Environmental Worry Index-11: development, validity, and reliability

Oguntayo, R.; Agberotimi, S. F.; Ajao, P. O.; Oladele, O. T.; Olaseni, A. O.; Ajibewa, O. D.

doi:10.22034/IJHCUM.2023.01.03

Document Type : ORIGINAL RESEARCH ARTICLE

Authors

¹ Department of Psychology, University of Ilorin, Ilorin, Nigeria

² Department of Psychology, Faculty of Health Sciences, North-West University, Nigeria

³ Department of Psychology, University of Oye-Ekiti, Ekiti State, Nigeria

⁴ Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Clinical Sciences, College of Health Sciences, LAUTECH, Ogbomoso, Oyo State, Nigeria.

⁵ Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Clinical Sciences, College of Health Sciences, LAUTECH, Ogbomosho, Oyo State, Nigeria

https://doi.org/10.22034/IJHCUM.2023.01.03

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Environmental worry involve primarily the thoughts of some hazardous immediate and long-run side effects of degradation that happened to our ecological system. Despite the side effects of this phenomenon, psychometrics measuring environmental worry from the African context are insufficient. Therefore, the Environmental Worry Index (EWI-11) was developed to assess proximal and personal experiences of worry about climate change and environmental degradation.
METHODS: This study used a qualitative method among environmental professionals and students (between the ages of 18 to 65) in a university to generate the themes and the pool of items that were used to determine the Environmental Worry Index (EWI-11). Thereafter, 925 participants were purposively selected and assessed from Ibadan city through a cross-sectional survey to ascertain the validity and reliability of this new scale. The participants were selected in Ibadan city, Nigeria. The software of the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (Version 26.0) was used for all analyses.
FINDINGS: Using exploratory factor analysis, the construct validity and Varimax rotation showed that the scale has two components (KMO = 0.892, df=91, p.00), thus showing a strong validity. The reliability dimensions and subscales have meritorious reliability (Proximal, α =.894, and Personal experience of worry, α =.671). The overall Cronbach’s Alpha was 0.894.
CONCLUSION: The EWI-11 is adequate for measuring environmental worry and could be useful for experts in mental and environmental research and practice. EWI-11 is therefore recommended as a reliable and valid screening tool for environmental worry and may be acceptable across Africa and other countries as well.

Keywords

Main Subjects

Urban health, safety and environment (HSE)

OPEN ACCESS

©2023 The author(s). This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third-party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit:

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

PUBLISHER NOTE

IJHCUM Publisher remains neutral concerning jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

CITATION METRICS & CAPTURES

CURRENT PUBLISHER

Tehran Municipality: Tehran Urban Research and Planning Center

References

American Psychological Association, (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, 5th ed. Author. Arlington, VA.

Ayandele, O.; Kolawole, S.K., Ramos-Vera, C.A.; Oguntayo, R.; Gandi, J.C.; Iorfa, S.K.; Ottu, I.F.A.; Dangiwa, A.L.; Olapegba, P.O., (2021). The Infectious Diseases Preventive Health Behavior Scale (ID-PHBS): Development and validation with an African Sample. SSRN (17 Pages).

Barlow, D.H., (2004). Anxiety and its disorders: The nature and treatment of anxiety and panic. Guilford press.

Bowler, R. M.; Schwarzer, R., (1991). Environmental anxiety: Assessing emotional distress and concerns after toxin exposure. Anxiety Res., 4(2): 167-180 (14 Pages).

Cianconi, P.; Betrò, S.; Janiri, L., (2020). The impact of climate change on mental health: a systematic descriptive review. Front. psychiat., 11: 74 (15 Pages).

Clayton, S.; Manning, C.; Krygsman, K.; Speiser, M., (2017). Mental health and our changing climate: Impacts, implications, and guidance. American Psychological Association and ecoAmerica.Washington, DC.

Clemens, V.; von Hirschhausen, E.; Fegert, J. M., (2020). Report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change: implications for the mental health policy of children and adolescents in Europe—a scoping review. Europ. Child Adolesc. psychiat., 1-13 (13 Pages).

Diffenbaugh, N.S.; Scherer, M., (2011). Observational and model evidence of the global emergence of permanent, unprecedented heat in the 20th and 21st centuries. Climatic Change, 107(3): 615-624 (10 Pages).

Fetzek, S.; Mazo, J., (2014). Climate, scarcity and conflict. Survival, 56(5): 143-170 (28 Pages).

Higginbotham, N.; Connor, L.; Albrecht, G.; Freeman, S.; Agho, K., (2006). Validation of an environmental distress scale. EcoHealth, 3(4): 245-254 (10 Pages).

Holaway, R.M.; Rodebaugh, T.L.; Heimberg, R.G.; Davey, G.; Wells, A., (2006). Worry and its Psychological Disorders: Theory, assessment and treatment. Wiley Library.

Hogg, T.L.; Stanley, S.K.; O'Brien, L.V.; Wilson, M.S.; Watsford, C.R., (2021). The Hogg Eco-Anxiety Scale: Development and validation of a multidimensional scale. Glob. Environ. Change., 1(71): 102391 (34 Pages).

Kelley, M.L.; Self‐Brown, S., Le, B.; Bosson, J.V.; Hernandez, B.C.; Gordon, A.T., (2010).

Predicting posttraumatic stress symptoms in children following Hurricane Katrina: A prospective analysis of the effect of parental distress and parenting practices. J. Traum. Stress, 23(5): 582-590 (9 Pages).

Kline, P., (2013). Handbook of psychological testing. Routledge.

Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, (2014). Climate Change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. Part A: Global and Sectoral Aspects; Contribution of Working Group II to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press: New York, NY, USA.

Lin, H.; Chen, C.; Xirasagar, S.; Lee, H., (2018). Seasonality and climatic associations with violent and nonviolent suicide: a population-based study. Neuropsychobiology, 57(12): 32-7 (6 Pages).

Line, M.R.; Wolf, A.S.; Zhang, X.; Knutson, H.; Kammer, J.A.; Ellison, E.; Deroo, P., Crisp, D.; Yung, Y.L., (2013). A systematic retrieval analysis of secondary eclipse spectra. I. A comparison of atmospheric retrieval techniques. The Astrophysical J., 775(2): 137 (22 Pages).

Norris, M.; Lecavalier, L., (2010). Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in developmental disability psychological research. J. Aut. Dev.. Disorder., 40(1): 8-20 (12 Pages).

Oguntayo, R.; Olaseni A.O.; Kehinde, M.O.; Osinowo, H.O.; Yakubu, I.I., (2020). A Brief Propensity Index for Conduct Disorder (BPI-CD): Development, validity and reliability. J. Profess. Counsel. Psychother. Res., (3)1: 205-218 (14 Pages).

Opayemi, A.S.; Oguntayo R.; Popoola, A.O.; Alabi, A., (2020). Psychosocial factors as determinants of littering prevention behavior. Int. J. Hum. Capital Urban Manage., 5(1): 59-68 (10 Pages).

Searle, K.; Gow, K., (2010). Do concerns about climate change lead to distress? Int. J. Clim. Change Strat. Manage., (17 Pages).

Shrestha, N., (2021). Factor analysis as a tool for survey analysis. Am. J. Appl. Mathemat. Stat., 9(1): 4-11 (8 pages)

Stewart, A.E., (2021). Psychometric properties of the climate change worry scale. Int. J. Environ. Res. Pub. Health., 18: 494 (22 Pages).

Strona, G.; Bradshaw, C.J., (2018). Co-extinctions annihilate planetary life during extreme environmental change. Sci. Report., 8(1): 1-12 (12 Pages).

Worthington, R.L.; Whittaker, T.A., (2006). Scale development research: A content analysis and recommendations for best practices. Counsel. Psychol., 34(6): 806-838 (32 Pages).

UNICEF, (2022). Making Nigeria open defecation free by 2025: A national road map. The roadmap provides a guide towards achieving an open defecation-free country using different approaches. UNICEF Nigeria (82 Pages).

United Nation Climate Change. (2020). Climate Change Is an Increasing Threat to Africa. Nairobi Platform.

Van der Linden, S., (2017). Determinants and measurement of climate change risk perception, worry, and concern. The Oxford Encyclopedia of Climate Change Communication. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.

Van der Linden, S., (2014). On the relationship between personal experience, affect and risk. Perception: the case of climate change. Europ. J. Soc. Psych., 44(5): 430-440 (11 pages).

Wahab, B.; Popoola, A., (2018). Climate-Induced problems and adaptation strategies of urban farmers in Ibadan. Ethiop. J. Environ. Stud. Manage., 11(1): 31-42 (12 pages).

World Health Organization. (2022). Why mental health is a priority for action on climate change. Geneva.

LETTERS TO EDITOR

International Journal of Human Capital in Urban Management (IJHCUM) welcomes letters to the editor for the post-publication discussions and corrections which allows debate post publication on its site, through the Letters to Editor. Letters pertaining to manuscript published in IJHCUM should be sent to the editorial office of IJHCUM within three months of either online publication or before printed publication, except for critiques of original research. Following points are to be considering before sending the letters (comments) to the editor.

[1] Letters that include statements of statistics, facts, research, or theories should include appropriate references, although more than three are discouraged.

[2] Letters that are personal attacks on an author rather than thoughtful criticism of the author’s ideas will not be considered for publication.

[3] Letters can be no more than 300 words in length.

[4] Letter writers should include a statement at the beginning of the letter stating that it is being submitted either for publication or not.

[5] Anonymous letters will not be considered.

[6] Letter writers must include their city and state of residence or work.

[7] Letters will be edited for clarity and length.

Name *

Email Address *

Affiliation *

Comments *

Security Code *

International Journal of Human Capital in Urban Management

Environmental Worry Index-11: development, validity, and reliability

References

References

Send comment about this article

Volume 8, Issue 1 - Serial Number 29
January 2023
Pages 31-42

Environmental Worry Index-11: development, validity, and reliability

References

References

Send comment about this article

Volume 8, Issue 1 - Serial Number 29January 2023Pages 31-42

Volume 8, Issue 1 - Serial Number 29
January 2023
Pages 31-42