Document Type : CASE STUDY


Department of Geography and Urban Planning, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran


Quality of urban environment as a subset of quality of life now represents the search for happiness and personal satisfaction in urban environment and is a broad concept which is concerned with the overall well-being in urban environment. The purpose of this study was to investigating the quality of urban environment according to the 5 urban landscape indicators; Land use, Green space, Population and Floor density, Accessibility and physical quality in Noor Town of Tabriz. In order to achieve this goal, the two-step research method has been used. The first step was field observation and conduction an organized interview with the citizens and the next step was the implementation of the results on the map using Geographical Information System analysis. The results of the research showed that the highest quality of urban environment related to green space and people are satisfied with the availability of green space in Noor Town. In contrast, the lowest quality of urban environment was related to the aspects of land use, such as the existence of wastelands in the southern parts of the study area and existence some industrial sites as air pollution sources near to the study area.


Main Subjects

Ahmad, Y.; Hamid, S.; Afgani, E.Y.; Yusof, N., (2014). Quality of life amongst agropolitan participant project: A Malaysian experience. Proc. Soc. Behav. Sci., 153 (16): 479 – 490 (12 pages).

Aklanoğlu, F.; Erdoğan, E., (2012). Improvement quality of life for an Anatolian traditional settlement: Konya-Sille Case. Proc. Soc. Behav. Sci., 35: 420–430 (11 pages).

Ana-Maria, V., (2015). Study on promoting quality of life through physical exercise. Proc. Soc. Behav. Sci., 180, 1439–1443 (5 pages).

Ballas, D.; Tranmer, M., (2012). Happy people or happy places? A multilevel modeling approach to the analysis of happiness and well-being. Int. Region. Sci. Rev., 35(1): 70–102 (33 pages).

Biagi, B.; Ladu, M. G.; Meleddu, M., (2014). Urban Quality of Life and Capabilities: An Experimental Study; Ecol. Econ., 150: 137-152 (16 pages).

Constantinescu, M., (2013). Educating young people for quality of life improvement. Proc. Soc. Behav. Sci., 93: 395–399 (5 pages).

Costanza, R.; Fisher, B.; Ali, S.; Beer, C.; Bond, L.; Boumans,; Gayer, D. E., (2007). Quality of life: An approach integrating opportunities, human needs, and subjective well-being. Ecol. Econ., 61(2-3): 267-276 (10 pages).

Cummins, R. A.; Eckersley, R.; Pallant, J.; Van Vugt, J.; Misajon, R., (2003). Developing a national index of subjective wellbeing: The Australian Unity Wellbeing Index. Soc. Indic. Res., 64(2): 159-190 (32 pages).

Easterlin, R.A.; (2003). Explaining happiness. P. NATL Acad. Sci.: 11176–11183 (7 pages).

Eusuf, M.A.; Mohit, M.A.; Eusuf, M.R.; Ibrahim, M., (2014). Impact of outdoor environment to the quality of life. Proc.  Soc. Behav. Sci., 153: 639–654 (16 pages).

Florek, M., (2011). No place like home: Perspectives on place attachment and impacts on city management. J. of Town City Manage., 1(4): 346–354 (8 pages).

Ge, J.; Hokao, K., (2006). Research on residential lifestyles in Japanese cities from the viewpoints of residential preference, residential choice and residential satisfaction. Landsc. Urban Plan., 78(3): 165–178 (14 pages).

Ghanbri, A.; Shojaeivand, B., (2015). People’s Attitudes towards Participation, Place Attachment and Urban Tourism Development in Tabriz, Iran. Online international. Interdi. Res. J., 5(1): 68- 81 (14 pages).

Haas, B.K., (1999). A multidisciplinary concept analysis of quality of life. West. J. Nurs. Res., 21: 728–742 (15 pages).

Hanifah, N. A.; Hashim, R., (2012). The Madrid Protocol 1991 and its environmental impacts towards the quality of life. Proc. Soc. Behav. Sci., 35: 398–403 (6 pages).

Hernández, B.; Carmen Hidalgo, M.; Salazar-Laplace, M.E. Hess, S., (2007). Place attachment and place identity in natives and non-natives. J. Environ. Psycho. 27(4): 310–319 (10 pages).

Heydari, R.; Shojaeivand, B., (2017). New urbanism approach and urban space in mega cities. Int. J.  Hum. Capital Urban Manage., 2 (4): 303-308 (6 pages).

Insch, A.; Florek, M., (2008). A great place to live, work and play: Conceptualizing place satisfaction in the case of a city's residents. J. of Place Manage. Dev., 1(2): 138–149 (12 pages).

Karim, H.A., (2012). Low cost housing environment: compromising quality of life? Procedia. Soc. Behav., 35: 44-53 (10 pages).

Keles, R., (2012). The quality of life and the environment. Proc. Soc. Behav. Sci., 35: 23– 32 (10 pages).

Ludíková, L..; Tomalová, P., (2013). Research on quality of life of workers in school counseling centers for the visually and hearing impaired in the Czech Republic. Proc. Soc. Behav. Sci., 106: 2269–2274 (6 pages).

Ludíková, L.; Tomalová, P., (2013). Research on quality of life of workers in school counseling centers for the visually and hearing impaired in the Czech Republic. Proc. Soc. Behav. Sci., 106: 2269-2274 (6 pages).

Macke, J.; Casagrande, R.M.; Sarate, J.A.R.; Silva, K.A., (2018). Smart city and quality of life: Citizens’ perception in a Brazilian case study. J. Cleaner Prod., 182: 717-726 (10 pages).

Marans, R.W., (2012). Quality of urban life studies: an overview and implications for environment-behaviour research. Proc. Soc. Behav. Sci, 35: 9–22 (14 pages).

Mohit, M. A., (2013). Quality of life in natural and built environment – an introductory analysis. Proc. Soc. Behav. Sci., 101: 33–43 (11 pages).

Sham, R.; Hussein, M. Z.S.; Ismail, H. N., (2013). A review of social structure, crime and quality of life as women travelers in Malaysian Cities. Proc. Soc. Behav. Sci., 101: 307–317 (11 pages).

Shucksmith, M.; Cameron, S.; Merridew, T.; Pichler, F., (2009). Urban-Rural Differences in Quality of Life Across the European Union. Reg. Stud., 43, 10: 1275-1289 (15 pages).

Smith, T.; Nelischer, M.; Perkins, N., (1997). Quality of an urban community: A framework for understanding the relationship between quality and physical form. Landsc. Urban Plan., 39(2): 229–241 (13 pages).

Turkoglu, H., (2015). Sustainable development and quality of urban life. Proc. Soc. Behav. Sci., 202: 10 – 14 (5 pages).

Zenker, S.; Rütter, N., (2014). Is satisfaction the key? The role of citizen satisfaction, place attachment and place brand attitude on positive citizenship behavior. Cities, 38: 11–17 (7 pages).

Zenker, S.; Petersen, S.; Aholt, A., (2013). The citizen satisfaction index (CSI): Evidence for a four basic factor model in a German sample. Cities, 31: 156–164 (8 pages).

Wikipedia, (2019). Urban density and Floor area ratio.


International Journal of Human Capital in Urban Management (IJHCUM) welcomes letters to the editor for the post-publication discussions and corrections which allows debate post publication on its site, through the Letters to Editor. Letters pertaining to manuscript published in IJHCUM should be sent to the editorial office of IJHCUM within three months of either online publication or before printed publication, except for critiques of original research. Following points are to be considering before sending the letters (comments) to the editor.

[1] Letters that include statements of statistics, facts, research, or theories should include appropriate references, although more than three are discouraged.

[2] Letters that are personal attacks on an author rather than thoughtful criticism of the author’s ideas will not be considered for publication.

[3] Letters can be no more than 300 words in length.

[4] Letter writers should include a statement at the beginning of the letter stating that it is being submitted either for publication or not.

[5] Anonymous letters will not be considered.

[6] Letter writers must include their city and state of residence or work.

[7] Letters will be edited for clarity and length.