Department of Public Administration, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran


The purpose of the present research was to investigate the relationships between justice perceptions, employee's misbehavior and cynicism to organization because very few studies have looked at the role of justice and cynicism in the prediction of employee's misbehavior in public organizations. According to the purpose of study, the present research is developmental research. Also according to way of data collection (research project), the present study are descriptive research. In classification based on the type of research, this study is correlational research. In the current research, the population under analysis consists of a public organization. Participants were 420 employees and all of them were administrative employee. The results of the present research revealed that justice perceptions will be negatively associated with employee's misbehavior; negatively predicted employee's cynicism and finally the relationship between organizational justice and misbehavior will be mediated by employee's cynicism. The present results both support previous research and extend our perception in relation with the mechanisms through which justice influences on employee's misbehavior.


Main Subjects

Ackroyd, S.; Thompson, P., (1999). Organizational Misbehavior.London, UK: Sage.
Adams, J. S. (1963). Toward an understanding of inequity. J. Abnormal Social Psychol., 67:422–436 (15 pages).
Ajzen, I., (1994). Attitudes. In R. J. Corsini (Ed.), Encyclopedia of psychology (2nd Ed.), pp.114- 116. New York, Wiley Publisher (3 pages).
Ambrose, M.L.; Schminke, M., (2001). Procedural justice in the 21st century: the impact of organizational structure. In R. Cropanzano (Ed.), Justice in the workplace (Vol. 2): From theory to practice, pp. 229–244. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum (16 pages).
Ambrose, M. L.; Seabright, M.A.; Schminke, M., (2002). Sabotage in the workplace: The role of organizational injustice. Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 89: 947–965 (19 pages).
Anderson, L.M.; Pearson, C. M., (1999). Tit for tat? The spiraling effect of incivility in the workplace. The Academy of Manage. Rev., 24: 452-471 (20 pages).
Andersson, L. M., (1996). Employee cynicism: An examination using a contract violation framework. Human Relations, 49: 1395-1418 (24 pages).
Aquino, K.; Galperin, B. L.; Bennett, R. J., (2004). Social status and aggressiveness as moderators of the relationship between interactional justice and workplace deviance. J. Applied Social Psychol., 34: 1001-1029 (29 pages).
Aquino, K.; Lewis, M.U.; Bradfield, M., (1999). Justice constructs, negative affectivity, and employee deviance: A proposed model and empirical test. J. Organizational Behav., 20: 1073-1091 (19 pages).
Bashir, S., (2009). Antecedents of counter work behavior in public sector organizations. An Asian perspective.
Interdisciplinary J. Contemporary Res. In Business, 1: 58–68 (11 pages).
Bennett, R.J.; Robinson, S.L., (2000). Development of a measure of workplace deviance. J. Appl. Psychol., 85: 349-360 (12 pages).
Bensimon, H., (1997). What to do about anger in the workplace. Training and Development, 51: 28-32 (5 pages).
Bies, R.J.; Moag, J.S., (1986). Interactional justice: Communication criteria of fairness. Res. Negotiation Organizations, 11: 43–55 (13 pages).
Blauner, R., (1964). Alienation and freedom: The factory worker and his industry. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Brandes, P.; Dharwadkar, R.; Dean, J. W., (1999). Does Organizational Cynicism Matter? Employee and supervisor perspectives on work outcomes. Eastern Academy of Management Proceedings, 150-153 (4 pages).
Breckler, S.J., (1984). Empirical validation of affect, behavior, and cognition as distinct components of attitude. J. Personality Social Psychol., 47: 307–311 (5 pages).
Buss, D., (1993). Ways to curtail employee theft. Nation’s Business, 81: 36-37 (2 pages).
Byrne, B.M., (2006). Structural equation modeling with EQS: Basic concepts, applications and programming. 2nd Ed. Lawrence Erlbaum, New York: NY.
Chiaburu, D.S.; Lorinkova, N.; Van Dyne, L., (2013). Employees’ social context and change-oriented citizenship: A meta-analysis of leader, coworker, and organizational influences. Group and Organization Manage., 38: 233-291 (59 pages).
Chiaburu, D.S.; Peng, A.C.; Oh, I.; Banks, G.C.; Lomeli, L. C., (2013). Antecedents and consequences of employee organizational cynicism: A meta-analysis. J. Vocational
Behav., 83: 181-197 (17 pages).
Child, J., (1977). Organization: A guide to problems and practice. New York: Harper and Row.
Coetzee, M., (2005). The fairness of affirmative action: An organizational justice perspective, University of Pretoria, Pretoria.
Cohen-Charash, Y.; Spector, P.E., (2001). The role of justice in organizations: A meta-analysis. Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 86: 278–321 (44 pages).
Collinson, D.L., (2000). Managing humor. J. Manage. Studies, 39: 269–288 (20 pages).
Colquitt, J.A.; Conlon, D.E.; Wesson, M.J.; Porter, C.O.L.H.; Ng, K.Y., (2001). Justice at the millennium: A meta-analytic review of 25 years of organizational justice research. J.
Appl. Psychol., 86: 425–445 (21 pages).
Conlon, D.E.; Meyer. C.J.; Nowakowski, J.M., (2005). How does organizational justice affect performance, withdrawal, and counterproductive behavior? In J. Greenberg and J. A.
Colquitt (Eds.). The handbook of organizational justice,301-328. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum (28 pages).
Cropanzano, R.; Greenberg, J., (1997). Progress in organizational justice: Tunneling through the maze. In L.T. Robertson and C. L. Cooper (Eds.), International review of industrial and organizational psychology (pp. 317–372). New York: John Wiley and Sons (56 pages).
Cropanzano, R.; Howes, J.C.; Grandey, A. A.; Toth, P., (1997). The relationship of organizational politics and support to work behaviors, attitudes, and stress. J. Organizational Behav.,18: 159–180 (22 pages).
Cropanzano, R.; Rupp, D.E.; Mohler, C.J.; Schminke, M., (2001). Three roads to organizational justice. In G. Ferris (Ed.), Res. Personnel Human Resource Manage. 1–113. Kidlington,Oxford: Elsevier Science (113 pages).
Darren, C.T.; Wayne, A.H.; Charles, J.K.; Gerald, R.F., (2005). Political will, political skill and political behavior. J. Organizational Behav., 26: 229-245 (17 pages).
Dean, J.W.; Brandes, P.; Dharwadkar, R., (1998). Organizational cynicism. The Academy of Manage. Rev., 23: 341-352 (12 pages).
Di Fabio, A.; Palazzeschi, L., (2012). Organizational justice: Personality traits or emotional intelligence? An empirical study in an Italian hospital context. J. Employment
Counseling, 49: 31–42 (12 pages).
Dyne, L.V.; Graham, J.W.; Dienesch, R.M., (1994). Organizational citizenship behavior: Construct redefinition, measurement, and validation. Academy of Manage. J., 37: 765-802 (47 pages).
Forgas, J.P., (1995). Mood and judgment: The affect infusion model (AIM). Psychological Bulletin, 117: 39–66 (28 pages).
Fredrickson, J.W., (1984). The comprehensiveness of strategic decision processes: extension, observations, future directions. Academy Manage. J., 27: 445–466 (22 pages).
Gouldner, A.W., (1959). Organizational analysis. In R. K. Merton, L. Broom, and L. S. Cottrel (Eds.), Sociology today. New York: Basic Books.
Greenberg, A.W., (1990). Patterns of industrial bureaucracy. New York: the free press.
Greenberg, J., (1993). The social side of fairness: Interpersonal and informational classes of organizational justice. In R. Cropanzano (Ed.), Justice in the work place: Approaching fairness in human resource management (pp. 79-103). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates (25 pages).
Gruys, M.L.; Sackett, P.R., (2003). Investigating the dimensionality of counter productive work behavior. Int. J. Selection Assess., 11: 30"42 (13 pages).
Hall, R.H.; Haas, J. E.; Johnson, N.J., (1967). Organizational size, complexity, and formalization. Am. Sociological Rev., 32: 903–912 (10 pages).
Hartman, S.J.; Yrle, A.C.; Galle, W.P., (1999). Procedural and distributive justice: examining equity in a university setting. J. Business Ethics, 20: 337-51 (15 pages).
Hollinger, R.C., (1991). Neutralizing in the workshop: An empirical analysis of property theft and production deviance. Deviant behave.: An interdisciplinary j., 12: 169–202 (34
James, H.S.; Sykuta, M.E., (2005). Property right and organizational characteristics of producer-owned firms and organizational trust. Annals of Public and Cooperative
Economics, 76: 545-580 (36 pages). James, M.S.L., (2005). Antecedents and consequences of
cynicism in organizations: An examination of the potential positive and negative effects on school systems, Florida State University, Shalonda Long.
Judge, T.A.; LePine, J.A.; Rich, B.L., (2006). Loving yourself abundantly: Relationship of the narcissistic personality to self and other perceptions of workplace deviance, leadership, and task and contextual performance. J. Appl. Psychol. 91:762-776 (15 pages).
Judge, T.; Scott, B.A.; Ilies, R., (2006). Hostility, job attitudes, and workplace deviance: Test of a multilevel model. J. Appl. Psychol., 91: 126–138 (13 pages).
Kanungo, R.N., (1982). Work alienation: An integrative approach. New York: Praeger Publishers.
Kim, H.S., (2005). Organizational structure and internal communication as antecedents of employee-organization relationships in the context of organizational justice: a multilevel analysis. Faculty of the Graduate School of the University of Maryland.
Knights, D.; McCabe, D., (2000). Ain’t misbehaving? Opportunities for resistance under new forms of quality management. Sociology, 34: 421–436 (16 pages).
Konovsky, M.A., (2000). Understanding procedural justice and its impact on business organizations. J. Manage., 26: 489–511 (23 pages).
Liao, H.; Rupp, D.E., (2005). The impact of justice climate and justice orientation on work outcomes: a cross-level multifoci framework. J. Appl. Psychol., 90: 242-256 (15 pages).
Mars, G., (1982). Cheats at work: anthropology of workplace crime. London, UK: George Allen and Unwin. Masterson, S.S.; Lewis, K.; Goldman, B.M.; Taylor, M.S., (2000). Integrating justice and social exchange: the differing effects of fair procedures and treatment of work relationships. Academy Manage. J., 43: 738–748 (11 pages).
Moghimi, S.M., (2006). Special discussions on public administration. Tehran: SAMT Publications. Mossholder, K.W.; Bennett, N.; Martin, C.L., (1998). A multilevel analysis of procedural justice context. J. Organizational Behav., 19: 131-141 (11 pages).
Niehoff, B.P.: Moorman, R.H., (1993). Justice as a mediator of the relationship between methods of monitoring and organizational citizenship behavior. Academy Manage. J., 36: 527-556 (30 pages).
Ohana, M., (2014). A multilevel study of the relationship between organizational justice and affective commitment. Personnel Rev., 43: 654-671 (18 pages).
Price, J.L., (1972). Handbook of organizational measurement. Lexington, MA: Heath.
Randall, M.L.; Cropanzano, R.; Bormann, C.A.; Birjulin, A., (1999). Organizational politics and organizational support as predictors of work attitudes, job performance, and organizational citizenship behaviors. J. Organizational Behav., 20: 159–174 (16 pages).
Reichers, A.E.; Wanous, J.P.; Austin, J.T., (1997). Understanding and managing cynicism about organizational change. Academy Manage. Executive, 11: 48-59 (12 pages).
Reichers, A.E.; Wanous, J.P.; Austin, J.T., (1997). Understanding and managing cynicism about organizational change. Academy Manage. Executive, 11: 48–59 (Retrieved
Roberson, Q.M.; Colquitt, J.A., (2005). Shared and configural justice: a social network model of justice in teams. Academy Manage. Rev., 30, 595-607 (13 pages).
Robinson S.L.; Bennett R.J., (1995). A Typology of deviant workplace behaviors: A multidimensional scaling study. Academy Manage. J., 38: 555-572 (18 pages).
Schminke, M.; Ambrose, A.L.; Cropanzano, R.S., (2000). The effect of organizational structure on perceptions of procedural fairness. J. Appl. Psychol., 85: 294–304 (11 pages).
Schrijver, D.A.; Delbeke, K.; Maesschalck, J.; Pleysier, S., (2010). Fairness perceptions and organizational misbehavior: An empirical study. Am. Rev. Public Administration, 40: 691–703 (13 pages).
Skarlicki, D.P.; Folger, R., (1997). Retaliation in the workplace: The roles of distributive, procedural, and interactional justice. J. Appl. Psychol., 82: 434–443 (10 pages).
Spell, C.S.; Arnold, T.J., (2007). A multi-level analysis of organizational justice climate, structure, and employee mental health. J. Manage., 33: 724-751 (28 pages).
Taylor, P.; Bain, P., (2003). Subterranean work sick blues’: Humor as subversion in two call Centers. Organization Stud., 24: 487-509 (23 pages).
Trevino, L.K.; Weaver, G.R., (2001). Organizational justice and ethics program follow-through: Influences on employees harmful and helpful behavior. Business Ethics Quarterly, 11: 651-671 (21 pages).
Trist, E.L.; Bamforth, K.W. (1951). Some social and psychological consequences of the longwall method of coalgetting. Human Relations, 4: 3–38 (36 pages).
Van de Ven, A.; Ferry, D., (1980). Measuring and assessing organizations. New York: Wiley.
Vardi, Y., (2001). The effect of organizational and ethical climates on misconduct at work. J. Business Ethics, 29: 325–337 (13 pages).
Wally, S.; Baum, J.R., (1994). Personal and structural determinants of the pace of strategic decision making. Academy Manage. J., 37: 932–956 (25 pages).
Wanous, J.P.; Reichers, A.E.; Austin, J.T. (1994). Organizational cynicism: An initial study. Academy Manage. Proceedings, 269-273 (5 pages).
Witt, L.A. (1998). Enhancing organizational goal congruence: a solution to organizational politics. J. Appl. Psychol., 83: 666–674 (9 pages).
Wu, C., (2007). Transformational leadership, cohesion perceptions, and employee cynicism about organizational change: The mediating role or justice perceptions. J. Appl. Behav. Sci., 43: 327-351 (25 pages).


International Journal of Human Capital in Urban Management (IJHCUM) welcomes letters to the editor for the post-publication discussions and corrections which allows debate post publication on its site, through the Letters to Editor. Letters pertaining to manuscript published in IJHCUM should be sent to the editorial office of IJHCUM within three months of either online publication or before printed publication, except for critiques of original research. Following points are to be considering before sending the letters (comments) to the editor.

[1] Letters that include statements of statistics, facts, research, or theories should include appropriate references, although more than three are discouraged.

[2] Letters that are personal attacks on an author rather than thoughtful criticism of the author’s ideas will not be considered for publication.

[3] Letters can be no more than 300 words in length.

[4] Letter writers should include a statement at the beginning of the letter stating that it is being submitted either for publication or not.

[5] Anonymous letters will not be considered.

[6] Letter writers must include their city and state of residence or work.

[7] Letters will be edited for clarity and length.