New urbanism approach and urban space in mega cities

Heydari, R.; Shojaeivand, B.

doi:10.22034/ijhcum.2017.02.04.006

|
|
|
How to cite
RIS EndNote BibTeX APA MLA Harvard Vancouver
|
Share

	New urbanism approach and urban space in mega cities
Article 6, Volume 2, Issue 4, Autumn 2017, Page 303-308 PDF (173.7 K)
Document Type: CASE STUDY
DOI: 10.22034/ijhcum.2017.02.04.006
Authors
R. Heydari; B. Shojaeivand
Geography and Urban Planning Department, Faculty of Planning and Environmental Sciences, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran
Receive Date: 08 June 2017, Revise Date: 05 August 2017, Accept Date: 11 September 2017
Abstract
New Urbanism design principles have been adopted for many urban planning efforts in recent years. The purpose of this paper is studding the structure and space of Shahid Beheshti Square as one of the most important and old squares of Tabriz from the view of new urbanism principals. In order to reaching this purpose the data were collected through a questionnaire distributed among peoples that attend in Shahid Beheshti square and an Exploratory Factor Analysis using Principal Component Analysis was carried out and to reaching to the accurate data interview used as supplementary method. The results show that among the new urbanism design principles, Increased Density is the only principle that observed in study area and Green Space, Mixed Housing and Connectivity are the principles that have the low factor load. Actually the urban space in square is not designed based on new urbanism principles and failed to satisfy the satisfaction of the people to the use of space.
Keywords
Urban Space; New Urbanism; Factor analysis; Tabriz
Main Subjects
Urban architecture, design, development and planning


References
Amaratunga, D.; Baldry, D.; Sarshar, M.; Newton, R., (2002). Quantitative and qualitative research in the built environment: application of “mixed” research approach. Work Study, 51(1): 17-31 (15 pages). Bohl, Ch. C., (2000). New urbanism and the city: Potential applications and implications for distressed inner-city neighborhoods. Hous. Policy Debate, 11(4): 761-801 (41 pages). Bothwell, S.E.; Gindroz, R.; Lang, R.E., (1998). Restoring community through traditional neighborhood design: a case study of Diggs Town public housing. Hous. Policy Debate, 9(1): 89-114 (26 pages). Carmona, M. T., (2010). Public places- Uraban spaces: The dimensions of urabn design. Architecture Press, New York. CNU and HUD., (2000). Principles for inner city neighborhood design. (38 pages). Deitrick, S.; Ellis, C., (2000). New Urbanism and inner-city neighborhood revitalization in Pittsburgh. In 96^th Annual Meeting of the Association of American Geographers, Pittsburgh. 4-8 (5 pages). Duany, A.; Plater-Zyberk, E.; Speck, J., (2001). Suburban nation: The rise of sprawl and the decline of the American dream. North Point Publication, San Francisco. Ford, L.R., (1999). Lynch revisited: New urbanism and theories of good city form. Cities, 16(4): 247-257 (11 pages). Gehl, J., (1987). Life between Buildings. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York. Ghanbari, A.; Shojaeivand, B., (2015). People’s Attitudes towards Participation, Place Attachment and Urban Tourism Development in Tabriz, Iran. Online Int. Interdiscip. Res. J., 5(1): 68-81 (14 pages). Ghauri, P.N.; Gronhaug, K., (2005). Research methods in business studies: A practical guide. 3rd (edn.), Pearson Education, Harlow. Kelbaugh, D., (2001). Three urbanisms and the public realm. In 3^rd International Space Syntax Symposium. Khakzand, M; Babaei, S., (2016). How traditional symbols can be used as inspiration source in shaping the urban architecture?. Int. J. Hum. Capital Urban Manage., 1(2): 73-82 (10 pages). Kim, J., (2000). Creating community: Does the Kentlands live up to its goals? [The promise of New Urbanism]. Places, 13(2): 48-55 (8 pages). Leccese, M.; McCormick, K., (2000). Charter of the new urbanism. McGraw-Hill Professional. Morris, W., (2008). New urbanism: An overview and Australian examples. Australian council for new urbanism. Moudon, A.V., (2000). Proof of goodness: A substantive basis for new urbanism [The promise of new urbanism]. Places, 13(2): 38-43 (6 pages). Muschamp, H., (1996). Can new urbanism find room for the old?. New York Times. Newman, O., (1996). Creating Defensible Space. New Brunswick, Rutgers University, Center for Urban Policy Research, Center for urban policy research, Rutgers University, NJ. Plas, J.M.; Lewis, S.E., (1996). Environmental factors and sense of community in a planned town. Am. J. community Psychol., 24(1): 109-143 (35 pages). Rahnama, M.R.; Roshani, P.; Hassani, A.; Hossienpour, S.A., (2012). Use principles of new urbanism approach in designing sustainable urban spaces. Int. J. Appl. Sci. Technol., 2(7): 195-203 (9 pages). Sadeghi, A.R.; Panahi, N., (2016). Role of environmental rights in the urban design of public places. Int. J. Hum. Capital Urban Manage., 1(3): 169-182 (14 pages). Statistical Yearbook (2014). According to the Censuses of 2011. Available at: http://www.amar.org.ir Talen, E., (2002). The social goals of new urbanism. Hous. Policy Debate, 13(1): 165-188 (24 pages). Talen, E., (2005). New Urbanism and American Planning: The Conflict of Cultures. Routledge, London. Wang, Y.; Pfister, R.E.; Morais, D.B., (2006). Residents’ attitudes toward tourism development: A case study of Washington, NC. In Proceedings of the Northeastern Recreation Research Symposium. 411-418 (8 pages). Whyte, W.H., (1988). City: Rediscovering the center. Bantam Doubleday Dell publishing group, New York.
Statistics Article View: 318 PDF Download: 132