Faculty of Economics and Management, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran


Optimal housing selection is one of the most important challenges in housing demand, which most people, especially housing investors, are facing. Although there is an overall agreement on the importance of the budget role on choosing the house, the model that uniquely measures the role and impact of all the factors of investment demand for housing has not been presented and no clear explanation is made. Considering the central role of budget constraints, behavioral and control factors in investment demand, this research carried out in the framework of the qualitative (method of data research method) and quantitative (polynomial logistic method) approach to explaining the mental pattern of investment demand for housing in Tabriz. The data were obtained from semi-structured interviews of 12 experts familiar with the issues of housing capital and distributing a questionnaire among 720 households in Tabriz. The result revealed 250 code, 20 concepts, and 4 categories, based on which the qualitative research model was designed. Also, the results of estimating the logit model using the STATA software indicate that important factors such as welfare and comfort aspects with a coefficient of 0.8292, access to urban services with a coefficient of 0.2287 and proximity to relatives with the coefficient of 0.2199 have had a positive and significant effect on the capital investment demand. But the close proximity of the household header with the coefficient of -0.2014 has a negative impact on the choice of housing capital. 


Aliyeva, K., (2017). Multi-criteria house buying decision making based on type-2 fuzzy sets. Proc. Comupt. Sci., 120: 515-520 (6 pages).

Anas, A., (1982). Residential location markets and urban transportation (Academic Press, London).

Barberis, N.; Thaler, R., (2003). A survey of behavioral finance. Handbook of the economics of finance, (G.M. Constantinides, Harris, M., and Stulz, R., eds.), Elsevier.

Bayho, I.; Irwin, E.G.; Haab, T., (2006). Determinants of residential location choice: how important are local public goods in attracting homeowners to central city locations? J. Reg. Sci., 46(1): 97-120 (24 pages).

Backman, K.; Kyngas, H., (1999). Challenges of the grounded theory approach to a novice researcher, Nurse. Health. Sci., 1(3): 147-153 (7 pages).

Bork, L.; Møller, S.V., (2015). Forecasting house prices in the 50 states using dynamic model averaging and dynamic model selection. Int. J. Forecasting., 31(1): 63-78 (16 pages).

Corbin, J.; Strauss, A., (1990). Grounded theory research: procedure and evaluative criteria. Qual. Sociol., 13: 3-21 (19 pages).

Corbin, J.; Strauss, A., (2008). Basics of qualitative research: techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (3rd Ed.). Thousand Oak, California: Sage Publications.

Flick, U., (2007). Managing quality in qualitative research. Sage publication.

Coulombel, N., (2010) Residential choice and household behavior: state of the art, sustain city working paper, 2.2a, ENS Cachan.

Ghezeljeh, T.N.; Emami, A., (2009). Grounded theory: methodology and philosophical perspective. Nurse. Res., 17(1): 15-23 (9 pages).      

Ho, H.P.; Chang, C.T.; Ku, C.Y., (2015). House selection via the internet by considering homebuyers’ risk attitudes with s-shaped utility functions. Eur. J. Oper. Res., 241(1): 188-201(14 pages).    

Kahneman, D.; Tversky, A., (1979). Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47(2): 263-291(29 pages).

Khan, Sh., (2014), Qualitative research method: grounded theory, Int. J. Bus. Manage., 9(11): 224-233 (10 pages).

Kim, M.J.; Morrow-Jones, H.A., (2005). Current determinants of residential location choices: an empirical study in the greater Columbus metropolitan area. In D. M. Levinson, and Krizek, Kevin J. (Ed.), Destinations, 1: 149-170 (22 pages). 

Lee, B.H.Y., (2009). Accessibility and location choice: innovations in measurement and modeling, dissertation of the Washington University.     

Maher, C., (1994). Housing prices and geographical scale: Australian cities in the 1980s. Urban. Stud., 31: 5–27 (23 pages).

Maclennan, D., (1977). Some Thoughts on the nature and purpose of house price studies. Urban. Stud., 14: 59-71 (13 pages).       

Mei, Y.; Hite, D.; Sohngen, B. (2018). Estimation of house price differential of urban tree cover: an application of sample selection approach. Appl. Econom., 50(25): 2804-2811 (8 pages).        

mohammadzade, P.; Ghanbari, A.; Nazemfar, A. (2017). Determination of effective factors on choosing the location of residential unit using a discrete selection model (Case study: Tabriz city).  J. Urban. Econom. Manage., 3(10):95-110 (16 pages). (In Persian)  

Morse, J.M.; Stern, P.N.; Corbin, J.M., (2008). Developing grounded theory: the second generation (1st Ed.). Left Coast Press.

Pascual-Ezama, D.; Scandroglio, B.; Gil-Gomez, d.; Liaño, B., (2014). Can we predict individual investors’ behavior in stock markets? A psychological approach. Univ. Psychol., 13(1): 1-19 (19 pages).

Schmid. E.; Pechan, A.; Mehnert, M.; Eisenack, K., (2017). Imagine all these futures: on heterogeneous preferences and mental models in the German energy transition, Energy. Res. Soc. Sci., 27: 45–56 (11 pages).

Sener, I.; Pendyala, N.; Ram. M.; Bhat-Chandra, R., (2011). Accommodating spatial correlation across choice alternatives in discrete choice models: an application to modeling residential location choice behavior, J. Transp. Geogr., 19(2): 294-303 (10 pages).

Statistical Center of Iran., (2018). Presidency of Islamic republic of Iran. Plan and budget organization.

Wei, Y.; Cao, Y., (2017). Forecasting house prices using dynamic model averaging approach: Evidence from China. Econom. Model., 61: 147-155 (9 pages).

Zaunbrecher, B.S.; Bexten, T.; Wirsum, M.; Ziefle, M., (2016). What is stored, why, and how? Mental models, knowledge, and public acceptance of hydrogen storage, Energy Proc., 99: 108 – 119 (12 pages).


International Journal of Human Capital in Urban Management (IJHCUM) welcomes letters to the editor for the post-publication discussions and corrections which allows debate post publication on its site, through the Letters to Editor. Letters pertaining to manuscript published in IJHCUM should be sent to the editorial office of IJHCUM within three months of either online publication or before printed publication, except for critiques of original research. Following points are to be considering before sending the letters (comments) to the editor.

[1] Letters that include statements of statistics, facts, research, or theories should include appropriate references, although more than three are discouraged.

[2] Letters that are personal attacks on an author rather than thoughtful criticism of the author’s ideas will not be considered for publication.

[3] Letters can be no more than 300 words in length.

[4] Letter writers should include a statement at the beginning of the letter stating that it is being submitted either for publication or not.

[5] Anonymous letters will not be considered.

[6] Letter writers must include their city and state of residence or work.

[7] Letters will be edited for clarity and length.