Implementation of the integrated management dashboard for learning processes based on ISO 29990

Mirpour, S.M.; Mirafshar, B.

doi:10.22034/IJHCUM.2018.03.05

Document Type : CASE STUDY

Authors

S.M. Mirpour ¹
B. Mirafshar ²

¹ Department of Planning and training, Tehran Municipality, Tehran, Iran

² Department of human resource management,Tehran municipality

https://doi.org/10.22034/IJHCUM.2018.03.05

Abstract

The current research is trying to identify the effective modules (system modules) that form the integrated e-learning dashboard for educational processes and learning opportunities based on ISO 29990 in the municipality of Tehran. The educational process management system, which is currently providing classroom training services, is able to improve the situation by incorporating integrated management systems for human resources development processes. Based on the conceptual model, the construction of the four main factors, the process of management system, the learning management system, evaluation and effectiveness system, the employee competence development system are marked as the factors that included in the electronic management dashboard of learning processes are in interaction with their constructive components, which, according to the problem and research questions, they were tested in terms of factor load and their effect on each other after defining the variables in the software and recording data using factor analysis and multiple regression at a meaningful level. The most influential factors with the 0.875 was the Process Management System, and other factors with the difference in impact levels being prioritized in the next rankings. Also, the fit of the whole model was calculated based on the relevant index along with the validity of the research structure and the result were positively evaluated.

Keywords

Main Subjects

Information and communications technology in Urban Management

References

Albrecht, K., (2003). The power of minds at work: Organizational intelligence in action. AMACOM, American Management Association.

Aydın, C.H.; Tasci, D., (2005). Measuring readiness for e-learning: Reflections from an emerging country. Educ. Tech. Soc., 8 (4): 244-257 (14 pages).

Jerman-Blažič, B.; Klobučar, T., (2005). Privacy provision in e-learning standardized systems: status and improvements. Comp. stand. Inter., 27(6): 561-578 (18 pages).

Dawes, P. L., (2003). A model of the effects of technical consultants on organizational learning in high-technology purchase situations. J. High Tech. Manage. Res., 14(1): 1-20 (20 pages). Gladun, A.; Rogushina, J.; Garcı, F.; Martínez-Béjar, R.; Fernández-Breis, J.T., (2009). An application of intelligent techniques and semantic web technologies in e-learning environments. Expert Syst. Appl., 36(2): 1922-1931(10 pages).

Gartner, W.B., (2001). Is there an elephant in entrepreneurship? Blind assumptions in theory development. Entrepreneurship Theory Pract., 25(4): 27-39 (13 pages).

Raskino, M.; Waller, G., (2016). Digital to the Core: Remastering Leadership for Your Industry, Your Enterprise, and Yourself. Routledge.

Fox, J.M., (2005). Organizational entrepreneurship and the organizational performance linkage in university extension. Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of the Ohio State University.

Hulland, J., (1999). Use of partial least squares (PLS) in strategic management research: A review of four recent studies. Strat. Manage. j., 20(2): 195-204 (10 pages).

Wu, J.H.; Tennyson, R.D.; Hsia, T.L; Liao, Y.W., (2008). Analysis of E-learning innovation and core capability using a hypercube model. Comput. Hum. Behav., 24(5): 1851-1866 (16 pages).

Ruiz, M.D.P.P.; Díaz, M.J.F.; Soler, F.O.; Pérez, J.R.P., (2008). Adaptation in current e-learning systems. Comput. Stand. Inter., 30(1-2): 62-70 (9 pages).

Krohwinkel-Karlsson, A., (2007). Knowledge and Learning in Aid Organizations. A literature review with suggestions for further studies. Karlstad (Sweden): Swedish Agency for Development Evaluation.

Kline, R.B., (2015). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. Guilford publications.

Keyes, J., (2006). Knowledge management, business intelligence, and content management: the IT practitioner''s guide. Auerbach Publications.

Liao, S.H.; Fei, W.C.; Liu, C.T., (2008). Relationships between knowledge inertia, organizational learning and organization innovation. Technovation, 28(4): 183-195 (13 pages).

Spataro, Mike. (2010). Social Intelligence: Defined for the Enterprise. Intelligence social media today networks.

Lopes, C.T., (2007). Evaluating e-learning readiness in a health sciences higher education institution. In IADIS International conference e-learning. 59- 67 (9 pages).

Silber, K.H. and Kearny, L., (2009). Organizational intelligence: A guide to understanding the business of your organization for HR, training, and performance consulting. John Wiley and Sons publication.

Yolles, M., (2005). Organizational Intelligence. J. Workplace Learning, 17(1/2): 99-114 (16 pages).

So, K.K.T.; Swatman, P.M.C., (2006). E-Learning Readiness in the Classroom: a study of Hong Kong primary and secondary teachers. CollECTeR Europe 2006, 223- 237 (15 pages).

Stricker, D.; Weibel, D.; Wissmath, B., (2011). Efficient learning using a virtual learning environment in a university class. Computers and Education, 56(2): 495-504 (10 pages).

Slater, S.F.; Mohr, J.J.; Sengupta, S., (2010). Market orientation. Wiley International Encyclopedia of Marketing.

Johnson, L.; Becker, S.A.; Cummins, M.; Estrada, V.; Freeman, A.; Hall, C., (2016). NMC horizon report: 2016 higher education edition. The New Media Consortium, 1- 50 (50 pages).

Osterwalder, A.; Pigneur, Y.; Tucci, C.L., (2005). Clarifying business models: Origins, present, and future of the concept. Communications of the association for Information Systems, 16(1): 1- 25 (25 pages).

Mertens, D.M., (2014). Research and evaluation in education and psychology: Integrating diversity with quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods. Sage publications.

Chen, I.J.; Popovich, K., (2003). Understanding customer relationship management (CRM) People, process and technology. Bus. Proc. Manage. J., 9(5): 672-688 (17 pages).

Laudon, K.C.; Laudon, J.P., (2007). Management information systems: Managing the digital firm with emphasis on the integration of three technologies, 2(1): 103-105 (3 pages).

Clark, R.C.; Mayer, R.E., (2016). E-learning and the science of instruction: Proven guidelines for consumers and designers of multimedia learning. John Wiley and Sons publications.

Linthicum, D.S., (2003). Next generation application integration: from simple information to Web services. Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc.

Silverthorne, C., (2004). The impact of organizational culture and person-organization fit on organizational commitment and job satisfaction in Taiwan. Leadership Org. Dev. J., 25(7): 592-599 (8 pages).

Madanipour, A., (1999). City profile: Tehran. Cities, 16(1): 57-65 (9 pages).

Siemens, G., (2013). Learning analytics: The emergence of a discipline. Am. Behav. Sci., 57(10): 380-1400 (21 pages).

Fornell, C.; Larcker, D.F., (1981). Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: Algebra and statistics. J. Marketing Res., 382-388 (7 pages).

LETTERS TO EDITOR

International Journal of Human Capital in Urban Management (IJHCUM) welcomes letters to the editor for the post-publication discussions and corrections which allows debate post publication on its site, through the Letters to Editor. Letters pertaining to manuscript published in IJHCUM should be sent to the editorial office of IJHCUM within three months of either online publication or before printed publication, except for critiques of original research. Following points are to be considering before sending the letters (comments) to the editor.

[1] Letters that include statements of statistics, facts, research, or theories should include appropriate references, although more than three are discouraged.

[2] Letters that are personal attacks on an author rather than thoughtful criticism of the author’s ideas will not be considered for publication.

[3] Letters can be no more than 300 words in length.

[4] Letter writers should include a statement at the beginning of the letter stating that it is being submitted either for publication or not.

[5] Anonymous letters will not be considered.

[6] Letter writers must include their city and state of residence or work.

[7] Letters will be edited for clarity and length.

Name *

Email Address *

Affiliation *

Comments *

Security Code *

International Journal of Human Capital in Urban Management

Implementation of the integrated management dashboard for learning processes based on ISO 29990

References

References

Send comment about this article

Volume 3, Issue 3 - Serial Number 11
July 2018
Pages 223-230

Implementation of the integrated management dashboard for learning processes based on ISO 29990

References

References

Send comment about this article

Volume 3, Issue 3 - Serial Number 11July 2018Pages 223-230

Volume 3, Issue 3 - Serial Number 11
July 2018
Pages 223-230