Document Type : CASE STUDY


Agricultural Economics Department, University of Zabol, Zabol, Iran


Removing local communities from lands that they have been exploiting for generations without consultation or adequate compensation can result in retaliation and hostile attitudes toward the objectives of the protected areas.Therefore, this study examines the application of willingness to participate of local communities in the conservation of national parks. For the empirical observations, Iran’s Khabr National Park was studied. The required data were collected using questionnaires fulfilling and interviewing with locals and tourists of the Khabr National Park. For analyzing the data, the logit econometric model was applied. Results indicated that 80 percent of them were eager to participate and they wanted the park to be managed by private sectors. Therefore, it is recommended that the government provide a condition where the private sector act and engage people in the conservation of the park. Factors such as a history of participation in previous projects, being Indigenous, lack of management organization, and familiarity with the environment were determined as the factors which affected the participation in this project.


  • Acknowledged that government protection measures, including biological and mechanical controls have not been effectiveness.
  • Solving environmental problems requires the participation of local communities.
  • Social participation is obtained when people gain utility from their partnership.
  • Various factors such as education, age, indigenous status and etc affect people's willingness to participation for conservation the national parks.


Main Subjects

Adetla, B.O.; Adetoro, A.O., (2014). Threats to Biodiversity Conservation in Cross River National Park, Nigeria. Int. J. Conserv. Sci., 5(4): 547-552 (6 pages).

Amirnejad, H.; AtaeiSalout, K., (2012). Economic Valuation of environmental resources. Avay-e-Masih Publication, sari, Iran. (In Persian)

 Boyd, J. 2007. Nonmarket benefits of nature: What should be counted in green GDP?. J. Ecol. Econ., 61(4): 716-723 (8 pages).

Croxton, S., (1999). Users in control: Farmer participation in technology research and development. In meeting the challenges of animal traction. A resource book of the animal traction network for eastern and southern Africa (ATNESA), Harare, Zimbabwe. Intermediate technology Publications, London, 45-50 (6 pages).

Jerath, N.; Ladhar, S.S.; Saxena, S.K.; Sharma, J.; Sharma, V., (2014). Enhancing Community Participation for Conservation of Wetlands.

 Kerman Department of Environment, (2002). Khabr national parks and Rochon wildlife management Plan. (96 pages).

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), (2002). Annual energy review 2001, U.S. Department of energy. Washington D. C.

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), (2010). Public participation in environmental management. Tehran, (17 pages).

FAO, (1990). Community Forestry, Participatory Monitoring and Evaluation, Bangkok.

Farzan, Y., (2004). Environmental problems in Iran: can we do anything, FTOI.

Gujarati, D. N. (2009). Basic econometrics. Tata McGraw-Hill Education.‏

Hemmati, Z.; Shabiri, M., (2016). Study the status of environmental education in Iran and comparison of it with other countries of the world. Hum. Environ., 37: 61-81 (21 pages).

Kacho, B.; Asfaw, M., (2014). Factors Influencing Participation of the Local Community in Natural Resource Conservation: a Comparative Study of Chiro and Fiche, Ethiopia.‏ Public Policy Admin. Res., 4(7): 48-55 (8 pages).

Kiss, A., (2004). Is community-based ecotourism a good use of biodiversity conservation funds?. Trends  Ecol.  Evol., 19(5): 232-237 (6 pages).‏

Lahijanian, N., (2010). Study on Structure and Function of Environmental NGOs and Their Roles in Civil Development Process. J. Sci. Environ. Technol., 12: 101-111 (12 pages).

McCleave, J.; Espiner, S.; Booth, K., (2006). The New Zealand people–park relationship: An exploratory model. Soc. Nat. Res., 19(6): 547-561 (15 pages).

Menegaki, A.N.; Hanley, N.; Tsagarakis, K.P., (2007). The social acceptability and valuation of recycled water in Crete: A study of consumers' and farmers' attitudes. Ecol. Econ., 62(1): 7-18 (12 pages).

Mutamba, E., (2004). Community participation in natural resources management: Reality or rhetoric?. Environ. Monit. Assess., 99(1): 105-113 (9 pages).

Olesu, L.B.; Baidu, Y.N., (1998). The Participation of Local Communities in The Conservation of Wetlands Resources: The case of Marine turtle. The World Bank, (7 pages).

Sam, I.E.; Nnaji, E.S.; Etefia, T.E., (2014). Level Of Community Participation In The Conservation Of Natural Resources In Akamkpa Local Government Area, Southern Cross River State, Nigeria. IOSR J. Res. Method Educ., 4(4): 30-35 (6 pages).

Salehi, S. (2008). A Study of Factors Underpinning Environmental Attitudes and Behaviors. Ph.D. Dissertation, the University of Leeds, UK.

Schelhas, J.; Sherman, R. E.; Fahey, T. J.; Lassoie, J. P., (2002). Linking community and national park development: A case from the Dominican Republic. Nat. Resour. Forum. 26(2): 140-149 (11 pages).

Shrestha, U., (2013). Community participation in wetland conservation in Nepal. J. Agric. Environ., 12:140-147 (8 pages).

Turnock, D., (2004). The Role of NGOs in Environmental Education in South-eastern Europe. Int. Res. Geogr. Environ. Educ., 13(1): 103-109.

Ward, P., (2010). Participatory development in Jamaica: Does it work in practice. Soc. Econ. Stud., 59(4): 167-196 (30 pages).



International Journal of Human Capital in Urban Management (IJHCUM) welcomes letters to the editor for the post-publication discussions and corrections which allows debate post publication on its site, through the Letters to Editor. Letters pertaining to manuscript published in IJHCUM should be sent to the editorial office of IJHCUM within three months of either online publication or before printed publication, except for critiques of original research. Following points are to be considering before sending the letters (comments) to the editor.

[1] Letters that include statements of statistics, facts, research, or theories should include appropriate references, although more than three are discouraged.

[2] Letters that are personal attacks on an author rather than thoughtful criticism of the author’s ideas will not be considered for publication.

[3] Letters can be no more than 300 words in length.

[4] Letter writers should include a statement at the beginning of the letter stating that it is being submitted either for publication or not.

[5] Anonymous letters will not be considered.

[6] Letter writers must include their city and state of residence or work.

[7] Letters will be edited for clarity and length.