Document Type: ORIGINAL RESEARCH PAPER

Authors

1 Department of Environment, Islamic Azad University, Shahrood Branch, Shahrood, Iran

2 Department of Urban Planning, Islamic Azad University, Shahrood Branch, Shahrood, Iran

Abstract

Quantitative and qualitative monitoring and evaluation of risk management programs will play an important role in the development of Tehran metropolitan railway transport. Considering the tectonic studies, seismic zones, land degradation and faults in north and south of Tehran, the development of underground railway lines, the assessment of the vulnerability of subway stations and the escalation of the crisis with the destruction of urban exhausted earthquakes is very important with the occurrence of earthquake and flood. This study, focusing on the issue of risk assessment and vulnerability of the development of the rail transport network and the approach to physical and aerospace hazard monitoring of metro stations. For this purpose, three selected metro stations in Tehran were studied. In the research, a combined method based on library studies, review of records and records, Delphi technique, AHP method, and overlaying of layers have been used. The results of the vulnerability assessment indicate that each of Tajirish, Nawab and Darvazeh Shemiran, with a risk number of 5.10, 5.76, and 5.79, are in the risk limit range, respectively. In fact, all stations need to adopt smart measures and management and executive solutions to reduce potential damage.

Keywords

Main Subjects

Al-Sheikh, A.A., (2007). Earthquake disaster management in Tehran Metro by GIS. 9th international Conference on Rail Transport.  (In Persian)

Askarizadeh, L.; Karbassi, A.R.; Ghalibaf, M.B.; Nouri, J., (2017). Debris management after earthquake incidence in ancient City of Ray. Glob. J. Enviro. Sci. Manage., 3(4): 447-456 (10 pages).

Aydan, Ö.; Ohta, Y.; Geniş, M.; Tokashiki, N.; Ohkubo, K., (2010). Response and stability of underground structures in rock mass during earthquakes. Rock Mech. Rock Eng., 43(6): 857-875 (19 page).

Borja, J., (2007). Counterpoint: Intelligent cities and innovative cities. Universitat Oberta de Catalunya (UOC) Papers: E-Journal on the Knowledge Society, 5.

Dawes, S.S.; Pardo, T.A.; Simon, S.; Cresswell, A.M.; LaVigne, M.F.; Andersen, D.F.; Bloniarz, P.A., (2004). Making Smart IT Choices: Understanding Value and Risk in Government IT Investments (2nd Ed.). Albany, NY: Center for Technology in Government.

European Commission. (2015). "Digital Agenda for Europe".

Fujino, Y.; Takada, T., (2009). Risk assessment, management and monitoring of infrastructure systems. Season 13-resource recycling concrete: Present and future, Japan, 4:233-253 (21 pages).

Giffinger, R.; Gudrun, H. (2010). Smart Cities Ranking: An Effective Instrument for the Positioning of Cities? ACE: Archit. City Environ., 4(12):7-25 (9 pages).

Glaesser, D., 2006. Crisis management in the tourism industry. Routledge.

Goodchild, M. F., (2010). Twenty years of progress: GIS science in 2010. J. Spat. Inform. Sci., (1): (18 pages).

Habibi, K.; Poorahmad, A.; Meshkini, A., Asgari, A.; Nazari Adli, S., (2008). Determining structural elements effective in vulnerability of the old urban fabric by GIS and Fuzzy logic, case of Zandjan. Aesthetics Art. 33.  27-36 (10 pages). (In Persian).

Hartley, J., (2005). Innovation in governance and public services: Past and present. Public Money Manage. 25(1), 27-34 (8 pages).

Hollands, R.G., (2008). Will the real smart city please stand up? City 12 (3), 303–320 (19 pages).

JICA, (2006). The comprehensive master plan study on urban seismic disaster prevention  and management for the greater Terhran area is the Islamic Republic of Iran. Final report (IUMmary), Japan international cooperation agency, Executive IUMmary.

Jozi, A., (2012). Risk assessment and management. Islamic Azad Uni. Publications. (344 pages). (In Persian).

Kahneman, D.; Tversky, A., (2013). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. In Handbook of the fundamentals of financial decision making: Part I: 99-127 (28 pages).

Kent, W., (2004), Muhlabauer Pipeline Risk Management Manual, Ideas, Techniques, and resources, New York, 3rd Edition.

Khaledi, S., (2001). Natural Disasters, Shahid Beheshti University Press, 139-206 (68 pages). (In Persian).

Moss Kanter, R.; Litow, S.S., (2009). Informed and interconnected: A manifesto for smarter cities. Harvard Business School General Management Unit Working Paper, 09-141 (133 pages).

Nouri, J.; Mansouri, N.; Abbaspour, M.; Karbassi, A.R.; Omidvari, M., (2011). Designing a developed model for assessing the disaster induced vulnerability value in educational centers. Safety Sci., 49(5): 679-685 (7 pages).

Odendaal, N., (2003). Information and communication technology and local governance: Understanding the difference between cities in developed and emerging economies. Computers, Environ. Urban Syst., 27(6), 585-607 (13 pages).

Pardo, T.A.; Burke, G.B., (2008). Government worth having: A briefing on interoperability for government leaders. Center for Technology in Government, University at Albany, SUNY Oct.

Rafee, N.; Karbassi, A.R.; Nouri, J.; Safari, E.; Mehrdadi, M., (2008). Strategic Management of Municipal Debris aftermath of an earthquake.   Int.    J. Environ.Res., 2(2): 205-214 (10 pages).

Rashed, T.; Weeks, J., (2003). Assessing vulnerability to earthquake hazards through spatial multicriteria analysis of urban areas. Int. J. Geog. Info. Sci., 17(6): 547-576 (30 pages).

Shiae, I.; Habibi, K.; Torabi, K., (2010). Survey in vulnerability of cities against earthquake by means of inverse analytical hierarchy process (IHWP) and GIS. International congress of the Islamic world geographers.

TUSROC., (2015). Tehran Urban and Suburban Railway Operation Co.

Vasseur, J., (2010). Smart cities and urban networks, In Vasseur, J. ; Dunkels, A. (Eds.), Interconnecting Smart Objects with IP: The Next Internet. Burlington, MA: Morgan Kaufmann. (18 pages).