1 Department of Human Resource Management, Faculty of Management, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran

2 Department of Management, Institute for Humanities and Cultural Studies, Tehran, Iran


People in every organization could be considered as the most important resource which contributes to the development of that organization. In fact, human capital is the most important dimension of organization’s intellectual capital especially in service-oriented organizations like municipality. Therefore, the main purpose of this paper is to introduce a suitable framework for human capital evaluation of different municipal districts. This framework consists of three steps. First, the main human capital components and their related indicators are determined through literature survey. Then the relative importance of these components is calculated based on experts’ judgments. Finally, organizations are ranked in terms of human capital components and their relevant indicators. TOPSIS, A well-known multi-criteria decision-making method was used for ranking alternative municipal districts based on the weighted HC criteria. A fuzzy approach was integrated with this method to make up the vagueness of decision-makers’ judgments. The applicability of the proposed framework was demonstrated by a numerical example.


Main Subjects

Abeysekera, I.; Guthrie, J., (2004). Human capital reporting in a developing nation, Brit. Account. Rew., 36(3): 251–268 (18 pages).

Baxter, R.; Matear, S., (2004). Measuring intangible value in business-to-business buyer–seller relationships: An intellectual capital perspective. Ind. Market. Manage., 33(6): 491– 500 (10 pages).

Boon, C.; Eckardt, R.; Lepak, D. P.; Boselie, P., (2018). Integrating strategic human capital and strategic human resource management, Int. J. of Hum. Res. Manage., 29(1): 34-67 (34 pages).

Bontis, N., (1998). Intellectual capital: an exploratory study that develops measures and models, Manage. Decision., 36(2): 63-76 (14 pages).

Bontis, N.; Keow, W. C.; Richardson, S., (2000). Intellectual capital and business performance in Malaysian industries, J. Intell. Cap., 1(1): 85-100 (16 pages).

Bozbura, F. T.; Beskese, A.; Kahraman, C., (2007). Prioritization of human capital measurement indicators using fuzzy AHP, Expert. Sist. Appl., 32(4): 1100-1112 (13 pages).

Bozbura, F.; Beskese, A., (2007). Prioritization of organizational capital measurement indicators using fuzzy AHP, Int. J. Aprox.  Reason., 44(2): 124–147 (24 pages).

Brooking, A., (1997). The Management of Intellectual Capital. Long Range Plann., 30(3): 364-365 (2 pages).

Calabrese, A.; Costa, R.; Menichini, T., (2013). Using Fuzzy AHP to manage Intellectual Capital assets: An application to the ICT service industry, Expert Syst. Appl., 40(9): 3747–3755 (9 pages).

Campbell, D.; Abdul Rahman, M., (2010). A longitudinal examination of intellectual capital reporting in Marks and Spencer annual reports, 1978–2008. Brit. Account. Rew., 42(1): 56–70 (15 pages).

Chen, C. T.; Tai, W. S., (2005). Measuring the intellectual capital performance based on 2-tuple fuzzy linguistic information. In The 10th Annual Meeting of APDSI, Asia Pacific District of Decision Sciences Institute (Vol. 20).

Guerrero-Baena, M. D.; Gómez-Limón, J. A.; Fruet, J. V., (2015). A multi-criteria method for environmental management system selection: an intellectual capital approach, J. Cleaner Prod., 105: 428-437 (10 pages).

Karsak, E. E., (2002). Distance-based fuzzy MCDM approach for evaluating flexible manufacturing system alternatives, Int. J. Prod. Res., 40(13): 3167-3181 (15 pages).

Mehralian, G.; Rasekh, H.; Akhavan, P.; Ghatari, A., (2013). Prioritization of intellectual capital indicators in knowledge-based industries:Evidence from pharmaceutical industry. Int. J. Inform. Manage., 33(1): 209– 216 (8 pages).

Shih, K.-H.; Liu, Y.-T.; Jones, C.;  Lin, B., (2010). The indicators of human capital for financial institutions. Expert Syst. Appl., 37(2): 1503–1509 (7 pages).

Suraj, O.; Bontis, N., (2012). Managing intellectual capital in Nigerian telecommunications companies. J. Intellectual Capital, 13(2): 262-282 (21 pages).

Tai, W.-S.; Chen, C.-T., (2009). A new evaluation model for intellectual capital based on computing with linguistic variable. Expert  Syst. Appl., 36(2): 3483–3488 (6 pages).

Tavakoli, M. M.; Molavi, B.; Shirouyehzad, H., (2017). Organizational Performance Evaluation Considering Human Capital Management Approach by Fuzzy-DEA: A Case Study. Int. J. Res. Indust. Eng., 6(1), 1-16 (6 pages).

Wang, C. H.; Wu, H. S., (2016). A novel framework to evaluate programmable logic controllers: a fuzzy MCDM perspective. J. Intell. Manuf., 27(2): 315–324 (10 pages).

Wang, Y.J.; Lee, H.-S., (2007). Generalizing TOPSIS for fuzzy multiple-criteria group decision-making. Comput. Math. Appl., 53(11): 1762-1772 (11 pages).

Wudhikarn, R., (2018). Improving the intellectual capital management approach using the hybrid decision method. Int. J. Intell. Capital, Available at:

Zadeh, L. A., (1965). Fuzzy sets. Inform. Comput., 8(3): 338-353 (16 pages).

Zadeh, L. A., (1975). The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning-I. Inform. Sciences, 8(3): 199-249 (51 pages).


International Journal of Human Capital in Urban Management (IJHCUM) welcomes letters to the editor for the post-publication discussions and corrections which allows debate post publication on its site, through the Letters to Editor. Letters pertaining to manuscript published in IJHCUM should be sent to the editorial office of IJHCUM within three months of either online publication or before printed publication, except for critiques of original research. Following points are to be considering before sending the letters (comments) to the editor.

[1] Letters that include statements of statistics, facts, research, or theories should include appropriate references, although more than three are discouraged.

[2] Letters that are personal attacks on an author rather than thoughtful criticism of the author’s ideas will not be considered for publication.

[3] Letters can be no more than 300 words in length.

[4] Letter writers should include a statement at the beginning of the letter stating that it is being submitted either for publication or not.

[5] Anonymous letters will not be considered.

[6] Letter writers must include their city and state of residence or work.

[7] Letters will be edited for clarity and length.