on the results of risk identification and assessment and the developed risk management plan, but also on the risk response plan and the method of their control (monitoring). The coefficient of use of the installed energy capacity was in the range of 32–26% in Poland in 2021. Calculations of average annual growth rates for each of the dynamic series give reason to state that the highest growth rates of dependence on energy imports were characteristic of coal (+4.17%) and the lowest ones — of oil (+0.35%) during 1990–2021. Considering the forecast values for 2030, a certain decrease in the growth rate of dependence on the import of energy resources (for coal and oil) and an increase- for gas are expected.
CONCLUSION: As a conclusion, the method of forecasting the total final energy consumption of the country was improved for forecasting the amount of energy resources in order to use it for building an energy policy that considers such variables as the economic situation and the political situation in the country. The formation of a risk response plan should be based on management plans and documentation of risk manifestations, intellectual and organizational assets of the economic entity (generalized risk management experience, management strategies, templates, etc.).
 manifestations, intellectual and organizational assets of the economic entity (generalized risk management experience, management strategies, templates, etc.).

Graphical Abstract

Energy risk management in urban projects management

Keywords

Diversification
Energy risk
Energy dependent country
Energy supply
Innovative project
Subjects

OPEN ACCESS

©2023 The author(s). This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third-party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit: 

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ 

PUBLISHER NOTE

IJHCUM Publisher remains neutral concerning jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. 

CITATION METRICS & CAPTURES

| Google Scholar | DOAJ | SCOPUS | EBSCO | Internet Archive | Twitter | Mendeley | 

CURRENT PUBLISHER

Tehran Municipality: Tehran Urban Research and Planning Center

Agustia, D.; Muhammad, N.P.A.; Permatasari, Y., (2020). Earnings management, business strategy, and bankruptcy risk: evidence from Indonesia. Heliyon, 6(2): 03317.
Algieri, B.; Leccadito, A., (2017). Assessing contagion risk from energy and non-energy commodity markets. Energy Econ., 62: 312-322 (11 pages).  
Atanga, R.A., (2020). The role of local community leaders in flood disaster risk management strategy making in Accra. Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduce, 43: 101358.
Bielski, S.; Marks-Bielska, R.; Zielińska-Chmielewska, A.; Romaneckas, K.; Šarauskis, E., (2021). Importance of agriculture in creating energy security-a case study of Poland. Energies, 14(9): 2465 (21 pages).
Cai, W.; Lai, K.H.; Liu, C.; Wei, F.; Ma, M.; Jia, S.; Lv, L., (2019). Promoting sustainability of manufacturing industry through the lean energy-saving and emission-reduction strategy. Sci. Total Environ., 665: 23-32 (10 pages).  
Campisi, D.; Gitto, S.; Morea, D., (2018). Economic feasibility of energy efficiency improvements in street lighting systems in Rome. J. Cleaner Prod., 175: 190-198 (9 pages).
Cergibozan, R., (2022). Renewable energy sources as a solution for energy security risk: Empirical evidence from OECD countries. Renewable Energy, 183: 617-626 (10 pages).
Child, M.; Koskinen, O.; Linnanen, L.; Breyer, C., (2018). Sustainability guardrails for energy scenarios of the global energy transition. Renewable Sustain. Energy Rev., 91: 321-334 (14 pages).
Chowdhury, J.I.; Hu, Y.; Haltas, I.; Balta-Ozkan, N.; Varga, L., (2018). Reducing industrial energy demand in the UK: A review of energy efficiency technologies and energy saving potential in selected sectors. Renewable Sustain. Energy Rev., 94: 1153-1178 (26 pages).
Croutzet, A.; Dabbous, A., (2021). Do FinTech trigger renewable energy use? Evidence from OECD countries. Renewable Energy, 179: 1608-1617 (10 pages).
De Amorim, W.S.; Valduga, I.B.; Ribeiro, J.M.P.; Williamson, V.G.; Krauser, G.E.; Magtoto, M.K.; de Andrade, J.B.S.O., (2018). The nexus between water, energy, and food in the context of the global risks: An analysis of the interactions between food, water, and energy security. Environ. Impact Assess. Rev., 72: 1-11 (11 pages).
Deller, D., (2018). Energy affordability in the EU: The risks of metric driven policies. Energy Policy, 119: 168-182 (15 pages).
Duan, F.; Ji, Q.; Liu, B.Y.; Fan, Y., (2018). Energy investment risk assessment for nations along China’s Belt & Road Initiative. J. Cleaner Prod., 170: 535-547 (13 pages).
EEII, (2020). European Energy Industry Investments.
Fera, M.; Macchiaroli, R.; Fruggiero, F.; Lambiase, A., (2017). Risks prioritization in decision making for wind energy investments using Analytic Network Process (ANP). Int. J. Appl. Eng. Res., 12: 2567-2574 (8 pages).
Gallagher, K.P.; Kamal, R.; Jin, J.; Chen, Y.; Ma, X., (2018). Energizing development finance? The benefits and risks of China's development finance in the global energy sector. Energy policy, 122: 313-321 (9 pages).
Garschagen, M.; Surtiari, G.A.K.; Harb, M., (2018). Is Jakarta’s new flood risk reduction strategy transformational? Sustainability, 10(8): 2934.
Healy, N.; Barry, J., (2017). Politicizing energy justice and energy system transitions: Fossil fuel divestment and a “just transition”. Energy Policy, 108: 451-459 (9 pages).
Ho, S.S.; Chuah, A.S., (2021). Why support nuclear energy? The roles of citizen knowledge, trust, media use, and perceptions across five Southeast Asian countries. Energy Res. Social Sci., 79: 102155.
Ho, S.S.; Oshita, T.; Looi, J.; Leong, A.D.; Chuah, A.S., (2019). Exploring public perceptions of benefits and risks, trust, and acceptance of nuclear energy in Thailand and Vietnam: A qualitative approach. Energy policy, 127: 259-268 (10 pages).
Hu, H.; Xie, N.; Fang, D.; Zhang, X., (2018). The role of renewable energy consumption and commercial services trade in carbon dioxide reduction: Evidence from 25 developing countries. Appl. Energy, 211: 1229-1244 (16 pages).
Jacobson, M.Z.; Delucchi, M.A.; Bauer, Z.A.; Goodman, S.C.; Chapman, W.E.; Cameron, M.A.; Bozonnat, C.; Chobadi, L.; Clonts, H.A.; Enevoldsen, P.; Erwin, J.R.; Yachanin, A.S., (2017). 100% clean and renewable wind, water, and sunlight all-sector energy roadmaps for 139 countries of the world. Joule, 1(1): 108-121 (24 pages).
Jenkins, K.E.; Taebi, B., (2019). Multinational energy justice for managing multinational risks: A case study of nuclear waste repositories. Risk, Hazards & Crisis in Publ. Policy, 10(2): 176-196 (21 pages).
Kim, J.J., (2017). Economic analysis on energy saving technologies for complex manufacturing building. Resour. Conserv. Recycl., 123: 249-254 (6 pages).
Krane, J., (2017). Climate change and fossil fuel: An examination of risks for the energy industry and producer states. MRS Energy Sustainability, 4: 1-16 (16 pages).
Krishnan, R., (2016). Energy security through a framework of country risks and vulnerabilities. Energy Sources, Part B: Econ. Plan. Policy, 11(1): 32-37 (7 pages).
Lee, M.; Keller, A.A.; Chiang, P.C.; Den, W.; Wang, H.; Hou, C.H.; Yan, J., (2017). Water-energy nexus for urban water systems: A comparative review on energy intensity and environmental impacts in relation to global water risks. Appl. Energy, 205: 589-601 (13 pages).
Liu, P.; Zhou, Y.; Zhou, D.K.; Xue, L., (2017). Energy Performance Contract models for the diffusion of green-manufacturing technologies in China: A stakeholder analysis from SMEs’ perspective. Energy Policy, 106: 59-67 (9 pages).
Liu, X.; Zeng, M., (2017). Renewable energy investment risk evaluation model based on system dynamics. Renewable Sustain. Energy Rev., 73: 782-788 (7 pages).
Marzi, S.; Farnia, L.; Dasgupta, S.; Mysiak, J.; Lorenzoni, A., (2019). Competence analysis for promoting energy efficiency projects in developing countries: The case of OPEC. Energy, 189: 115996.
Mazzucato, M.; Semieniuk, G., (2018). Financing renewable energy: Who is financing what and why it matters. Technol. Forecasting Soc. Change, 127: 8-22 (15 pages).
Mihić, M.M.; Dodevska, Z.A.; Todorović, M.L.; Obradović, V.L.; Petrović, D.Č., (2018). Reducing Risks in Energy Innovation Projects: Complexity Theory Perspective. Sustainability, 10(9): 1-11 (11 pages).
Moser, D.; Del Buono, M.; Jahn, U.; Herz, M.; Richter, M.; De Brabandere, K., (2017). Identification of technical risks in the photovoltaic value chain and quantification of the economic impact. Prog. Photovoltaics Res. Appl., 25(7): 592-604 (13 pages).
Nakano, M.; Lau, A.K., (2020). A systematic review on supply chain risk management: using the strategy-structure-process-performance framework. Intern. J. Log. Res. Applications, 23(5): 443-473 (30 pages).
Parpairi, K., (2017). Sustainability and Energy Use in Small Scale Greek Hotels: Energy Saving Strategiesand Environmental Policies. Procedia Environ. Sci., 38: 169-177 (9 pages).
Radovanović, M.; Filipović, S.; Pavlović, D., (2017). Energy security measurement–A sustainable approach. Renewable Sustain. Energy Rev., 68: 1020-1032 (13 pages).
Ragosa, G.; Warren, P., (2019). Unpacking the determinants of cross-border private investment in renewable energy in developing countries. J. Cleaner Prod., 235: 854-865 (12 pages).
Rehman, A.U.; Anwar, M., (2019). Mediating role of enterprise risk management practices between business strategy and SME performance. Small Enterprise Resear., 26(2): 207-227 (20 pages). Saługa, P.W.; Szczepańska-Woszczyna, K.; Miśkiewicz, R.; Chłąd, M., (2020). Cost of equity of coal-fired power generation projects in Poland: Its importance for the management of decision-making process. Energies, 13(18): 4833.
Schittekatte, T.; Meeus, L.; Jamasb, T.; Llorca, M., (2021). Regulatory experimentation in energy: Three pioneer countries and lessons for the green transition. Energy Policy, 156: 112382.
Shahsavari, A.; Akbari, M., (2018). Potential of solar energy in developing countries for reducing energy-related emissions. Renewable Sustain. Energy Rev., 90: 275-291 (22 pages).
Sovacool, B.K.; Heffron, R.J.; McCauley, D.; Goldthau, A, (2016). Energy decisions reframed as justice and ethical concerns. Nat. Energy, 1(5): 1-6 (6 pages).
Steffen, B, (2018). The importance of project finance for renewable energy projects. Energy Econ., 69: 280-294 (15 pages).
Tang, Y.; Cai, H.; Liu, R., (2021). Farmers’ demand for informal risk management strategy and weather index insurance: evidence from China.  Int. J. Disaster Risk Sci., 12(2): 281-297 (17 pages).
Thomson, H.; Snell, C.; Bouzarovski, S., (2017). Health, well-being and energy poverty in Europe: A comparative study of 32 European countries. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 14(6): 584.
Wagner, A.; Grobelski, T.; Harembski, M., (2016). Is energy policy a public issue? Nuclear power in Poland and implications for energy transitions in Central and East Europe. Energy Res. Soc. Sci., 13: 158-169 (12 pages).
Wang, L.; Peng, J.J.; Wang, J.Q., (2018). A multi-criteria decision-making framework for risk ranking of energy performance contracting project under picture fuzzy environment. J. Cleaner Prod., 191: 105-118 (14 pages).
Wang, Z., (2019). Does biomass energy consumption help to control environmental pollution? Evidence from BRICS countries. Sci. Total Environ., 670: 1075-1083 (9 pages).
Wang, Z.; Xu, G.; Lin, R.; Wang, H.; Ren, J., (2019). Energy performance contracting, risk factors, and policy implications: Identification and analysis of risks based on the best-worst network method. Energy, 170: 1-13 (13 pages).
Wei, S.; Hassan, T.M.; Firth, S.K.; Fouchal, F., (2017). Impact of occupant behaviour on the energy-saving potential of retrofit measures for a public building in the UK. Intell. Build. Int., 9(2): 97-106 (10 pages).
Yang, C.H.; Lee, K.C., (2020). Developing a strategy map for forensic accounting with fraud risk management: An integrated balanced scorecard-based decision model. Evaluation and Program Plan., 80: 101780.
Zare, R.; Nouri, J.; Abdoli, M.A.; Atabi, F., (2016). Application integrated fuzzy TOPSIS based on LCA results and the nearest weighted approximation of FNs for industrial waste management-aluminum industry: Arak-Iran. Indian J. of Science and Technol., 9(2): 2-11 (10 pages).
Zare, R.; Nouri, J.; Abdoli, M.A.; Atabi, F., (2016). Life cycle assessment of secondary extruded aluminum production process in industrial city of Arak. Appl. Ecology and Environ. Research, 14(2): 125-135 (11 pages).

LETTERS TO EDITOR

International Journal of Human Capital in Urban Management (IJHCUM) welcomes letters to the editor for the post-publication discussions and corrections which allows debate post publication on its site, through the Letters to Editor. Letters pertaining to manuscript published in IJHCUM should be sent to the editorial office of IJHCUM within three months of either online publication or before printed publication, except for critiques of original research. Following points are to be considering before sending the letters (comments) to the editor.


[1] Letters that include statements of statistics, facts, research, or theories should include appropriate references, although more than three are discouraged.

[2] Letters that are personal attacks on an author rather than thoughtful criticism of the author’s ideas will not be considered for publication.

[3] Letters can be no more than 300 words in length.

[4] Letter writers should include a statement at the beginning of the letter stating that it is being submitted either for publication or not.

[5] Anonymous letters will not be considered.

[6] Letter writers must include their city and state of residence or work.

[7] Letters will be edited for clarity and length.

Send comment about this article
Enter Name.
Enter a valid email address.
Enter a vaid affiliation.
Enter comments (At leaset 10 words)
CAPTCHA Image
Enter Security Code Correctly.
International Journal of Human Capital in Urban Management
Volume 8, Issue 2 - Serial Number 30
Spring 2023
Pages 143-160

  • Receive Date 18 October 2022
  • Revise Date 12 December 2023
  • Accept Date 21 January 2023

Home

Authorship

Submit Manuscript

Indexing and Abstracting

Editorial Board

Unrestricted Reuse in Compliance with BOAI

Open Access Policy

Self-Archiving Policy

Privacy Statement

Publisher Business Model

Publisher and Sponsor

Contact Us