Civil Engineering Department, Vadodara Institute of Engineering, Kotambi, Vadodara, India


Environmental flow requirements, to maintain the functioning of freshwater-dependent ecosystems and restore rivers in ecologically acceptable conditions, depend upon the present water quality status of the river. Various stretches of Vishwamitri River vary in quality and quantity. Water quality index is a tool to converse information regarding water quality of various stretches of river and can be used for zoning them based on their present water quality status. Through such zoning, based on water quality index values as an integral component, Environmental flow requirements can be explored for Vishwamitri. In this paper, ‘Weighted Arithmetic Index’ method is used to find water quality index for both Vishwamitri and its tributaries using observed values of general physico-chemical parameters. The indices have been computed for pre-monsoon, monsoon and post-monsoon seasons at sixteen sampling stations, i.e. S-1 to S-16 along the Vishwamitri and eight sampling stations on its various tributaries. Based on the analysis, Vishwamitri is zoned in two various zones. Sampling stations, S-1 to S-7 represent Zone 1 which contains WQI values from 50 to 75. Sampling stations S-8 to S-16 represent zone 2 which contain WQI values more than 75. Zone 1 is rich with DO whereas zone 2 contains high BOD and less DO. The WQI value of Surya River, a major tributary of Vishwamitri, indicates that river water is suitable for irrigation purpose. The WQI values of tributaries and drains, draining wastewater to stretch of Vishwamitri within Vadodara city, represents water quality as mostly unsuitable for drinking, irrigation or industrial purpose.


This paper focuses on determination of water quality status of Vishwamitri and its tributaries for zoning the river based on Water Quality Status. For the same, Water Quality Index scores at various locations along the Vishwamitri and on its various tributaries are analyzed. The assessment of release of excess runoff in terms of environmental flow may vary based on water quality status of respective zone.


Main Subjects

Abbasi, S.A, (2002). Water quality indices, state of the art report, National Institute of Hydrology, scientific contribution no. INCOH/SAR-25/2002, Roorkee: INCOH, 73-200 (128 pages).

Badr, M.H.; Abdelsamie, E.; Mohammed, B.S.; Laila, F.M.; Ghada, S.A., (2006). Studies on the effect of El-Rahaway drain on the River Nile water pollution by trace metals and major Cations at El-Kanater-El Khyria area under the effect of seasonal variation. Ass. Univ. Bull. Environ. Res., 9(2):205-218 (14 pages).

Balan, I.; Shivakumar, M.; Kumar, P.M., (2012). An assessment of groundwater quality using water quality index in Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India. Chron. Young Sci., 3(2): 146-150 (5 pages).

Bhangaonkar, P. D.; Patel, J. S., (2017). Assessment of environmental flow requirements of Vishwamitri River, Vadodara, Gujarat. Int. J. Sci. Res. Environ. Sci., 5(3): 52-62 (11 pages).

Bhutiani, R.; Khanna, D.R.; Kulkarni, D.B.; Ruhela, M., (2016). Assessment of Ganga River Ecosystem at Haridwar, Uttarakhand, India With Reference to Water Quality Indices. Appl. Water Sci.,  6(2):107–113 (7 pages).

Bora, M.; Goswami, D.C., (2015). A study on seasonal and temporal variation in physico-chemical and hydrological characteristics of river Kolong at Nagaon Town, Assam, India. Arch. Appl. Sci. Res., 7(5): 110-117 (8 pages).

Bora, M.; Goswami, D.C., (2017). Water quality assessment in terms of water quality index (WQI): Case study of the Kolong River, Assam, India. Appl. Water Sci., 7(6): 3125–3135 (11 pages).

Brown, R. M.; McClellan, N. I.; Deininger, R. A.; O’Connor M. F., (1972). A water quality index—crashing the physiological barrier. Indic. Environ. Qual., 1:173–182 (Pages 10).

Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS), Specifications for drinking water IS:10500:1991. Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi. Available at:

Central Pollutin Control Board (CPCB), Water Quality Criteria for designated best use, Available at:

Cude, C.G., (2001). Oregon water quality index: a tool for evaluating water quality management effectiveness. J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc., 37(1):125–137 (13 pages).

Deshkar, S.; Mewada, K.; Gavali, D., (2014). Spatial difference in pollution levels across Vishwamitri River. Int. J. Environ. Biol., 4(1): 51-56 (6 pages).

Fulazzaky, M.A.; Seong, T.W.; Mohd Masirin,  M.I., (2010). Assessment of Water Quality Status for the Selangor River in Malaysia. Water Air Soil Pollut., 205 (1-4): 63–77 (15 pages).

Giri, N.; Singh, O.P., (2013). Urban growth and water quality in Thimphu, Bhutan. J. Urban Environ. Eng., 7(1): 82-95 (14 pages).

Gor, A.; Shah, A., (2014). Water Quality Index of Mahi River, Vadodara, Gujarat. J. Engg. Devel. Res., 2(3): 3214-3219 (6 pages).

Haritash, A.K.; Gaur, S.; Garg, S., (2016). Assessment of water quality and suitability analysis of River Ganga in Rishikesh, India. Appl. Water Sci., 6(4): 383-392 (10 pages).

Khadse, G.K.; Labhasetwar, P.K.; Wate, S.R., (2012). Water Resource Mangement: An Indian Perspective.  J. Environ. Sci. Eng., 54(4): 577-591 (15 pages).

Mophin-Kani,  K.;  Murugesan, A.G., (2011). Evaluation and Classification of Water Quality of Perennial River Tamirabarani through Aggregation of Water Quality Index. Int. J. Environ. Prot., 1(5): 24-33 (10 pages).

Moscuzza, C.; Volpedo, A.V.; Ojeda, C.; FernándezCirelli, A., (2007). Water Quality Index As An Tool For River Assessment In Agricultural Areas in The Pampean Plains Of Argentina. J. Urban Environ. Eng., 1(1): 18-25 (8 pages).

Patel, A.; Khalid, M.; Singh, V.; Thakkar, P.P.; Jose, J.; Patel, N. and Kalubarme, M.H., (2014). Morphometric and Land use Analysis for Watershed Prioritization in Gujarat State, India. Int. J. Sci. Eng. Res.,  5(2): 1-7 (7 pages).

Rajankar, P.N.; Wate, S.R.; Tambekar, D.H.; Gulhane, S.R., (2013). Assessment of ground Water Quality using water auality Index (WQI) in wardha district. J. Environ. Sci. Sustain. (JESS) , 1(2): 49 – 54 (6 pages).

Ram, S.; Joshi, H., (2012). Assessment of river water quality under urban influence: a case study. J. environ. Sci. Eng., 54(1): 78-84 (11 pages).

Ramakrishniah, C.R.; Sadashivaiah, C.; Ranganna, G., (2009). Assessment of water quality index for the groundwater in Tumkur Taluk, , Karnataka State, India. J. Chem., 6(2): 523–530 (8 pages).

Rao, C.S.; Rao, B.S.; Hariharan, A.; Bharathi, N.M., (2010). Determination of water quality index of some areas in Guntur district Andhra Pradesh. Int. J. Appl. Biol. Pharm. Technol., 1(1): 79–86 (8 pages).

Samantray, P.; Mishra, B.K.; Panda, C.R.; Rout, S.P., (2009). Assessment of water quality index in Mahanadi and Atharabanki Rivers and Taldanda Canal in Paradip area, India. J. Hum. Ecol., 26(3): 153-161 (9 pages).

Shah, K.A.; Joshi, G.S., (2017). Evaluation of water quality index for River Sabarmati, Gujarat, India. Appl. Water Sci., 7(3): 1349-1358 (10 pages).

Sharma, D.; Kansal, A., (2011). Water quality analysis of River Yamuna using water quality index in the national capital territory, India (2000–2009). Appl. Water Sci., 1(3-4):147–157 (11 pages).

Sharma, M. K., (2016). Characterization of Point Sources and Assessment of Water Quality of River Vishwamitri, Gujarat. J. Indian Water Resour. Soc., 37(2): 24-30 (9 pages).

Smakhtin, V.U.; Anputhas,  M., (2006). An assessment of environmental flow requirements of Indian river basins, Volume 107 of IWMI Research Report, IWMI, Colombo, Sri Lanka.

Tyagi, S.; Sharma, B.; Singh, P.; Dobhal, R., (2013). Water quality assessment in terms of water quality index. Am. J. Water Resour., 1(3): 34-38 (5 pages).

Vyas, P.C.; Fefar, R.H.; Chari, P.S.; Vaidya, T.N., (2014). Purpose driven study on study of water quality fluctuation in river Vishwamitri. GERI, Vadodara.

World Health Organization (WHO), (2011). Guidelines for drinking water quality, 4th edn. Available at:


International Journal of Human Capital in Urban Management (IJHCUM) welcomes letters to the editor for the post-publication discussions and corrections which allows debate post publication on its site, through the Letters to Editor. Letters pertaining to manuscript published in IJHCUM should be sent to the editorial office of IJHCUM within three months of either online publication or before printed publication, except for critiques of original research. Following points are to be considering before sending the letters (comments) to the editor.

[1] Letters that include statements of statistics, facts, research, or theories should include appropriate references, although more than three are discouraged.

[2] Letters that are personal attacks on an author rather than thoughtful criticism of the author’s ideas will not be considered for publication.

[3] Letters can be no more than 300 words in length.

[4] Letter writers should include a statement at the beginning of the letter stating that it is being submitted either for publication or not.

[5] Anonymous letters will not be considered.

[6] Letter writers must include their city and state of residence or work.

[7] Letters will be edited for clarity and length.