Department of Urban Design and Planning, Faculty of Art and Architecture, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran


BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Sound is one of the most important tools for recognizing urban spaces. Zandieh area of Shiraz as one of the historic context shaped during the ages hase been chosen in order to obtain a proper response to the individual's perception of urban historic spaces soundscape. The main object of this manuscript achieves a sufficient way in order to organize urban soundscape by utilizing assessments and perception data perceived by users.
METHODS: The narrative interview method (a sample group of 129 users who were active in space for more than 30 minutes) and behavior observation which are subsets of the sound walking technique have been used; Also, the data which were collected in the previous stage, based on the components of the Kano model, were categorized into three categories of basic, performance and attractiveness.
FINDING: With regard to the findings and assessments in the case study, it can be inferred that 69% of the urban space's users perceive noises such as underpass fans' noise more than any others; Consequently, this has led to the lack of acceptance by space users; Also, it was cleared by interviewing listeners in urban space that 59% of the interviewees have preferred natural Sounds to human and 76% preferred tranquility at the urban environment While only 11% of the users preferred the development of a vibrant space.
CONCLUSION: Base on that strategies such as planting vegetation in order to prevent the street noise, allocating water bodies in order to have water sound with proper shading and a Desirable view of historical spaces to increase the sense of richness have been presented. Also, in order to achieve an efficient method to improve the soundscapes of urban environments, basic strategies, performance strategies and at last strategies for increasing the attractiveness of urban environments' soundscape should be implemented.


Main Subjects

Aletta, F.; Kang, J.; Axelsson, S., (2016). Soundscape descriptors and a conceptual framework for developing predictive soundscape models. Landscape Urban Plann., (149): 65-74 (10 Pages).

Aletta, F.; Oberman, T.; Kang, J., (2018). Positive health-related effects of perceiving urban soundscapes: a systematic review. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 15(11): 2392 (2 pages).

Berglund, B.; Nilsson, M. E, (2006). On a tool for measuring soundscape quality in urban residential areas. Acta Acust. united Acust., 92(6): 938–944 (7 pages).

Blesser, B.; Salter, L.R, (2009). The Other Half of the Soundscape: Aural Architecture. In World Federation Acoustic Ecology Conference, Blesser Associate, México: 2-8 (7 pages).

Brambilla, G.; Gallo, V; Zambon, G. (2013). The soundscape quality in some urban parks in Milan, Italy. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 10(6): 2348–2369 (22 pages).

Brown, L.; Kang, J.; Gjestland, T., (2011). Towards Standardization in Soundscape Preference Assessment. Appl. Acoust., 72(6): 387-392 (6 pages).

Cain, R.; Jennings, P.; Poxon, J., (2013). The development and application of the emotional dimensions of a soundscape. Appl. Acoust., 74(2):232-239 (8 pages).

Cain, R.; Jennings, P.; Adams, M.; Bruce, N.; Carlyle, A.; Cusack, P.; Davies, W.; Hume, K.; Plack, C. J., (2008). SOUND-SCAPE: A framework for characterising positive urban soundscapes. J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 123(5): 3394-3396 (3 pages).

Carvalho, M.; Davies, W. J.; Fazenda, B. M., (2019). Connecting design, emotion, and behaviour in urban soundscape. SPARC 2019 Fake News and Home Truths, 3 - 4 July 2019, MediaCity Salford, UK.

Chen, C.; Chuang, M., (2008). Integrating the Kano model into a robust design approach to enhance customer satisfaction with product design. Int. J. Prod. Econ., 114(2): 667–681(15 pages).

Cobianchi, M.; Drever, J. L.; Lavia, L., (2019). Adaptive soundscape design for liveable urban spaces: a hybrid methodology across environmental acoustics and sonic art. Cities & Health: 1–6 (6 pages).

Dace, E.; Stibe, A.; Timma, L., (2020). A holistic approach to manage environmental quality by using the Kano model and social cognitive theory. Corp. Social Respons. Environ. Manage., 27(2): 430-443 (14 pages).

Davies, W.J.; Adams, M.D.; Bruce, N.S.; Cain, R.; Carlyle, A.; Cusack, P.; Hall, D.A.; Hume, K.I.; Irwin, A.; Jennings, P.; Marselle, M., (2013). Perception of soundscapes: an interdisciplinary approach. Appl. Acoust., 74(2): 224-231 (8 pages).

Dubois, D.; Guastavino, C.; Raimbault, M., (2006). A Cognitive approach to urban soundscapes: Using verbal data to access everyday life auditory categories. Acta Acust. united Acust., 92(6): 865–874 (10 pages).

Finster, M.; Eagan, P.; Hussey, D., (2001). Linking industrial ecology with business strategy: creating value for green product design. J. Ind. Ecol., 5(3): 107–125(19 pages).

Gale, T.; Ednie, A.; Beeftink, K.; Adiego, A., (2020). Beyond noise management: exploring visitors’ perceptions of positive emotional soundscape dimensions. J. Leisure Res.: 1-25 (25 pages).

Ghalenoei, M.; Haghighi, M., (2015). Evaluation of Soundscape in Urban Spaces. Sci. Soc. Archi.  Urban plann. 7(12):127-138 (12 pages). (In Persian)

Guastavino, C., (2006). The ideal urban soundscape: Investigating the sound quality of French cities. Acta Acust. united Acust., 92(6): 945–951 (11 pages).

Hong, J. Y.; Jeon, J. Y., (2013). Designing sound and visual components for enhancement of urban soundscapes. J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 134(3): 2026-2036 (11 pages).

Inayah, L.; Indrawati, S., (2020). Classification and Identification of Urban Forest Soundscapes (Study of the Reached Green Open Space Standard). EduARCHsia & Senvar 2019 International Conference, 146-151 (6 pages).

International Organization for Standardization., (2014). Acoustics soundscape part 1: definition and conceptual framework., ISO press, Geneva, Italy.

Jennings, P.; Cain, R., (2013). A Framework for Improving Urban Soundscapes. Appl. Acoust., (74): 293-299 (7 pages).

Jeon, J. Y.; Lee, P. J.; You, J.; Kang, J., (2012). Acoustical characteristics of water sound for soundscape enhancement in urban open spaces. J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 131(3): 2101-2109 (9 pages).

Jeon, J. Y.; Jo, H. I., (2020). Effects of audio-visual interactions on soundscape and landscape perception and their influence on satisfaction with the urban environment. Build. Environ.        , 169: 106544.

Jo, H. I.; Jeon, J. Y., (2020). The influence of human behavioral characteristics on soundscape perception in urban parks: Subjective and observational approaches. Landscape Urban Plann., 203: 103890.

Kang, J., (2006). Urban Sound Environment., Taylor & Francis, London, England.

Kano, N., (1984). Attractive Quality and Must-Be Quality. Soc. Qual. Control. (14): 39-48 (10 pages).

Leus, M.; Herssens, J., (2015). The Soundscapes of Antwerp: A Study on the Acoustic Genius Loci. Energy Procedia, (78): 25-30 (6 pages).

Liu, J.; Kang, J.; Behm, H.; Luo, T., (2014). Effects of landscape on soundscape perception: Soundwalks in city parks. Landscape Urban Plann., 123: 30-40 (11 pages).

Liu, Q.; Liu, Z.; Jiang, J.; Qi, J., (2020). A new soundscape analysis tool: Soundscape Analysis and Mapping System (SAMS). Appl. Acoust., 169: 107454.

Mikulić, J.; Prebežac, D., (2011). A critical review of techniques for classifying quality attributes in the Kano model. Managing  Service Qualiyty., Int. J., 21(1): 46-66 (21 pages).

Min, H.; Yun, J.; Geum, Y., (2018). Analyzing dynamic change in customer requirements: An approach using review-based Kano analysis. Sustainability, 10(3): 746-748(3 pages).

Nilsson, E.; Axelsson, Ö.; Berglund, B., (2003). Children’s and adults’ perception of soundscapes at school. Proceedings of EuroNoise, Naples, Italy.

Payne, S.R.; Davies, W.J.; Adams, M. D., (2009). Research into the practical and policy applications of soundscape concepts and techniques in urban areas, Salford university press, Salford, England.

Raimbault, M.; Dubois, D., (2005). Urban Soundscapes: Experiences and Knowledge. Cities, 22(5): 339-350 (12 pages).

Saunders, A.; Moles, K., (2016). Following or Forging a Way through the World: Audio Walks and the Making of Place. Emotion, Space and Soc., (20): 68-74 (7 pages).

Schafer, R. M., (1977). The Tuning of the World, Knopf, New York, USA.

Shahabian, P.; Lamirian, S., (2016). Survey on Soundscape of Valiasr Street in Tehran with Emphasis on a Human Perception, Armanshahr J. Archi. Urban Dev., 9(17): 237-247 (11 pages). (IN Persian)

Shahin, A.; Zairi, M., (2009). Kano model: A dynamic approach for classifying and prioritizing requirements of airline travelers with three case studies on international airlines. Total Qual. Manage., 20(9): 1003-1028 (26 pages).

Steele, D.; Bild, E.; Tarlao, C.; Guastavino, C., (2019). Soundtracking the public space: outcomes of the Musikiosk soundscape intervention. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 16(10): 1865-1867 (3 pages).

Truax, B., (1978). The World Soundscape Project’s Handbook for Acoustic Ecology. Aesthetic Research Centre: World Soundscape Project, ARC Publications, Ottawa, Canada.

Van Renterghem, T.; Bockstael, A.; De Weirt, V.; Botteldooren, D., (2013). Annoyance, Detection and Recognition of Wind Turbine Noise. Sci. Total Environ., (456): 333-345 (13 pages).

Westminster city council., (2015). Westminster Noise Strategy, Westminster City Council press,

 Westminster, England.


International Journal of Human Capital in Urban Management (IJHCUM) welcomes letters to the editor for the post-publication discussions and corrections which allows debate post publication on its site, through the Letters to Editor. Letters pertaining to manuscript published in IJHCUM should be sent to the editorial office of IJHCUM within three months of either online publication or before printed publication, except for critiques of original research. Following points are to be considering before sending the letters (comments) to the editor.

[1] Letters that include statements of statistics, facts, research, or theories should include appropriate references, although more than three are discouraged.

[2] Letters that are personal attacks on an author rather than thoughtful criticism of the author’s ideas will not be considered for publication.

[3] Letters can be no more than 300 words in length.

[4] Letter writers should include a statement at the beginning of the letter stating that it is being submitted either for publication or not.

[5] Anonymous letters will not be considered.

[6] Letter writers must include their city and state of residence or work.

[7] Letters will be edited for clarity and length.