Document Type : CASE STUDY


Traffic Department, District 13, Municipality of Tehran, Tehran, Iran


Dealing with the tension between explorative and exploitative activities is a key issue for firms. Literature suggests that ambidexterity allows firms to manage this issue properly and provides firms with specific competitive advantages. This study was conducted aiming at investigating the impact of Human Resources measures on organizational ambidexterity in smart city projects. Method used is descriptive - survey. The statistical society of the study consisted of 460 employees of District 13 of Municipality of Tehran, out of them 210 subjects were identified as the sample volume and were selected by simple random sampling method. The tool used for measurement was a standard questionnaire whose reliability was estimated as Alpha 0.924. In order to analyze the data, descriptive and inferential statistical indicators especially structural equation modeling by Amus software, K-S test and Bartlett were used. The results of structural equation modeling showed that the explorative Human Resources have significant effect on exploration (Cr=14.533, B=0.95) of smart city projects, and exploitative Human Resources have significant effect on exploitation (Cr=12.204, B=0.81) of smart city projects In the other words, strengthening the measures of Human Resources and its various dimensions increases the ambidexterity of smart city projects.


Main Subjects

Ahmad, S.; Schroeder, R.G., (2003). The impact of human resource management practices on operational performance: recognizing country and industry differences. J. Oper. Manage., 21(1): 19-43 (25 pages).

BolíVar-Ramos, M.T.; GarcíA-Morales, V.J.; GarcíA-SáNchez, E., (2012). Technological distinctive competencies and organizational learning: Effects on organizational innovation to improve firm performance. J. Eng. Technol. Manage., 29(3): 331-357 (27 pages).

Caird, S., (2018). City approaches to smart city evaluation and reporting: case studies in the United Kingdom, Urban Res. Practice, 11(2): 159-179 (21 pages).

Campanella, F.; Del Giudice , M.; Thrassou , A.; Vrontis , D. (2016). Ambidextrous organizations in the banking sector: an empirical verification of banks’ performance and conceptual development. Int. J. Hum. Resour. Manage., 27(1): 1-31 (31 pages).

Chiang, H.H.; Han, T.S.; Chuang, J.S., (2011). The relationship between high‐commitment HRM and knowledge‐sharing behavior and its mediators, Int. J. Manpower., 32(5/6): 604-622 (19 pages).  

Domínguez -Falcón, C.; Domínguez -Falcón, C.; Martín-Santana, J.D.; Martín-Santana, J.D.; De Saá -Pérez, P.; De Saá -Pérez, P., (2016). Human resources management and performance in the hotel industry: The role of the commitment and satisfaction of managers versus supervisors. Int. J. Contemporary Hospitality Manage., 28(3), 490-515 (26 pages).

Duncan, R.B., (1976). The ambidextrous organization: Designing dual structures for innovation.  Manage. Organiz., 1: 167-188 (22 pages).

Ebrahimpour, M.; Moradi, M.; Mobini, Y., (2015). Organizational ambidexterity impact on the performance of the manufacturing industry: study the role of environmental dynamics. Assoc. Manage. Sci., Iran, 9(36):  53-76 (24 pages).

Ferraris, A., (2014). Rethinking the literature on multiple embeddedness and subsidiary specific advantages. Multinational Bus. Rev., 22(1): 15-33 (19 pages).

Ferraris, A.; Erhardt , N.; Bresciani , S., (2017). Ambidextrous work in smart city project alliances: unpacking the role of human resource management systems. Int. J. Hum. Resour. Manage., 6(6): 1-22 (22 pages).

Ferraris, A.; Gabriele, S.; Bresciani, S.; Carayannis, E.G., (2018). HR practices for explorative and exploitative alliances in smart cities: Evidences from smart city managers' perspective. Manage. Decis., 56(6): 1183-1197 (15 pages).

Gibson, C. B.; Birkinshaw, J., (2004). The antecedents, consequences, and mediating role of organizational ambidexterity. Academy Manage. J., 47(2): 209-226 (18 pages).

Harrison, C.; Eckman, B.; Hamilton, R.; Hartswick , P.; Kalagnanam , J.; Paraszczak ,J.; Williams, P., (2010). Foundations for smarter cities. IBM J. Res. Develop., 54(4):  1-16 (16 pages).

Harrison, C.; Donnelly, I.A., (2012). A Theory of Smart Cities. Proceedings of the 55th Annual Meeting of the ISSS-2011, Hull, 17-22 (6 pages).

Junni , P.; Sarala, R.; Taras , V.; and Tarba , S.; (2013). Organizational ambidexterity and performance: a meta-analysis. Academy Manage. Perspect., 27(4): 299-312.  (14 pages).

Khanna, P., (2015). Urbanisation,Technology,and the Growth of Smart Cities, Asian Management In - sights , 2(2): 52-59 (8 pages).

Lavie, D.; Stettner , U.; Tushman, M.L., (2010). Exploration and exploitation within and across organizations. Academy Manage. Annals, 4(1): 109-155 (37 pages).

Lengnick -Hall, M.; Lengnick -Hall, C.; Andrade, L.; Drake, B., (2009). Strategic human resource management: The evolution of the field. Hum. Resour. Manage. Rev., 19(2): 64-85 (22 pages).

Lu, K.; Zhu, J.; Bao , H., (2015). High-performance human resource management and firm performance: The mediating role of innovation in China. Ind. Manage. Data Syst., 115(2): 353-382 (30 pages).

Medcof, J.W.; Song, L.J., (2013). Exploration, exploitation and human resource management practices in cooperative and entrepreneurial HR configurations. Int. J. Hum. Resour. Manage., 24(15): 2911-2926 (16 pages).

Poor Ahmad, A.; Ziyarai ,K.; Hataminezhad, H.;  Pashah, P.; Abadi, Sh., (2018). Explain the concept and properties of smart city. Baghenazar Scientific-Investigative Monthly, 15 (58):5-26 (21 pages).

Rahimi , F.;  Mohammadi , J.;  Pourzare , H., (2016). The impact of commitment-based HRM practices on flexibility of human resources and competitive advantage. Manage. Stud., 25(82): 99-122 (23 pages).

Sandulli , F.D.; Ferraris, A.; Bresciani , S., (2017). How to select the right public partner in smart city projects, R and D Manage., 47(4): 607-619 (12 pages).

Sarkar, A. N., (2015). Significance of Smart Cities in 21st Century: An International Business Perspective. J. Int. Business., 2(2): 53-82 (30 pages).

Shirazi , A. , Hosseini R., Seyyed, M., (2014). Analysis of the impact of HRM on employee retention.  Manage. Develop. Revolution, 19: 11-18 (8 pages).

Simsek , Z., (2009). Organizational ambidexterity: Towards a multilevel understanding. J. Manage . Stud., 46(4): 597–624 (28 pages).

Tardivo , G.; Santoro, G.; Ferraris, A., (2017). The role of public-private partnerships in developing open social innovation: the case of GoogleGlass4Lis, World Rev. Entrepreneurship Manage. Sustainable Develop., 13(5/6): 580-592 (13 pages).

Tushman, M.L.; O'Reilly, C.A., (1996). Ambidextrous organizations: Managing evolutionary and revolutionary change,.California Manage. Rev., 38: 8-30 (22 pages).

Vivares, JA.; Sarache Castro, WA.; Naranjo-Valencia, JC., (2016). Impact of human resource management on performance in competitive priorities. Int. J. Operations Product. Manage., 36(2): 114-134 (21 pages).

Vrontis, D.; Thrassou, A.; Santoro, G.; Papa, A., (2017). Ambidexterity, external knowledge and performance in knowledge-intensive firms. J. Technol. Transfer., 42(2):  374–388 (15 pages).

Zhang, J.A.; Edgar, F.; Geare, A.; O'Kane, C., (2016). The interactive effects of entrepreneurial orientation and capability-based HRM on firm performance: The mediating role of innovation ambidexterity. Ind. Marketing Manage., 59: 131-143 (13 pages).

Ziyari , K.;  Motidoust , A.;  Heidari, S.; Bashardoustjadid, M., (2014). The role of intellectual capital in more efficient use of human resources training in the field of urban management. Case Study: Gilan. Spatial plan. Geogr., 4(4): 25-42 (18 pages).


International Journal of Human Capital in Urban Management (IJHCUM) welcomes letters to the editor for the post-publication discussions and corrections which allows debate post publication on its site, through the Letters to Editor. Letters pertaining to manuscript published in IJHCUM should be sent to the editorial office of IJHCUM within three months of either online publication or before printed publication, except for critiques of original research. Following points are to be considering before sending the letters (comments) to the editor.

[1] Letters that include statements of statistics, facts, research, or theories should include appropriate references, although more than three are discouraged.

[2] Letters that are personal attacks on an author rather than thoughtful criticism of the author’s ideas will not be considered for publication.

[3] Letters can be no more than 300 words in length.

[4] Letter writers should include a statement at the beginning of the letter stating that it is being submitted either for publication or not.

[5] Anonymous letters will not be considered.

[6] Letter writers must include their city and state of residence or work.

[7] Letters will be edited for clarity and length.