Echelon Institute of Technology Faridabad, Christian Association University Faridabad, West Sagarpur, New Delhi, India


This paper presents a theoretical and empirical analysis of this decision and how it relates to wage setting and the provision of general training. The theoretical framework is a promotion tournament involving M competing firms with heterogeneous productivities, two-level job hierarchies, and a fixed number of managerial positions. This paper also considers an alternative model based on variation in the quality of the worker-employer match. Both models predict the following results: As the number of workers at the lower level of the hierarchy increases, holding fixed the number of managers at the top, 1) internal promotion increases relative to external recruitment, 2) employers provide more general training, 3) the percentage of employees in the upper tail of the wage distribution decreases, 4) profitability increases. This paper tests these predictions using data from the 2017 wave of the WERS, a nationally-representative cross section of Indian establishments. The empirical results are supportive and contribute to the literature some new stylized facts concerning how key employer decisions vary with both the size and shape of the organizational hierarchy.


Main Subjects

Acemoglu, D.; Pischke, S., (1998). Why do firms train?  Theory and evidence, Q. J. Econ., 113(1): 79-119 (41  pages).

Acemoglu, D.; Pischke, S., (1999a).  The structure of wages and investment in general training.  J. Political Econ., 107(3): 539-572 (34 pages).

Acemoglu, D.; Pischke, S., (1999b). Beyond Becker: Training in imperfect labor markets, Eco. J. Features, 109 (453): 112-142 (31 pages).

Agrawal, A.; Charles R. K.; Tsoulouhas, T., (2006). Are outsiders handicapped in CEO successions? J. Cor. Finance, 12(1): 619–644 (26 pages).

Baker, G.; Jensen, M.C.; Murphy, K.J., (1988). Compensation and incentives: Practice versus theory, J. Finance, 43(3): 593-616 (24 pages).

Bernhardt, D., (1995). Strategic promotion and compensation, Rev. Eco. Studies, 62(1): 315–339 (25 pages).

Bernhardt, D.; Scoones, D., (1993). Promotion, turnover, and preemptive wage offers. Am. Eco. Rev., 83(1): 771–791 (21 pages).

Chan, W., (1996). External recruitment versus internal promotion, J. Lab. Econ., 14(4): 555–570 (16 pages).

Chaplin, J.; Mangla, J.; Purdon, S.; Airey, C., (2005). The workplace employment relations survey (WERS) 2004 technical report. National Centre for oficial Research: London.

Demougin, D.; Siow, A., (1994).  Careers in ongoing hierarchies, Am. Econ. Rev., 84(5): 1261-1277 (17 pages).

DeVaro, J., (2006). Internal promotion competitions in firms, T. R. J. Econ., 37(3): 521–542 (22 pages).

DeVaro, J.; Ghosh, S.; Zoghi, C., (2012). Job characteristics and labor market discrimination in promotions: new theory and empirical evidence, (45 pages).

DeVaro, J.; Waldman, M., (2012). The signaling role of promotions: Further theory and empirical evidence. J. Labor Econ., 30(1): 91-147 (57 pages).

Gibbons, R.; Waldman, M., (1999a). Careers in organizations: Theory and evidence. Handb. Labor Eco., (3): 2373-2437 (65 pages).

Gibbons, R.; Waldman, M., (1999b). A theory of wage and promotion dynamics inside firms, Q. J. Econ., 114(1): 1321–1358 (38 pages).

Gibbons, R.; Waldman, M., (2006). Enriching a theory of wage and promotion Dynamics inside Firms, J. Labor Econ., 24(1): 59–107 (49 pages).

Golan, L., (2005). Counteroffers and efficiency in labor markets with asymmetric information, J. L.  Econ., 23(1): 373-393 (20 pages).

Kim, J. (2007). Employee poaching, predatory hiring, and covenants not to compete, Int. J. Hum. Resour. Manage. 5(1): 51–65 (15 pages).

Lauterbach, B.; Weisberg, J., (1994). Top management successions: the choice between internal and external sources, I. J. H. Res. Manage., 5(1): 51– 65 (15 pages).

Lazear, E.P., (2012). Raids and offer matching. In 35th Anniversary retrospective, 577-601(25 pages). Emerald group publishing limited.

Milgrom, P., Oster, S., (1987). Job discrimination, market forces, and the invisibility hypothesis.  Quart. J. Econ., 102(3): 453-476 (24 pages).

Murphy, K.J., (1999). Executive compensation, Handb. Econ. Ashenfelter and D. Card, Eds.

vol. 3, Part B, 2485-2563(79 pages).

Owan, H., (2004). Promotion, turnover, earnings, and firm-sponsored training, J. Labor Econ., 22(1): 955-978 (24 pages).

Parrino, R., (1997). CEO Turnover and outside succession across-sectional analysis, J. Financ. Econ., 46(1): 165–197 (33 pages).

Costa, J.E.R.I., 1988. Managerial task assignment and promotions. Econometrica: J. Econ. Soc., 56(2): 449-466 (18 pages).

Waldman, M. (1984). Job assignments, signaling, and efficiency, T. RAND J. Econ., 15(1): 255–267 (13 pages).

Waldman, M., (2003). Ex Ante Versus Ex Post Optimal Promotion Rules: The Case of Internal Promotion, Econ. Inquiry, 41(1): 27–41 (15 pages).

Waldman, M., (2007). Contracting theory and patterns of evidence in internal labor markets, J. Labor Econ.., 8(1): 230-250 (21 pages).

Zábojník, J., Bernhardt, D., (2001). Corporate tournaments, human capital acquisition, and the firm size-wage relation. Rev. Econ. Stud., 68(3): 693–716 (24 pages).


International Journal of Human Capital in Urban Management (IJHCUM) welcomes letters to the editor for the post-publication discussions and corrections which allows debate post publication on its site, through the Letters to Editor. Letters pertaining to manuscript published in IJHCUM should be sent to the editorial office of IJHCUM within three months of either online publication or before printed publication, except for critiques of original research. Following points are to be considering before sending the letters (comments) to the editor.

[1] Letters that include statements of statistics, facts, research, or theories should include appropriate references, although more than three are discouraged.

[2] Letters that are personal attacks on an author rather than thoughtful criticism of the author’s ideas will not be considered for publication.

[3] Letters can be no more than 300 words in length.

[4] Letter writers should include a statement at the beginning of the letter stating that it is being submitted either for publication or not.

[5] Anonymous letters will not be considered.

[6] Letter writers must include their city and state of residence or work.

[7] Letters will be edited for clarity and length.