Document Type : CASE STUDY


Tanzania Wildlife Research Institute, Njiro Wildlife Research Centre, Arusha, Tanzania


Urban development is rapidly expanding across the globe and is a major driver of environmental change. It is important to understand how bird species responds to urbanization. Therefore I conducted a qualitative study of birds associated with waste sites such as dumpsite and sewage stabilization ponds was carried out on Moshi municipal. The study assessed the diversity between dumpsite and sewage stabilization ponds using the “Timed species count” method. A total of 15 bird families and 17 species were recorded at both sites. 13 species in 12 bird families at dumpsite and 14 species in 13 bird families at sewage stabilization pond were recorded respectively. There was significant difference in species diversity within the two sites (p<0.05) because of good breeding sites at sewage stabilization ponds which include a wide variety of resources, high productivity and moderate levels of disturbance compared to dumpsite. This study was carried out to enhance conservation awareness. These site serve as biodiversity reservoirs, urban planners should involve interdisciplinary team to make decisions from an ecological perspective when designing urban areas. From this micro-survey It is worth concluding that waste stabilization ponds contains number of resource that attracts bird’s species, as birds are bio indicators of ecosystem health.


Main Subjects

 Akinpelu, A.I., (2006). Birds of the sewage stabilization ponds at Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile-Ife, Nigeria. J. Sci. Technol. (Ghana), 26(2): 56-65 (10 pages).

Angel, S.; Parent, J.; Civco, D.L.; Blei, A.; Potere, D., (2011). The dimensions of global urban expansion: Estimates and projections for all countries, 2000–2050. Prog. Plann., 75(2): 53-107 (55 pages).

Anika, T.; Parasharya, B.M., (2013). Importance of sewage treatment ponds for water-birds in semi-arid zone of Gujarat, India. Int. J.  Res.  BioSci., 2(4): 7-25 (19 pages).

Blair, R.B., (1996). Land use and avian species diversity along an urban gradient. Ecol. Appl., 6(2): 506-519 (14 pages).

Camerini, G.; Groppali, R., (2014). Landfill restoration and biodiversity: A case of study in Northern Italy. Waste Manage. Res., 32(8): 782-790 (9 pages).

Camiña, A., (2004). Griffon Vulture Gyps fulvus monitoring in Spain: current research and conservation projects. In Raptor worldwide. Proceedings of the 6th world conference on birds of prey and owls. WGBP/MME, Budapest, 45-66 (22 pages).

Degraaf, R.M.; Wentworth, J.M., (1986). Avian guild structure and habitat associations in suburban bird communities. Urban Ecol., 9(3-4): 399-412 (14 pages).

Donnelly, R.; Marzluff, J., (2004). Designing research to advance the management of birds in urbanizing areas. In Proceedings 4th International urban wildlife symposium, 114-122 (9 pages).

Fontana, S.; Sattler, T.; Bontadina, F.; Moretti, M., (2011). How to manage the urban green to improve bird diversity and community structure. Landscape Urban Plann., 101(3): 278-285 (8 pages). 

Fuller, R. A.; Irvine, K. N.; Davies, Z. G.; Armsworth, P. R.; Gaston, K. J., (2012). Interactions between People and Birds in Urban Landscapes. Urban Bird Ecology and Conservation, 45: 249–266 (18 pages).

Gough, S.J.; Gillings, S.;Vickery, J.A., (2003). The value and management of wastewater treatment works for breeding and wintering birds in lowland eastern England. BTO research report, (51 pages).

Gregory, R. D.; Gibbons, D. W.; Donald, P. F., (2004). Bird census and survey techniques. Bird Ecology and Conservation, OUP Oxford Publication, 17–56 (40 pages).

Herrando, S.; Weiserbs, A.; Quesada, J.; Ferrer, X.; Paquet, J.Y., (2012). Development of urban bird indicators using data from monitoring schemes in two large European cities. Anim. Biodivers. Conserv., 35(1):141-150 (10 pages).

Larsen, E.A., (2008). Effects of urban development on breeding bird diversity: The role of diet and migration, (55 pages).

Lepczyk, C.A.; Aronson, M.F.; Evans, K.L.; Goddard, M.A.; Lerman, S.B.; MacIvor, J.S., (2017). Biodiversity in the city: fundamental questions for understanding the ecology of urban green spaces for biodiversity conservation. Biosci., 67(9): 799-807 (9 pages).

Lin, H.T.; Sun, C.Y.; Hung, C.T., (2008). A study in the relationship between greenery of urban parks and bird diversity in Tainan City, Taiwan. WIT Trans. Ecol. Environ., 117: 193-202 (10 pages).

Łopucki, R.; Kitowski, I., (2017). How small cities affect the biodiversity of ground-dwelling mammals and the relevance of this knowledge in planning urban land expansion in terms of urban wildlife. Urban Ecosyst., 20(4): 933-943 (11 pages).

McKinney, M.L., (2008). Effects of urbanization on species richness: A review of plants and animals. Urban Ecosyst., 11(2):161-176 (16 pages).

Murgui, E.; Hedblom, M., (2017). Global patterns and drivers of urban bird diversity. In: Ecology and conservation of birds in urban environments, 13-33 (21 pages).

Murray, C.G.; Kasel, S.; Szantyr, E.; Barratt, R.; Hamilton, A.J., (2014). Waterbird use of different treatment stages in waste-stabilisation pond systems. Emu, 114(1): 30-40 (11 pages).

Oka, P.O.; Majuk, S.M., (2016). Collaborating with nature: The pristine habitats, in Ugep, Yakurr LGA, Nigeria. J. Geosci. Environ. Prot., 4(2): 46-52 (7 pages).

Onen, O. P.; Bassey, B. J., (2017). Biodiversity of city dumpsites: What future for the environment?, 22(2): 113–119 (7 pages).

Onen, P.; Monkayuk, S.; Imoke, D., (2016). The unnoticed benefits of city dumpsites, Indian J. Appl. Res., 6(6): 113–119 (8 pages).

Ricklefs, R.E., (2012). Species richness and morphological diversity of passerine birds. In proceedings of the national academy of sciences, 109(36): 14482-14487 (6 pages).

Saito, M.; Koike, F., (2013). Distribution of wild mammal assemblages along an urban–rural–forest landscape gradient in warm-temperate East Asia. PloS one, 8(5): p.e65464 (11 pages).

Shochat, E.; Lerman, S.; Fernández-Juricic, E., (2010). Birds in urban ecosystems: population dynamics, community structure, biodiversity, and conservation. Urban Ecosyst. Ecol., 55: 75-86 (12 pages).

Silva, C. P.; García, C. E.; Estay, S. A.; Barbosa, O.; Chapman, M. G., (2015). Bird richness and abundance in response to urban form in a Latin American City: Valdivia, Chile as a Case Study. PLoS ONE, 10(9): 1–16 (16 pages).

Singh, P.; Borthakur, A.; Singh, R.; Awasthi, S.; Pal, D.B.; Srivastava, P.; Tiwary, D.; Mishra, P.K., (2017). Utilization of temple floral waste for extraction of valuable products: A close loop approach towards environmental sustainability and waste management. Pollut., 3(1): 39-45 (7 pages).

Snep, R.P.; Kooijmans, J.L.; Kwak, R.G.; Foppen, R.P.; Parsons, H.; Awasthy, M.; Sierdsema, H.L.; Marzluff, J.M.; Fernandez-Juricic, E., de Laet, J.; van Heezik, Y.M., (2016). Urban bird conservation: presenting stakeholder-specific arguments for the development of bird-friendly cities. Urban Ecosyst., 19(4):1535-1550 (16 pages).

Soini, E., (2006). Livelihood, land use and environment interactions in the highlands of East Africa. African Zoology (47 pages).

Suarez-Rubio, M.; Lookingbill, T. R., (2016). Forest birds respond to the spatial pattern of exurban development in the Mid-Atlantic region, USA, PeerJ, 4: p.e2039 (25 pages).

Tagliapietra, D.; Sigovini, M., (2010). Biological diversity and habitat diversity: a matter of Science and perception. NEAR Curriculum in Natural Environmental Science. Terre et Environnement, 88: 147–155 (9 pages).

Tilghman, N.G., (1987). Characteristics of urban woodlands affecting breeding bird diversity and abundance. Landscape Urban Plann., 14: 481-495 (15 pages).

Yeragi, L. A.; Mendhulkar, V. D., (2015). ISSN 2249 – 9695 original article biodiversity around garbage area in Kannamwar nagar , Vikhroli Suburb, Int. J. Res. Environ. Sci. Technol., 5(2): 43–48 (6 pages).



International Journal of Human Capital in Urban Management (IJHCUM) welcomes letters to the editor for the post-publication discussions and corrections which allows debate post publication on its site, through the Letters to Editor. Letters pertaining to manuscript published in IJHCUM should be sent to the editorial office of IJHCUM within three months of either online publication or before printed publication, except for critiques of original research. Following points are to be considering before sending the letters (comments) to the editor.

[1] Letters that include statements of statistics, facts, research, or theories should include appropriate references, although more than three are discouraged.

[2] Letters that are personal attacks on an author rather than thoughtful criticism of the author’s ideas will not be considered for publication.

[3] Letters can be no more than 300 words in length.

[4] Letter writers should include a statement at the beginning of the letter stating that it is being submitted either for publication or not.

[5] Anonymous letters will not be considered.

[6] Letter writers must include their city and state of residence or work.

[7] Letters will be edited for clarity and length.