Tehran Urban Planing and Research Center, Municipality of Tehran, Tehran, Iran


Human resources are the most valuable capital of an organization, and managers are trying to provide motivation and productivity along with preserving the workforce. One way to motivate and increase productivity is to provide welfare services to employees. Using Adams' theory of equality, the current research attempts to design a desirable model for providing welfare services in the organization. It is an applied, descriptive and survey type research. The statistical population includes the staff of District 22 of Municipality of Tehran. Using the principles of sampling size in multivariate regression analysis, 357 questionnaires were completed by cluster sampling method. The process of data analysis was carried out in two stages: determining the relationships between variables and the dynamics of the systems. The results showed that the improvement of financial services was recognized as an attractive scenario of this research because of a 30% increase in productivity. Meanwhile, 38% increase motivation and 27% reduce dissatisfaction. Improvement in entertainment services has been identified as a desirable research scenario due to the optimal and simultaneous increase in motivation and quality of work life. Improving health services has been identified as a weak scenario for not having a significant impact on state variables due to the lack of influence on state variables. 


Main Subjects

Adams, J.S. (1963). Towards an understanding of inequity. J. Abnorm. Soc. Psych., 67(5): 422 (1 page).

Adams, J.S., (1965). Inequity in social exchange. In Advances in experimental social psychology. Academic Press.,2: 267-299 (33 pages).

Argyris, C., (2017). Integrating the Individual and the Organization. Routledge.

Backhaus, K.; Tikoo, S., (2004). Conceptualizing and researching employer branding. Career development international, 9(5): 501-517. (17 pages).

Buonanno, G.; Faverio, P.; Pigni, F.; Ravarini, A.; Sciuto, D.; Tagliavini, M., (2005). Factors affecting ERP system adoption: A comparative analysis between SMEs and large companies. J. Enterprise Info. Manage., 18(4): 384-426(43pages).

Cook, K.S.; Parcel, T.L.,) 1977(. Equity theory: Directions for future research. Social. Inq., 47(2): 75-88 (14 pages).

Cook, K.S.; Cheshire, C.; Rice, E.R.; Nakagawa, S., (2013). Social exchange theory. In Handbook of social psychology. Springer, Dordrecht, 61-88 (29 pages).

Cook, K.S.; Hegtvedt, K.A., (1983). Distributive justice, equity, and equality. Ann. Rev. Sociol., 9(1): 217-241(25 pages).

Cropanzano, R.; Mitchell, M.S., (2005). Social exchange theory: An interdisciplinary review. J. Manage., 31(6): 874-900 (27 pages).

Daileyl, R.C.; Kirk, D.J., (1992). Distributive and procedural justice as antecedents of job dissatisfaction and intent to turnover. Hum. Relat., 45(3): 305-317(13 pages).

De Decker, P., (2011). Understanding housing sprawl: the case of Flanders, Belgium. Environ. Plann., A: 43(7): 1634-1654 (21 pages).

Folger, R.G.; Cropanzano, R., (1998). Organizational justice and human resource management. Sage. Vol. 7.

Forrester, J.W., (1993). System dynamics and the lessons of 35 years. In A systems-based approach to policymaking. Springer, Boston, MA, 199-240 (42 pages).

Greenberg, J., (1994). Using socially fair treatment to promote acceptance of a worksite smoking ban. J. Appl. Psychol., 79(2): 288 (1 page).

Greenberg, J., (1990). Organizational justice: Yesterday, today, and tomorrow. J. Manage., 16(2): 399-432(34 pages).

Goodman, M.R., (1997). Study notes in system dynamics. J. Operation. Res. Soc., 48(11): 1147 (1 page).

Greenberg, J.; Tyler, T.R., (1987). Why procedural justice in organizations? Soc. Justice Res., 1(2): 127-142 (16 pages).

Hsu, I.C., (2008). Knowledge sharing practices as a facilitating factor for improving organizational performance through human capital: A preliminary test. Expert Syst. Appl., 35(3): 1316-1326 (11 pages).

Karnopp, D.C.; Margolis, D.L.; Rosenberg, R.C., (2012). System dynamics: modeling, simulation, and control of mechatronic systems. John Wiley and Sons.

Konovsky, M.A., (2000). Understanding procedural justice and its impact on business organizations. J. Manage., 26(3): 489-511 (13 pages).

Lengnick-Hall, M.L.; Lengnick-Hall, C.A.; Andrade, L.S.; Drake, B., (2009). Strategic human resource management: The evolution of the field. Hum. Resour. Manage. Rev., 19(2): 64-85(22 pages).

Leventhal, G.S.; Karuza, J.; Fry, W.R., (1980). Beyond fairness: A theory of allocation preferences. Justice and social interaction, 3(1): 167-218 (52 pages).

Lepak, D.P.; Snell, S.A., (1999). The human resource architecture: Toward a theory of human capital allocation and development. Academy Manage. Rev., 24(1): 31-48 (18 pages).

Lind, E.A., (2001). Fairness heuristic theory: Justice judgments as pivotal cognitions in organizational relations. Adv. Organ. Just., 56(8). 

Luna‐Reyes, L.F.; Andersen, D.L. (2003). Collecting and analyzing qualitative data for system dynamics: methods and models. System dynamics review:  J. Syst. Dynam. Soc., 19(4): 271-296 (26 pages).

Luthans, F.; Youssef, C.M., (2004). Human, social, and now positive psychological capital management: Investing in people for competitive advantage.

Nishii, L.H.; Lepak, D.P.; Schneider, B., (2008). Employee attributions of the “why” of HR practices: Their effects on employee attitudes and behaviors, and customer satisfaction. Pers. psychol., 61(3): 503-545. (53 pages).

Noe, R.A.; Hollenbeck, J.R.; Gerhart, B. and Wright, P.M., (2017). Human resource management: Gaining a competitive advantage. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Education.

Maon, F.; Lindgreen, A.; Swaen, V., (2010). Organizational stages and cultural phases: A critical review and a consolidative model of corporate social responsibility development. Int. J. Manage. Rev., 12(1): 20-38 (19 pages).

Mikula, G., (1980). Justice and social interaction: Experimental and theoretical contributions from psychological research. New York: Springer-Verla. 167–218 (52 pages).

Radel, J., (2019). Human resources management and human resources development. Handbook of vocational education and training: Developments in the changing world of work. 1-24 (24 pages).

Rawls, J. (2009). A theory of justice. Harvard university press.

Rawls, J., (2013). A theory of justice. Ethica, 581 (1 page).

Schappe, S.P., (1998). Understanding employee job satisfaction: The importance of procedural and distributive justice. J. Bus. Psychol., 12(4): 493-503(12 pages).

Simon, H.A., (2015). The proverbs of administration. Classics of organization theory. 6: 103 (1 page).

Simon, H.A., (2018). The proverbs of administration. In Democracy, bureaucracy, and the study of administration, Routledge. 38-59 (22 pages).

Skarlicki, D.P.; Folger, R., (1997). Retaliation in the workplace: The roles of distributive, procedural, and interactional justice. J. Appl. Psychol., 82(3): 434(1 page).

Stewart, J.; Sambrook, S., (2012). The Historical Development of Human Resource Development in the United Kingdom. Hum. Resour. Develop. Rev., 11(4).

Van den Belt, M., (2004). Mediated modeling: a system dynamics approach to environmental consensus building. Island Press.


International Journal of Human Capital in Urban Management (IJHCUM) welcomes letters to the editor for the post-publication discussions and corrections which allows debate post publication on its site, through the Letters to Editor. Letters pertaining to manuscript published in IJHCUM should be sent to the editorial office of IJHCUM within three months of either online publication or before printed publication, except for critiques of original research. Following points are to be considering before sending the letters (comments) to the editor.

[1] Letters that include statements of statistics, facts, research, or theories should include appropriate references, although more than three are discouraged.

[2] Letters that are personal attacks on an author rather than thoughtful criticism of the author’s ideas will not be considered for publication.

[3] Letters can be no more than 300 words in length.

[4] Letter writers should include a statement at the beginning of the letter stating that it is being submitted either for publication or not.

[5] Anonymous letters will not be considered.

[6] Letter writers must include their city and state of residence or work.

[7] Letters will be edited for clarity and length.