Document Type : REVIEW PAPER


1 Department of Environment and Sustainable Development, Municipality of Tehran

2 Department of Plan and Budget of Municipality of Tehran, Tehran, Iran

3 Waste Management Organization of Municipality of Tehran, Tehran, Iran

4 Department of Environment and Sustainable Development, Municipality of Tehran, Tehran, Iran


Recently, literature around the theme of collaborative management research has grown considerably. According to the definition of collaborative management research, two components are connected to each other in this context; managers of organizations and academic researchers. In literature, many authors claim that the relationship between these two components could lead to significant advantages for both of them. On the one hand, managers can learn more about new methods of handling complex systems, and on the other hand, researchers can have a chance to recognize new theories and develop their knowledge through this collaboration. Some authors argue that collaborative research not only leads to an increase in knowledge production, but also encourages knowledge sharing among the participating researchers. Therefore, knowledge production is an important issue in collaborative management research. In literature, many authors claim that the quality of knowledge production through collaborative research is higher than in non-collaborative cases. With the view of making collaborative management research more valuable, knowledge production could play an important role in three issues related to enriching collaborative management research; namely rigor, reflection and relevance. The issue of knowledge production has been a controversial and much disputed subject within the field of collaborative management research. In this paper, some studies are reviewed in order to find out the effect of collaborative management research on knowledge production. Moreover, the pattern of collaboration in knowledge production is also discussed.


Main Subjects

Aeberhard, A.; Rist, S., (2009). Transdisciplinary co-production of knowledge in the development of organic agriculture in Switzerland. Ecol. Econ., 68(4): 1171-1181 (11 pages).

Ayre, M.; Wallis, P.; Daniell, K., (2018). Learning from collaborative research on sustainably managing fresh water: implications for ethical research–practice engagement. Ecol. Soc., 23(1): 6

Cohen, S., (2019). The role of universities in setting the knowledge economy agenda.

Degama, N.; RSTA Elias, S.; Peticca-Harris, A., (2019). The good academic: re-imagining good research in organization and management studies. Qualitative research in organizations and management: Int. J., 14(1): 2-9 (8 pages).

Coghlan, D.; Shani, A.B.; Dahm, P.C., (2019). Knowledge production in organization development: An Interiority-based Perspective. J. Change Manage., 1-18 (18 pages).

Dingsayr, T., (2019). Knowledge management in medium-sized software consulting companies: An investigation of intranet-based knowledge management tools for knowledge cartography and knowledge repositories for learning software organisations. arXiv preprint arXiv:1903.11854.

Davis, M.H.; Guthrie, J.T., (2015). Measuring reading comprehension of content area texts using an assessment of knowledge organization.  J. of Educational Research, 108(2): 148-164 (17 pages).

gurukkal, R., (2019). History and theory of knowledge production: An introductory outline.

Hamdoun, M.; Jabbour, C.J.C.; Othman, H.B., (2018). Knowledge transfer and organizational innovation: Impacts of quality and environmental management. J. Cleaner Prod., 193: 759-770 (12 pages)

Hassard, J.; Morris, J., (2018). Contrived competition and manufactured uncertainty: Understanding managerial job insecurity narratives in large corporations. Work, Employment Soc., 32(3): 564-580 (16 pages).

Heaton, J.; Day, J.; Britten, N., (2015). Collaborative research and the co-production of knowledge for practice: an illustrative case study. Implement. Sci., 11(1): 20.

Kim, S.S., (2019). The role of knowledge and organizational support in explaining managers’ active risk management behavior. J. Enterp. Infor. Manage., 32(2): 345-363 (19 pages).

Iordanou, K., (2019). Involving patients in research? Responsible research and innovation in small-and medium-sized European health care enterprises. Camb. Q. Healthc. Ethic., 28(1): 144-152 (9 pages).

Kolodny, H.; Halpern, N., (2008). From collaborative design to collaborative research: A sociotechnical journey. Handb. Coll. Manage. Res., 261-274 (14 pages).

Leino, H.; Santaoja, M.; Laine, M., (2018). Researchers as knowledge brokers: Translating knowledge or co-producing legitimacy? An urban infill case from Finland. Int. Plan. Stud., 23(2):119-129 (11 pages).

Literat, I.; Conover, A.; Herbert-Wasson, E.; Kirsch Page, K.; Riina-Ferrie, J.; Stephens, R.; Thanapornsangsuth, S.; Vasudevan, L., (2018). Toward multimodal inquiry: opportunities, challenges and implications of multimodality for research and scholarship. High. Educ. Res. Deve., 37(3): 565-578 (14 pages).

Martensson, P.; Fors, U.; Wallin, S.B.; Zander, U.; Nilsson, G.H., (2016). Evaluating research: A multidisciplinary approach to assessing research practice and quality. Res. Policy, 45(3): 593-603 (11 pages).

Mazur, A.; Kubai, O., (2019). Scientific-methodological and practical principles of regional economic systems integration. Baltic J. Econ. Stud., 5(2): 117-123 (7 pages).

Mirvis, P.H., (2007). Academic-practitioner learning forums. Handb. Coll. Manage. Res., 201.

Mügge, L.; Montoya, C.; Emejulu, A.; Weldon, S.L., (2018). Intersectionality and the politics of knowledge production. Eur. J. Polit. Gender, 1(1-2): 17-36 (20 pages).

Nave, A.; Ferreira, J., (2019). Corporate social responsibility strategies: Past research and future challenges. Corp. Soc. Resp. Environ. Manage.

Newman, J.; Cherney, A.; Head, B.W., (2016). Do policy makers use academic research? Reexamining the “two communities” theory of research utilization. Pub. Admin. Rev., 76(1): 24-32(9 pages).

Nordentoft, H.M.; Olesen, B.R., (2018). A critical reflexive perspective on othering in collaborative knowledge production. Qual. Res. J., 18(1): 55-66 (11 pages).

Olascoaga, E.; Kur, E.D., (2007). Dynamic strategic alignment. Handb. Coll. Manage. Res., 243.

Onyancha, O.B.; Maluleka, J.R., (2011). Knowledge production through collaborative research in sub-Saharan Africa: how much do countries contribute to each other’s knowledge output and citation impact? Scientometrics, 87(2): 315-336 (22 pages).

Oygür, I., (2018). The machineries of user knowledge production. Desgn Stud., 54: 23-49 (27 pages).

Quintanilha, T.L., Cardoso, G., (2018). The impact factor as a legitimator of the scientific knowledge produced: a review of the literature. JANUS. NET. E- J. Int. Relat., 9: 32-44 (13pages).

Radaelli, G.; Guerci, M.; Cirella, S.; Shani, A.B., (2014). Intervention research as management research in practice: learning from a case in the fashion design industry. Brit. J. Manage. 25(2): 35-351(17 pages).

Rosskam, E., (2018). Using participatory action research methodology to improve worker health. In Unhealthy Work, 211-228 (18 pages).

Senge, P.M.; Smith, B.; Kruschwitz, N.; Laur, J.; Schley, S., (2008). The necessary revolution: How individuals and organizations are working together to create a sustainable world. Crown Business.

Shani, A.B.; Mohrman, S.A.; Pasmore, W.A.; Stymne, B.; Adler, N. eds., (2007). Handbook of collaborative management research. Sage Publications.

Sidani, Y.; Reese, S., (2018). A journey of collaborative learning organization research: Interview with Victoria Marsick and Karen Watkins.  Lear. Org., 25(3): 199-209 (11 pages).

Simon, D.; Palmer, H.; Riise, J.; Smit, W.; Valencia, S., (2018). The challenges of transdisciplinary knowledge production: from unilocal to comparative research. Environ. Urbanization, 30(2): 481-500 (20 pages).

Sooryamoorthy, R., (2009). Collaboration and publication: How collaborative are scientists in South Africa? Scientometrics, 80(2): 419-439 (21 pages).

Stebbins, M.W.; Valenzuela, J.L.; Shani, A.B.; Mohrman, S.A.; Pasmore, W.A.; Stymne, B.; Adler, N., (2008). Collaborative research in pharmacy operations: The Kaiser-Permanente experience. Handb. Coll. Manage. Res., 487-508 (22 pages).

Stebbins, M.W.; Valenzuela, J.L.; Coget, J.F., (2009). Long-term insider action research: Three decades of work at Kaiser Permanente. Res. Org. change Dev., 37-75 (39 pages). Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Werr, A.; Greiner, L., (2008). Collaboration and the production of management knowledge in research, consulting, and management practice. Handb. Coll. Manage. Res., 93-117(25 pages).

Wine, O.; Spiers, J.; van Manen, M.; Burns, K.K.; Vargas, A.O.; Domino Project, (2018). Collaborative research, capacity building and knowledge translation development for research on adverse birth outcomes and the environment. Pediat. Child Health, 23 (suppl_1): e39-e39


International Journal of Human Capital in Urban Management (IJHCUM) welcomes letters to the editor for the post-publication discussions and corrections which allows debate post publication on its site, through the Letters to Editor. Letters pertaining to manuscript published in IJHCUM should be sent to the editorial office of IJHCUM within three months of either online publication or before printed publication, except for critiques of original research. Following points are to be considering before sending the letters (comments) to the editor.

[1] Letters that include statements of statistics, facts, research, or theories should include appropriate references, although more than three are discouraged.

[2] Letters that are personal attacks on an author rather than thoughtful criticism of the author’s ideas will not be considered for publication.

[3] Letters can be no more than 300 words in length.

[4] Letter writers should include a statement at the beginning of the letter stating that it is being submitted either for publication or not.

[5] Anonymous letters will not be considered.

[6] Letter writers must include their city and state of residence or work.

[7] Letters will be edited for clarity and length.