Document Type : ORIGINAL RESEARCH PAPER

Author

Management and Entrepreneurship Department, Coles College of Business Kennesaw State University, 560 Parliament Garden Way, Kennesaw, GA 30144-5591, USA

Abstract

The central issue in strategy formulation and implementation process, or strategy-making, is the identification of environmental forces and the preparation of a plan of action to deal with them. This necessitates scanning the environment for gathering information. Environmental scanning should enable the firm to identify these forces. Doing this not only calls for information gathering, but also for deciding what to look for, where to look, and what to select from the very large amount of information available. These steps are based on culturally programmed perception processes. Also, strategy-making requires assessing internal capabilities of the firm. Both, internal and external steps in the strategy-making process involve perception and thinking, both of which are influenced by culture. Therefore, country differences can be expected in each step. In this regard, the process of strategy making varies among managers of different cultures. This paper addresses these issues and discusses implications of cultural differences on the strategy-making process.

Keywords

Main Subjects

Barsoux, J.L.; Lawrence, P., (1991). The making of a French manager. Harvard Bus. Rev., 69: 58-67 (10 pages).
Barsoux, J.L.; Lawrence, P., (2013). French Management: Elitism in Action. Routledge.
Binder, J.R.; Westbury, C. F.; McKiernan, K.; Possing, E. T.; Medler, D., (2005). Distinct brain systems for processing concrete and abstract concepts. J. Cogn. Neuroscience, 17(6): 905-917 (13 pages).
Crutch, S.J.; Warrington, E. K., (2005). Abstract and concrete concepts have structurally different representational frameworks. Brain, 128(3): 615-627 (13 pages).
Diener, E.; Oishi, S.; Lucas, R.E., (2003). Personality, culture, and subjective well-being: Emotional and cognitive evaluations of life. Ann. Rev. Psychol., 54(1): 403-425 (24 pages).
Doktor, R., (1983). Some tentative comments on Japanese and American decision making. Decis. Sci., 14(4): 607-615 (9 pages).
Hofstede, G., (1993). Cultural constraints in management. Acad. Manage. Exec., 7(1): 81-94 (14 pages).
Iwata, R., (1982). Japanese-Style Management: Its Foundations and Prospects. Tokyo: Asian Productivity Organization.
Kolde, E.J., (1985). Environment of international business, Boston, MA: PWS- Kent Publishing Company.
Lee, J.A., (1966). Cultural analysis in overseas operations. Harvard Bus. Rev., 44: 106-114 (8 pages).
Marsh, H.W.; Kong, C.K.; Hau, K.T., (2001). Extension of the internal/external frame of reference model of self-concept formation: Importance of native and nonnative languages for Chinese students. J. Educ. Psychol., 93(3): 543-553 (10 pages).
Maruyama, M., (1984). Alternative concepts of management: Insights from Asia and Africa.” Asia Pac. J. Manage., 1(2):100-111 (12 pages).
Masuda, T.; Nisbett, R.E., (2001). Attending holistically versus analytically: comparing the context sensitivity of Japanese and Americans. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol., 81(5), 922-934 (13 pages).
Nakamura, H., (1964). Ways of Thinking of Eastern People, Honolulu, HI: East-West Center Press.
Nisbett, R.E., (2003). The geography of thought, New York, The Free Press.
Pattee, H.H., (2012). Evolving self-reference: matter, symbols, and semantic closure. In Laws, Language and Life. Springer Netherlands, 211-226 (16 pages).
Schneider, S.C., (1989). Strategy formulation: The impact of national culture. Organ. Stud., 10 (2): 149-168 (20 pages).
Tusunoda, T., (1975). The differences of recognition mechanism toward natural sounds between Japanese and Westerners. Med. Biol., 88: 309-314 (6 pages).

LETTERS TO EDITOR

International Journal of Human Capital in Urban Management (IJHCUM) welcomes letters to the editor for the post-publication discussions and corrections which allows debate post publication on its site, through the Letters to Editor. Letters pertaining to manuscript published in IJHCUM should be sent to the editorial office of IJHCUM within three months of either online publication or before printed publication, except for critiques of original research. Following points are to be considering before sending the letters (comments) to the editor.


[1] Letters that include statements of statistics, facts, research, or theories should include appropriate references, although more than three are discouraged.

[2] Letters that are personal attacks on an author rather than thoughtful criticism of the author’s ideas will not be considered for publication.

[3] Letters can be no more than 300 words in length.

[4] Letter writers should include a statement at the beginning of the letter stating that it is being submitted either for publication or not.

[5] Anonymous letters will not be considered.

[6] Letter writers must include their city and state of residence or work.

[7] Letters will be edited for clarity and length.

CAPTCHA Image