Assessing user’s satisfaction in innovation centers with industrial heritage renovation

Madani, S.S.; Kamelnia, H.; Ghalehnovi, A.

doi:10.22034/IJHCUM.2024.02.07

Document Type : ORIGINAL RESEARCH ARTICLE

Authors

¹ Department of Architecture, Faculty of Architecture and Urban Planning, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran

² Department of Architecture, Khorasan Institute of Higher Education Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran

https://doi.org/10.22034/IJHCUM.2024.02.07

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Adaptive reuse of heritage buildings is important because of their impact on preserving the city's identity and urban integrity, as well as their hidden capabilities and values. In recent years, one of the adaptive reuse projects in existing factories around the world and also in Iran is transforming them into innovation centers. Thus, it is necessary to investigate the effective indicators of designing innovation centers and adapting the industrial heritage buildings to these criteria. This study aims to investigate and prioritize the criteria and indicators of designing innovation centers with industrial heritage renovation.
METHODS: The current study is performed in two phases. First, the related literature was studied and criteria regarding industrial heritage and innovation centers were distinguished. In the next phase, post-occupancy evaluation of two cases of innovation centers in Tehran and Mashhad (Azadi innovation factory and Mashhad innovation factory) was carried out and the results were gained by applying structural equation modeling method using SmartPLS software. Thus, users’ satisfaction level of these criteria and the importance of each criterion from the users' point of view were investigated.
FINDINGS: The results revealed that, for designing innovation centers in industrial heritage sites, four main criteria such as environment, technology and energy, aesthetics and socio-cultural could be discussed. According to the presented structural equation modeling, according to users’ opinion, environment criteria with Path coefficients of 0.4 in both cases is the most important factor while technology criteria with Path coefficients of 0.3 ranks after it. The factor loadings show that attention should be paid to the appropriate dimensions of work spaces (0.8), flexible and appropriate furniture (0.7-0.9), and providing service areas (0.8). Also, creating a sense of place and increasing productivity and improving social interactions were very important from the users' point of view while designing adaptively reused heritage as innovation centers.
CONCLUSION: For designing innovation centers the environment criteria are more important in users’ opinion and more attention should be paid to greenery, space and mass and access to the complex. The environmental comfort factors for users are also of high importance and the users’ satisfaction level reveals that in these two cases users are almost satisfied with the design.

Graphical Abstract

Keywords

Main Subjects

Human capital in urban management

OPEN ACCESS

©2024 The author(s). This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third-party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit:

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

PUBLISHER NOTE

Tehran Urban Research and Planning Center Publisher remains neutral concerning jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

CITATION METRICS & CAPTURES

CURRENT PUBLISHER

Tehran Urban Research and Planning Center: Tehran Municipality

References

Akashah, F.W.; Ali, A.S.; Mohd Zahari, S.F., (2015). Post-occupancy evaluation (POE) of conventional-designed buildings: the effects of users’ comfort on productivity. J. Teknol., 75(1): 1-11 (11 pages).

Alavi, P.; Sobouti, H.; Shahbazi, M., (2022). Evaluating the quality of revitalization of lost spaces

with an emphasis on abandoned factories (case study: zanjan match factory). Int. J. Architect. Urban Dev., 12(1): 31-42 (12 pages).

Ansari, A.; Dornberger, U.; Beermann, H., (2016). An overview of the innovation system in Iran Fraunhofer IMW.

Appel-Meulenbroek, R.; Weijs-Perrée, M.; Orel, M.; Gauger, F.; Pfnür, A., User preferences for coworking spaces; a comparison between the Netherlands, Germany and the Czech Republic. Rev. Manage. Sci., 15:2025–2048 (2021) (24 pages).

Arbab, P.; Alborzi, G., (2022). Toward developing a sustainable regeneration framework for urban industrial heritage. J. Cult. Heritage Manage. Sustain. Dev., 12: 263-274 (12 pages).

Asojo, A.; Vo, H.; Bae, S., (2021). The impact of design interventions on occupant satisfaction: a workplace pre-and post-occupancy evaluation analysis. Sustainability, 13(24): 13571 (16 pages).

Bahramipanah A., (2022). Green contemporization of the ray cement industrial complex with reference to circular economy. Naqshejahan, 12(1): 41-58 (18 pages). (In persian)

Bazazzadeh, H.; Nadolny, A.; Mehan, A.; Hashemi S.S., (2021). The importance of flexibility in adaptive reuse of industrial heritage: learning from Iranian cases. Int. J. Conserv. Sci. 12: 113-128 (16 pages).

Bazazzadeh, H.; Nadolny, A.; Attarian, K.; Najar, S.; HashemiSafaei, S.B., (2022). Evaluating the attribute of industrial heritage in urban context on natural movement distribution. The case study of Dezful city. Int. J. Conserv. Sci. 13(2): 579-592 (15 pages).

Bordass, B.; Leaman, A., (2005). Making feedback and post-occupancy evaluation routine 1: a portfolio of feedback techniques, Build. Res. Inf., 33(4): 347-352 (6 pages).

Bowyer, E.C.; Stephenson, V.; Hawkins, W.; Ibell, T., (2022). New angles for adaptive building reuse research. IOP Conf. Ser.: Earth Environ. Sci., 1078(1): 012022 (12 pages).

Brown, J., (2017). Curating the 'third place '? coworking and the mediation of creativity. Geoforum 82: 112-126 (15 pages).

Chatzi Rodopoulou, T., (2020). Control Shift European Industrial Heritage Reuse in review. Volume 1 and 2.doctoral thesis, A+BE, Architecture and the Built Environ.

Cheung, C.T.; Graham, L.; Tham, K., (2020). Occupant satisfaction with the indoor environment in seven commercial buildings in Singapore. Build. Environ., 188. p. 107443 (22 pages).

Choi, J.H.; Loftness, V.; Aziz, A., (2012). Post-occupancy evaluation of 20 office buildings as basis for future IEQ standards and guidelines. Energy Build., 46: 167-175 (9 pages).

Choi, J.; Moon, J., (2017). Impacts of human and spatial factors on user satisfaction in office Environments. Build. Environ., 114: 23-35 (13 pages).

Cizler, J., (2012). Urban regeneration effects on industrial heritage and local community, case study: leeds, UK, Sociology and space, 193: 223-236 (14 pages).

Clark, J., (2013), Adaptive reuse of industrial heritage: opportunities and challenges, (20 pages).

Deuble, M.P.; De Dear, R.J., (2012). Green users for green buildings: the missing link?. Build. Environ., 56: 21-27 (7 pages).

Dupal, A.; Porubanova, k.; Richnak, P., (2017). Innovation centers and their significance in a competitive environment, J. Interdiscip. Res., 7(2): 170-176 (7 pages).

Ejlali Diz, M.; Sedaghati Dafchahi, M.; Delshad Siahkali, M., (2021). Factors affecting the change in the performance of industrial heritage to public buildings (case study: Haft Chenar wild museum and Shiraz Zaman museum gallery), SHEBAK, 7 (1/58): 35-48 (14 pages). (In Persian)

Esmaeilian Toussi H.; Etessam E., (2019). Analysis of the architecture of the industrial heritage using a combined method of typology and analytical shape grammar (case study of textile factories of Isfahan and Yazd in the Pahlavi era), Naqshejahan ; 9(1): 1-12 (12 pages). (In Persian)

Ferretti, V.; Bottero, M.; Mondini, G., (2014). Decision making and cultural heritage: an application of the multi-attribute value theory for the reuse of historical buildings. J. Cult. Heritage, 15(6): 644-655 (12 pages).

FU, Y.; Li, Y.; Li, X., (2023). Coexisting or coworking? The reconfigured office spaces in two emerging global cities. J. of Urban Affairs (31 pages).

Fuentes, J.M., (2010). Methodological bases for documenting and reusing vernacular farm architecture. J. Cult. Heritage, 11(2): 119-129 (11 pages).

Fuzi, A., (2015), Co-working spaces for promoting entrepreneurship in sparse regions: the case of South Wales, Reg. Stud., Reg. Sci, 2(1): 462-469 (8 pages).

Galaz-Mandakovic F.D.; Rivera Amaro, F., (2023). The industrial heritage of two sacrifice zones and the geopolitics of memory in Northern Chile. The cases of Gatico and Ollagüe. Int. J. Heritage Studies (17 pages).

Garrido-Cifuentes, M.; Santiago-Zaragoza, J. M.; Lafuente-Bolívar, F. J., (2017). Silos, reused machine-buildings: a proposal for its transformation. IOP Conf. Ser.: Mater. Sci. Eng., 245 (10 pages).

Ghanbari, A.A., (2018). Industrial heritage in historical urban landscapes; the role of sugar factory in urban landscape of varamin. Manzar, Sci. J. landscape, 10(43): 26-33 (8 pages). (In Persian)

Gharaati, F.; Mahdavinejad, M.; Nadolny, A.; Bazazzadeh, H., (2023). Sustainable assessment of built heritage adaptive reuse practice: Iranian industrial heritage in the light of international charters. The Historic Environ.: Policy Practice (36 pages).

Gholami, Gh.; Heidari, Sh.; Hanachi, P., (2021). Conservation, adaptation and reuse of architectural heritage, an approach based on energy efficiency (determining the process and describing the measures). Memari-Va-Shahrsazi (HONAR-HA-YE-ZIBA), 26(1): 5-15 (11 pages). (In Persian)

Giuliani, F.; De Falco, A.; Landi, S.; Giorgio Bevilacqua, M.; Santini, L.; Pecori, S., (2018). Reusing grain silos from the 1930s in Italy. a multi-criteria decision analysis for the case of Arezzo. J. Cult. Heritage, 29: 145-159 (15 pages).

Hanachi, P.; Khani, S., (2021). Exploration and analyzing values in conservation of industrial heritage: a case study of the cement factory of Shahr-e-Rey. mmi, 11 (28): 19-32 (14 pages). (In Persian)

Hassanain, M.A.; Mahroos, M.S., (2023). A preliminary post-occupancy evaluation of the built environment in office buildings: a case study from Saudi Arabia. Property Manage., 41(4): 564-581

Heidari, S.; Hanachi, P.; Teymoortash, S., (2019). The Adaptive reuse of industrial heritage, an approach based on energy recycle. Naqshejahan, 9(1): 45-53 (9 pages). (In Persian)

Hua, Y.; Göçer, Ö.; Göçer, K., (2014). Spatial mapping of occupant satisfaction and indoor environment quality in a LEED platinum campus building. Build. Environ., 79: 124-137 (15 pages).

ICOMOS (International Council of Monuments and Sites). Venice charter for the conservation and restoration of monuments and sites; ICOMOS: Venice, Italy, 1964.

ICOMOS-TICCIH, (2011). Joint Principles for the conservation of industrial heritage sites, structures, areas and landscapes. Dublin. 28: 2011

Jailani,J.; Reed, R.; James, K., (2015). Examining the perception of tenants in sustainable office Buildings. Property Manage., 33(4): 386-404 (19 pages).

Jie,G., )2009). The protection and renewal of industrial heritage from a landscape architect’s perspective (a comparison between the center of Norrköping and Xu Jiahui park in Shanghai). Master’s Thesis, European Spatial Planning and Regional Development, Blekinge Instituted of Technology, Karlskrona, Sweden

Jopela, A.P. (2011). Traditional custodianship: a useful framework for heritage management in southern Africa? Conserv. Manage. Archaeol. Sites, 13(2-3): 103-122 (20 pages).

Kim, H.G.; Kim, S.S., (2020). Occupants’ awareness of and satisfaction with green building technologies in a certified office building. Sustainability, 12(5): 2109 (16 pages).

Kojo, I.; Nenonen, S., (2014). User experience in an academic coworking space: the case of Aalto university's design factory. In P. A. Jensen (Ed.), Cib facilieties management conference using facilities in and open world - creating value for all stakeholders. Joint CIB W070, W111 and W118 conferece, technical university of Denmark, Copenhagen 21: 341-353. Polyteknisk Boghandel og Forlag A/S.

Kojo, I.; Nenonen, S., (2016), Typologies for co-working spaces in Finland – what and how?’, Facilities, 34 (5/6): 302–313 (15 pages).

Koyaz, M.; Ünlü, A., (2022). Human-centred performance criteria for adaptive façade design: based on the results of a user experience survey. Build. Environ., 222: 109386. (18 pages).

Landorf,C., (2009). A framework for sustainable heritage management: a study of UK industrial heritage sites, Int. J. Heritage Stud., 15(6): 494-510 (18 pages).

Liu, F.; Zhao, Q.; Yang, Y., (2018). An approach to assess the value of industrial heritage based on Dempster–Shafer theory. J. Cult. Heritage. 32: 210-220 (11 pages).

Mahdavinejad, M.; Didehban, M.; Bazazzadeh, H., (2016). Contemporary architectural heritage and industrial indentity in historic districs, case study: Dezful. Journal of studies on Iranan Islamic city, 6(22): 41-50 (10 pages). (In Persian)

Mahdavinejad, M.; Talai, M.; Omidkhah, A., (2017). Sound-making and sustainable tourism, sample study: the heritage of industrial architecture in Islamic countries, International Congress of Leading Contemporary Architecture and Urbanism in Islamic Countries, Mashhad (10 pages). (In Persian)

Martinovic, A.; Ifko, S., (2018). Industrial heritage as a catalyst for urban regeneration in post-conflict cities, case study: Mostar, Bosnia, and Herzegovina. Cities, 74: 259-268 (10 pages).

Memud, M. W.; Tabibi, B., (2023). Effective design of coworking spaces to improve users’ experience in lagos state, Nigeria. Art and design review, 11: 80-103.

Meng. L.; Lin, B.G.; Zhang, H.Z.; Bu. R., (2023). Sustainable development evaluation on the landscape design of industrial heritage park: a case study of Tao Sichuan, China.J. Environ. Public Health., Jul 7:1564614. (14pages).

Merkel, J., 2015. Coworking in the city. Ephemera: Theory. Polit. Organ., 15(1): 121-139 (19pages).

Middlehurst, G.; Yao, R.; Jiang, L.; Deng, J.; Clements-Croome, D.; Adams, G., (2018). A preliminary study on post-occupancy evaluation of four office buildings in the UK based on the analytic hierarchy process. Int. Build. Int., 10(4): 234-246 (13pages).

Montgomery, J., (2007), Creative industry business incubators and managed workspaces: review of best practice. Plann. Pract. Res., 22(4): 601-617 (17 pages).

Micek, G., (2020). Studies of proximity in coworking spaces: The basic conceptual challenges. Eur. Spatial. Res. Policy., 27: 9-35 (27 pages).

Motalebi, G.; sedaghati, A., (2020). Forming a unique identity derived from cultural values hidden in the collective memories of citizens. Int. J. Hum. Capital Urban Manage., 5(3): 241-250 (10 pages).

Motalebi, G.; Sal Moslehian, A.; Hasanzadeh, E., (2021). The most effective indoor environmental quality factors related to worker satisfaction and performance: a case of the administrative office building at Ferdowsi university of Mashhad. Int. J. Occup. Saf. Ergon., 27(2): 358–370 (13 pages).

Nejadebrahimi, A.; Pourjafar, M.; Ansari, M.; Hanachi, P., (2014). Value and its relation with intervention approach in historical and cultural relics. Maremat-E Asar Baft-Haye Tarikhi-Farhangi, 3(6): 79-98 (20 pages). (In Persian)

Nili R.; Diba D.; Mahdavinejad M.; Shahcheraghi A., (2017). Evaluation and analysis of functionality of the sustainable regeneration pattern on the revival of contemporary industrial heritage. Int. J. Urban and Rural Manage., 16(48): 285-296 (12 pages). (In Persian)

Oevermann, H., (2015). Industrial heritage management in the context of urban planning. conference: Bigstuff (13 pages).

Pastore, L.; Andersen, M., (2019). Building energy certification versus user satisfaction with the indoor environment: Findings from a multi-site post-occupancy evaluation (POE) in Switzerland. Build. Environ., 150: 60-74 (15 pages).

Park, J.; Loftness, V.; Aziz, A., (2018). Post-occupancy evaluation and IEQ measurements from 64 office buildings: critical factors and thresholds for user satisfaction on thermal quality. Buildings, 8(11): 156 (24 pages).

Parkinson, A.T.; McKerrow, H.; Reid, R.; Wright, D., (2018). Evaluating positivist theories of occupant satisfaction: a statistical analysis. Build. Res. Inf., 46(4): 430-443 (14 pages).

Pei, Z.; Lin, B.; Liu, Y.; Zhu, Y., (2014). Comparative study on the indoor environment quality of green office buildings in China with a long-term field measurement and investigation. Build. Environ. 84: 80-88 (9 pages).

Pizarro-Reyes,L.; Díaz-Lazcano,V.; Zumelzu, A.; Prieto, A., (2022). Resilience and sustainability assessment of cultural heritage and built environment: the libertad pedestrian walkway in Valdivia. Chile J. Cult. Herit., 53(3): 154-164 (11 pages).

Potseshkovskaya, I.V.; Soroka, A.N., (2021). Revitalization of urban industrial areas based on sustainable development principles. E3S Web of Conferences. 266. 08012. 10.1051/e3sconf/202126608012.

Ranjkesh, R.; Fadaei Nezhad Bahramjerdi, S., (2020). Adaptation and reuse of industrial heritage as a continuation of urban identity; Tabriz Salambur factory and Igualada leather factory Spain. Naqshejahan, 10(1): 55-62 (8 pages). (In Persian)

Rezaei Ghahroodi, S.; Mahdavinejad, M., (2019). Reviewing and implementing international valuation criteria for industrial architectural heritage. Maremat-E Asar Baft-Haye Tarikhi-Farhangi, 9(17): 21-37 (17 pages). (In Persian)

Samadzadehyazdi S.; Ansari M.; Bemanian M., (2019). Environment sustainability through adaptive reuse (case study: industrial heritage of Iran). Naqshejahan, 9(1): 67-77 (11 pages). (In Persian)

Samimi, M.; Nouri, J., (2023). Optimized Zinc Uptake from the Aquatic Environment Using Biomass Derived from Lantana Camara L. Stem, Pollution, 9(4): 1925-1934 (10 pages).

Shahhosseini, G.; Moulaii, M., (2019). Explaining the role and place of industrial heritage in improving the quality characteristics of the hierarchy of the city entrances (case study: brick furnaces in the entrance of Hamedan). Naqshejahan ; 9(1): 13-22 (10 pages). (In Persian)

Spinuzzi, C., (2012). Working alone together coworking as emergent collaborative activity. J. Bus. Technol. and Commun., 26(4): 399 – 441 (43 pages).

Sulimowska-Ociepka, A.; (2021). Glass structures in post-industrial buildings and the role of the industrial heritage in shaping creative urban spaces. Civil Engineer. and Architecture 9(2): 281–292 (12 pages).

TICCIH (The International Committee for the Conservation of the Industrial Heritage). The Nizhny Tagil charter for the industrial heritage; TICCIH: Ceredigion, UK, 2003.

Wilkinson, S.J.; James, K.; Reed, R., (2009) Using building adaptation to deliver sustainability in Australia. Struct. Surv., 27(1): 46-61 (16 pages).

Weijs-Perrée, M.; Van de Koevering, J.; Appel-Meulenbroek, R.; Arentze, T., (2019). Analysing user preferences for co-working space characteristics. Build. Res. Inf., 47(5): 534-548 (15 pages).

Yuan, K.H.; Bentler, P.M., (2006). Structural equation modeling. handbook of statistics: psychometrics, Elsevier 20075, 10: 297-358 (62 pages).

LETTERS TO EDITOR

International Journal of Human Capital in Urban Management (IJHCUM) welcomes letters to the editor for the post-publication discussions and corrections which allows debate post publication on its site, through the Letters to Editor. Letters pertaining to manuscript published in IJHCUM should be sent to the editorial office of IJHCUM within three months of either online publication or before printed publication, except for critiques of original research. Following points are to be considering before sending the letters (comments) to the editor.

[1] Letters that include statements of statistics, facts, research, or theories should include appropriate references, although more than three are discouraged.

[2] Letters that are personal attacks on an author rather than thoughtful criticism of the author’s ideas will not be considered for publication.

[3] Letters can be no more than 300 words in length.

[4] Letter writers should include a statement at the beginning of the letter stating that it is being submitted either for publication or not.

[5] Anonymous letters will not be considered.

[6] Letter writers must include their city and state of residence or work.

[7] Letters will be edited for clarity and length.

Name *

Email Address *

Affiliation *

Comments *

Security Code *

International Journal of Human Capital in Urban Management

Assessing user’s satisfaction in innovation centers with industrial heritage renovation

References

References

Send comment about this article

Volume 9, Issue 2 - Serial Number 34
April 2024
Pages 279-298

Assessing user’s satisfaction in innovation centers with industrial heritage renovation

References

References

Send comment about this article

Volume 9, Issue 2 - Serial Number 34April 2024Pages 279-298

Volume 9, Issue 2 - Serial Number 34
April 2024
Pages 279-298