1 Management and Entrepreneurship Department, Coles College of Business, Kennesaw State University, 560 Parliament Garden Way, Kennesaw, GA 30144-8599, U.S.A.

2 College of Management, Central Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Azadi Street, Tehran, Iran


The foundation of most intellectual discourse is Western-centric to the exclusion of other views. This includes ideal patterns of social interaction, preference for aesthetic, accepted norms and values, and the concepts of dignity, respectability, morality and ethics. Such a position is culturally myopic. Western cultural influence colors all of them including moral precepts. The assumption is that Western-centric moral precepts are universally followed. This paper explores these concepts and discusses the dominance of Western-centric point of view in moral precepts. It describes how non-Western-centric views are different and argues that understanding non-Western-centric concepts is a useful undertaking that could expand our horizons.


Main Subjects

Anderson, P., (1988). Explaining Intercultural Differences in Nonverbal Communication. In L. A. Samovar and R. E. Porter (eds.), Intercultural Communication: A Reader, 5th edn., pp. 272-281.
Diener, E.; Oishi, S.; Lucas, R.E., (2003). Personality, culture, and subjective well-being: Emotional and cognitive evaluations of life. Annu. Rev. Psychol., 54(1): 403-425 (23 pages).
Dore, R.P., (2013). City life in Japan. Routledge.
Doktor, R., (1983). Some tentative comments on Japanese and American decision making. Decision Sci., 14 (4): 607-612 (6 pages).
Esyun, H.; Shumpei, K.; Creighton, M.R., (1985). A contextual model of the Japanese: Toward a methodological innovation in Japan studies. J. Jpn. Stud., 11(2): 289-321 (33 pages).
Fatehi, K.; Kedia, B. L.; Priestley, J.L., (2015). Mindscapes and individual heterogeneity within and between cultures. J. Bus. Res., 68(2): 291-298 (8 pages).
Fatehi, K.; Tate, U. S., (2014). A psychological perspective on cultural difference: Epistemological heterogeneity and individual heterogeneity across cultures. Eur. Sci. J., 10(8): 267-286 (20 pages).
Festinger, (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Palo Alto, University of California Press, CA. 
Forsyth, D. R., (1980). A taxonomy of ethical ideologies. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol., 39(1): 175-184 (10 pages).
Fritzsche, D.J.; Becker, H., (1984). Linking management behavior to ethical philosophy—An empirical investigation. Acad. Manage. J., 27(1): 166-175 (10 pages).
Gammack, J., (2002). Mindscape and internet-mediated communication. J. Computer-Mediated Commun., 7(3): 1-19 (19 pages).
Gannon, M. J., (2004). Understanding global cultures: Metaphorical journeys through 28 nations, clusters of nations, and continents. Sage, pp. 47-67
Gunther, G., (2015). Aristotelian and non-Aristotelian logic, Available at:, (Accessed 9 March, 2016). 
Harvey, O.J., (1966). System structure, flexibility and creativity, In O.J. Harvey (ed.), Experience structure & adaptability, Springer Publishing Company, New York, pp. 39-65.
Hernandez, M.; Iyengar, S. S., (2001). What drives whom? A cultural perspective on human agency. Soc. Cognition,  19(3): 269-294 (26 pages).
Hofstede, G., (1984). Culture's consequences: International differences in work-related values, Vol. 5, sage, p. 390
Hofstede, G.H.; Hofstede, G., (2001). Culture's consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions and organizations across nations. Sage Publications, Inc.
Hofstede, G.; Bond, M.H., (1988). The Confucius connection: From cultural roots to economic growth. Organ. Dyn., 16(4): 5-21 (17 pages).
Iwata, R., (1982). Japanese-style management: Its foundations and prospects. Quality Resources.
Kaushal, R.; Kwantes, C.T., (2006). The role of culture and personality in choice of conflict management strategy. Int. J. Intercult. Rel., 30(5): 579-603 (25 pages).
Korzybski, A., (1958). Science and sanity: An introduction to non-Aristotelian systems and general semantics. Institute of General Semantics.
Markus, H. R.; Kitayama, S., (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychol. Rev., 98(2): 224-253 (30 pages).
Maruyama, M., (1960). Morphogenesis and morphostasis. Methodos, 12(48): 251-296 (46 pages).
Maruyama, M.; Beals, K.L.; Bharati, A.; Fuchs, H.; Gardner, P.M.; Guilmet, G.M.; Hahn, R.A.; Kamau, L.J.; Kronenfeld, D.B.; Kursh, C.O.; Meeker, J.W., (1980). Mindscapes and Science Theories [and Comments and Reply]. Curr. Anthropol., 21(5): 589-608 (20 pages).
Maruyama, M., (1989). Epistemological Sources of New Business Problems in the International Evironment. Hum. Syst. Manage., 8(1): 71-80 (10 pages). 
Maruyama, M., (1992a). Anti-monopoly law to prevent dominance by one theory in academic departments. Hum. Syst. Manage., 11(4): 219-220 (2 pages).
Maruyama, M., (1992b). Changing dimensions in international business. Acad. Manage. Exec., 6 (3): 88-96 (9 pages).
Maruyama, M., (1994a). Mindscape in management. Aldershot, Dartmouth Publishing Company, England.
Maruyama, M. (1994b). Psychological tests for epistemological heterogeneity across cultures. Commun. Cogn., 27(4): 277-396 (120 pages). 
Maruyama, M., (1995). Individual epistemological heterogeneity across cultures and its use in organizations. Cybernetica 1995; 37(3): 215-249 (35 pages).
Maruyama, M., (1999). Self-heterogeneization and cultural milieu selection: Two new directions in counseling, in Pederson, P. (ed.), Multiculturalism as a fourth force, Brunner/Mazel (Taylor and Francis), Philadelphia.
Maruyama, M., (2002). How to generate cultural and philosophical goals ahead of technology. Futures Res. Quart., 18(1): 5-32 (28 pages).
Maruyama, M. (2007). Extension of Sartre’s philosophy for today’s world situation. Int. Rev. Soc., 17(3): 429-441 (13 pages).
Masuda, T.; Nisbett, R.E., (2001). Attending holistically versus analytically: comparing the context sensitivity of Japanese and Americans. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol., 81(5): 922-934 (13 pages).
McSweeney, B., (2002). Hofstede’s model of national cultural differences and their consequences: A triumph of faith- a failure of analysis. Hum. Relat., 55(1): 89-118 (30 pages).
McSweeney, B., (2009). Dynamic diversity: variety and variation within countries. Organ. Stud., 30(9): 933-957 (25 pages).
McSweeney, B., (2013). Fashion founded on a flaw: the ecological mono-deterministic fallacy of Hofstede, GLOBE, and followers. Int. Market. Rev., 30(5): 483-504 (22 pages).
Nakamura, H., (1964). Ways of Thinking of Eastern People, Honolulu, East-West Center Press, HI.
Neisser, U. (1988). Five kinds of self‐knowledge. Philos. Psychol., 1(1): 35-59 (25 pages).
Nisbet, R.E., (2003). The geography of thought. N. Brealey Publishing, London.                                                                                            
Pattee, H.H., (2012). Evolving self-reference: matter, symbols, and semantic closure. In law, language and life. (pp. 211-226). Springer Netherlands.
Premeaux, S. R., (2004). The current link between management behavior and ethical philosophy. J. Bus. Ethics, 51(3): 269-278 (10 pages).
Premeaux, S., (2009). The link between management behavior and ethical philosophy in the wake of the Enron convictions. J. Bus. Ethics, 85(1): 13-25 (13 pages).
Sampson, E.E., (1989). The challenge of social change for psychology: Globalization and psychology's theory of the person. Am. Psychol., 44(6): 914-921 (8 pages).
Triandis, H. C.; Comtempo, R.; Villareal, M. J., (1988). Individualism-collectivism: Cross-cultural perspectives on self-grouping relationships. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol., 54: 323-338 (16 pages).                                                                              
Tusunoda, T., (1975). The differences of recognition mechanism toward natural sounds between Japanese and Westerners. Medicine and Biology, 88: 309-314 (6 pages).
Tusunoda, T., (1979). Difference in the mechanism of emotion in Japanese and Westerners. Psychother.  Psychosom., 31(1-4): 367-372 (6 pages).
Venaik, S.; Midgley, D.F., (2015). Mindscapes across landscapes: Archetypes of transnational and subnational culture. J.  Int.  Bus. Stud., 46(9): 1051-1079 (30 pages). 
Wikipedia, (2015). Talk: non-aristotelian logic, Available at:, (Accessed 9 March, 2016).


International Journal of Human Capital in Urban Management (IJHCUM) welcomes letters to the editor for the post-publication discussions and corrections which allows debate post publication on its site, through the Letters to Editor. Letters pertaining to manuscript published in IJHCUM should be sent to the editorial office of IJHCUM within three months of either online publication or before printed publication, except for critiques of original research. Following points are to be considering before sending the letters (comments) to the editor.

[1] Letters that include statements of statistics, facts, research, or theories should include appropriate references, although more than three are discouraged.

[2] Letters that are personal attacks on an author rather than thoughtful criticism of the author’s ideas will not be considered for publication.

[3] Letters can be no more than 300 words in length.

[4] Letter writers should include a statement at the beginning of the letter stating that it is being submitted either for publication or not.

[5] Anonymous letters will not be considered.

[6] Letter writers must include their city and state of residence or work.

[7] Letters will be edited for clarity and length.