Department of Mathematics, Parsa Institute of Higher Education, Babolsar, Iran


Organizational citizenship behavior has always been tested in the knowledge-intensive sectors of societies. Organizational citizenship behavior is a voluntary and discretionary behavior that is supposed to build up the cultural aspect of the organization; it is not part of the personnel's contractual tasks and can contribute to the successful implementation of the organization's objectives. The purpose of this study is to elucidate the interactions among the organizational citizenship behavior components and the organizational performance for the bank systems in the Asian context; thus the province of Mazandaran in Iran was chosen. The number of studied banks were 33 and 127 structured questionnaires were distributed among the selected bank employees and based on the received data; correlation tests have been conducted. In order to analyze the gained data, two types of parametric and non-parametric tests have been applied. The results indicated correlations between 0.5 and 0.8 for these variables. It is worth noting that both parametric and non-parametric tests had almost the same results; they both showed a positive and significant correlation.


Main Subjects

Acaray, A.; Akturan, A., (2015). The relationship between organizational citizenship behavior and organizational silence. Procedia-Soc. Behav. Sci., 207: 472-482 (11 pages).

Akturan, A.; Çekmecelioğlu, H. G., (2016). The effects of knowledge sharing and organizational citizenship behaviors on creative behaviors in educational institutions. Procedia-Soc. Behav. Sci., 235: 342-350 (9 pages).

Alder, H.L.; Roessler, E.B., (1977). Introduction to probability and statistics (No. 519 A53 1977).Cameron, K.S., (1986). Effectiveness as paradox: Consensus and conflict in conceptions of organizational effectiveness. Manage. Sci., 32(5): 539-553 (15 pages).

Clark, B.H., (1999). Marketing performance measures: history and interrelationships. J. Market. Manage., 15(8): 711-732 (22 pages).

Cochran, W.G., (1963). Sampling Techniques. Wiley.

Chandler Jr. A.D., (1962). 1998, Strategy and Structure: Chapters in the History of the American Industrial Enterprise.

Durst, S.; Hinteregger, C.; Zieba, M., (2019). The linkage between knowledge risk management and organizational performance. J. Bus. Res., 105: 1-10 (10 pages).

David, F.R., (2013). Strategic management: A competitive advantage approach, Concepts and cases. Pearson.

Etzioni, A., (1960). Two approaches to organizational analysis: A critique and a suggestion. Adm. Sci. Q., 257-278 (22 pages).

Friedlander, F.; Pickle, H., (1968). Components of effectiveness in small organizations. Adm. Sci. Q., 289-304 (16 pages).

Hays, W. L. Statistics (1981). New York-HOH, Rinehart and Winston.

Hart, T.A.; Gilstrap, J.B.; Bolino, M.C., (2016). Organizational citizenship behavior and the enhancement of absorptive capacity. J. Bus. Res., 69(10): 3981-3988 (8 pages).

Jenatabadi, H.S., (2015). An overview of organizational performance index: definitions and measurements. Available at SSRN 2599439.

Jahani, M.A.; Mahmoudjanloo, S.; Rostami, F.H.; Nikbakht, H.A.; Mahmoudi, G., (2018). Datasets on organizational citizenship behavior in the selected hospitals with different ownership. Data. brief., 19: 288-292 (5 pages).

Kim, W.G.; McGinley, S.; Choi, H.M.; Agmapisarn, C., (2019). Hotels’ environmental leadership and employees’ organizational citizenship behavior. Int. J. Hosp. Manage., 102375 (12 pages).

Lapierre, L.M.; Hackett, R.D., (2007). Trait conscientiousness, leader-member exchange, job satisfaction and organizational citizenship behavior: A test of an integrative model. J. Occup. Organ. Psychol., 80(3): 539-554 (16 pages).

Lorsch, J.W., (1970). Introduction to the structural design of organizations. Organizational structure and design, 1-16 (16 pages).

Lawrence, P.R.; Lorsch, J.W., (1986). Organization and environment: managing differentiation and integration (Harvard Business School Classics).

Macleod, M.; Bowden, R.; Bevan, N.; Curson, I., (1997). The MUSiC performance measurement method. Behav. Inform. Technol., 16(4-5): 279-293 (15 pages).

Mi, L.; Gan, X.; Xu, T.; Long, R.; Qiao, L.; Zhu, H., (2019). A new perspective to promote organizational citizenship behavior for the environment: The role of transformational leadership. J. Clean. Prod., 239: 118002 (11 pages).

Montani, F.; Dagenais- Desmarais, V., (2018). Unravelling the relationship between role overload and organizational citizenship behavior: A test of mediating and moderating effects. Eur. Manage. J., 36(6): 757-768 (12 pages).

Navimipour, N.J.; Milani, F.S.; Hossenzadeh, M., (2018). A model for examining the role of effective factors on the performance of organizations. Technol. Soc., 55: 166-174 (9 pages).

Nawaz, N.; Gomes, M.A., (2018), the Relationship between Organizational Citizenship Behavior and Team Performance: The Mediating Effect of Team Conflict, Manage. Organ. Stud., 5(1): 15-22 (8 pages).

Nohe, C.; Michaelis, B., (2016). Team OCB, leader charisma, and organizational change: A multilevel study. Leadership Q., 27(6): 883-895 (13 pages).

Oldham, G.R.; Cummings, A., (1996). Employee creativity: Personal and contextual factors at work. Acad. Manage. J., 39(3): 607-634 (28 pages).

Palacios-Marqués, D.; García, M.G.; Sánchez, M.M.; Mari, M.P.A., (2019). Social entrepreneurship and organizational performance: A study of the mediating role of distinctive competencies in marketing. J. Bus. Res., 101: 426-432 (7 pages).

SemihYildirim, H.; Philippatos, G.C., (2007). Efficiency of banks: Recent evidence from the transition economies of Europe, 1993–2000. Eur. J. Finance., 13(2): 123-143 (21 pages).

Soltani, Z.; Zareie, B.; Milani, F.S.; Navimipour, N.J., (2018). The impact of the customer relationship management on the organization performance. The journal of High Technol. Manage. Res., 29(2): 237-246 (10 pages).

Sadeghi, G.; Ahmadi, M.; Yazdi, M.T., (2016). The relationship between organizational citizenship behavior and organizational performance (case study: agricultural Jihad organization of Mazandaran province). Probl. Perspect. Manage., 14(3): 317-324 (8 pages).

Spector, P.E.; Fox, S., (2010). Theorizing about the deviant citizen: An attribution explanation of the interplay of organizational citizenship and counterproductive work behavior. Hum. Res. Manage. Rev., 20(2): 132-143 (12 pages).

Sanford, R.A., (2009). The impact of activity-based costing on organizational performance. Nova Southeastern University.

Thompson, J.D., (1967). Organization in Action, New York: McGraw-Hill

Taşkıran, G., (2019). The Relationship between Organizational Citizenship Behavior and Entrepreneurial Orientation: A Research in the Hospitality Industry. Procedia Comput. Sci., 158: 672-679 (8 pages).

Tufan, P.; Wendt, H., (2019). Organizational identification as a mediator for the effects of psychological contract breaches on organizational citizenship behavior: Insights from the perspective of ethnic minority employees. Eur. Managse. J. (12 pages).

Vorhies, D.W.; Morgan, N.A., (2003). A configuration theory assessment of marketing organization fit with business strategy and its relationship with marketing performance. J. Mark., 67(1): 100-115 (16 pages).

Wallot, S.; Leonardi, G., (2018). Deriving inferential statistics from recurrence plots: A recurrence-based test of differences between sample distributions and its comparison to the two-sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. Chaos: An Interdisciplinary J. of Nonlinear Sci., 28(8): 085712 (9 pages).

Wissler, C., (1905). The Spearman correlation formula. Sci., 22(558): 309-311 (3 pages).

Yu, H.Y.; Lou, J.H.; Eng, C.J.; Yang, C.I.; Lee, L.H., (2018). Organizational citizenship behavior of men in nursing professions: Career stage perspectives. Collegian, 25(1): 19-26 (8 pages).


International Journal of Human Capital in Urban Management (IJHCUM) welcomes letters to the editor for the post-publication discussions and corrections which allows debate post publication on its site, through the Letters to Editor. Letters pertaining to manuscript published in IJHCUM should be sent to the editorial office of IJHCUM within three months of either online publication or before printed publication, except for critiques of original research. Following points are to be considering before sending the letters (comments) to the editor.

[1] Letters that include statements of statistics, facts, research, or theories should include appropriate references, although more than three are discouraged.

[2] Letters that are personal attacks on an author rather than thoughtful criticism of the author’s ideas will not be considered for publication.

[3] Letters can be no more than 300 words in length.

[4] Letter writers should include a statement at the beginning of the letter stating that it is being submitted either for publication or not.

[5] Anonymous letters will not be considered.

[6] Letter writers must include their city and state of residence or work.

[7] Letters will be edited for clarity and length.